The Minority Report: Balancing Sex Education

Last updated on: June 5, 2012 at 11:57 pm by Drew Dixon

The Minority Report: Balancing Sex Education 2012-06-05T23:57:46-06:00 Drew Dixon

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

When many Christians hear stories like that of Bedford-Stuyvesant Preparatory High School which had planned to hand out condoms at their high school prom, there seems to be a tremendous temptation to overreact. We get this picture in our head of school administrators forcing condoms in the hands of unsuspecting young people with the purpose of enabling them to have sex freely. We live in a sex saturated culture and we hear stories like this and we feel that our schools must be willfully embracing that culture and stamping approval on premarital sex. A little bit of empathy would go a long way in sorting out the true motives behind current trends in sex education.

Don’t get me wrong, I believe that abstinence before marriage is the clear teaching of Scripture. I have a 10 month old daughter and as she gets older, I intend to clearly teach her that sex is a wonderful and sacred thing that is to be enjoyed inside of marriage. My wife and I will teach her that the safest way to have sex is in the context of a committed marriage. My wife and I intend to be the primary teachers of our children in terms of sex education–we won’t expect any institution to bear primarily responsibility for that charge.

Thus, when I hear about plans to hand out condoms at a high school prom, there is part of me that wants to be angry as I wouldn’t want a school contradicting me as a parent. To be fair, Bedford-Stuyvesant Preparatory seems to recognize this on some level as they repealed their plans. But let’s take a moment and consider what might motivate a school to do something like hand out condoms on prom night. If we would take the time to carefully consider such motivations, we might find that we share something in common with those who promote a more liberal approach to sex education.

There are two primary motivations behind giving condoms to teenagers: preventing teenage pregnancy and the spread of disease. While condoms do not provide comprehensive protection against either of these, we can all agree that hindering teenage pregnancy and the spread of disease are good things. Teenage pregnancy, in particular, is not just bad for the girls who find themselves pregnant (they are often ill equipped emotionally, financially, and physically to have a child), but it is also bad for society as a whole. More teenage pregnancies mean more children being raised by parents (and often just one parent) who are ill equipped emotionally, financially, and physically to raise a child. That is not, by the way, an argument for abortion but an argument for good stewardship of society. There are millions of teens who aren’t getting the kind of sex education in their homes that my wife and I plan to give our daughter–many are receiving very poor sex education if any at all. As a citizen and as a Christian, that should concern me. I don’t mention all this to say that more condoms in our public schools is the answer, I merely want to highlight what motivates such practices in our schools.

As a Christian, I believe that God designed sex to be practiced and enjoyed inside of marriage. I also believe that man is not inherently good. I believe that man is enslaved to sin (Rom. 6) and in such slavery “it is impossible” for man “to please God” (Rom. 8:7). Thus, I not only believe that teenagers can’t abide by God’s design for marriage, but I also believe that apart from Christ they won’t. It is only by the grace of God that any young person keeps themselves sexually pure before marriage. So when I hear stories like that of Beford-Stuyvesant Preparatory, I have mixed emotions. I know that those who would hand out condoms are trying to save teens and their potential children from avoidable pain and difficulty. As Christians that ought to be something that we at least sympathize with this side of Christ’s return when every human heart has not been turned toward its maker.

Previous Post

June 4, 2012

The Moviegoer: Snow White Fails to Inspire

Next Post

June 6, 2012 The Holy Huddle: Is Sports Fandom a Bastion of Hatred?

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Asides Elsewhere Featured Film Games General Culture Headline Literature Music Of the Moment Podcast Politics RetroPost Sports Technology Television Uncategorized Viral

Select a Month February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz