Patheos

BuddhistCatholicContemplativeEvangelicalGeneral ChristianHinduJewishLatter-day SaintMuslimNew VisionsProgressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Patheos

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Christ and Pop Culture

Eat Your Vegetables: "Being John Malkovich," Being Puppets Without Strings

Last updated on: May 17, 2012 at 8:00 am   by Jonathan Sircy

Eat Your Vegetables: "Being John Malkovich," Being Puppets Without Strings 2012-05-17T08:00:47-06:00 Jonathan Sircy

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Each week in Eat Your Vegetables, Jonathan Sircy shares the benefit and appeal of some of the culture’s more inaccessible or intimidating artifacts.

Being John Malkovich (Spike Jonze; 1999) deserves a second look (or a first look, for that matter), especially after the Criterion Collection released a deluxe edition of the film on Tuesday (you can also stream it via Netflix).  The film is notable for three reasons: it introduced indie-darlings Spike Jonze and Charlie Kaufman to a larger audience, it helped reinvigorate the at-the-time moribund career of Tiger-blood proponent Charlie Sheen, and last, but not least, it confirmed America’s suspicion that John Malkovich was indeed an abnormal individual.

Like the brain of its titular star, the film is labyrinthine. It combines the plots that could have each made their own indie dramas. Out-of-work puppeteer Craig Schwartz (John Cusack), his wife, the animal-loving Lottie (Cameron Diaz), love the same woman. That’s one movie. In another, Schwartz schemes in a demented, Horatio-Alger way to achieve national stardom as a puppeteer. In yet another plot, the one referred to in the title, Schwartz discovers a portal into the brain of vaguely famous actor John Malkovich. The portal allows the occupant to experience reality from inside Malkovich’s mind for 15 minutes before he or she is spewed out onto the New Jersey Turnpike.

Comic hijinks ensue.

Well, not really. The film has plenty of funny lines, but its claustrophobic mise-en-scene, minor-keyed score, and repetition of a performance art piece called “Craig’s Dance of Despair and Disillusionment” aren’t really feel-good fare. It’s not a fun truth that we all want to be somebody else. In fact, the film’s black joke is even more depressing: given the opportunity, we would simply morph that new person into us.

One of the funniest visual motifs in the film is how Craig and Dr. Lester (Orson Bean) both make Malkovich over in their image. Cusack and Diaz are dirty, mussed up versions of their normal Hollywood selves. You really hate Craig at the film’s end, and Lottie contradictorily wants to be someone else (I’m sure C. Diaz fans who watched the film hoped it was someone with a hair brush and an incinerator for her character’s mom jeans).

Maxine (Catherine Keener), the woman Craig and Lottie both love, is the film’s anomaly. Preternaturally confident, Maxine seems to be the only person in Kaufman and Jonze’s universe that is comfortable in her own skin (cue the Dove commercial). Fittingly, the movie makes her into a mother. Her act is that she doesn’t act. With anyone. She’s all surface.

That isn’t to say she’s necessarily shallow. Craig and Lottie have depths. One of the film’s points is that usually those depths conceal things that are worth burying.

Kaufman, the screenwriter, conspicuously avoids the supernatural ramifications of of the film. Even when something metaphysical comes up in conversation, it’s as a joke from Sheen concerning the possibility of lesbian witches. Even Craig, the most philosophical of the characters, never asks whether the portal confirms or denies the existence of God. Instead, he goes on about the soul and identity. One of the talking heads in the film’s faux-doc on Malkovich likens the puppetmaster’s power to the divine. Schwartz himself performs scenes from Abelard and Heloise concerning a monk and nun who harbor deep passion for one another. The characters are superficially deep. They want to know who they “really” are, but their conception of identity is chiefly motivated by sex.

If none of the characters take the time to contemplate how they’re ALWAYS performing their identity (whether they’re inside Malkovich or not), none of them realize how they have denigrated their creative passions to cheap power plays and lustful flings. “It’s not about playing with puppets,” Craig (controlling Malkovich) tells Maxine. “You’re right,” Maxine responds enthusiastically. “It’s about playing with people.” A self-conscious film like this one should prompt someone to ask: who holds the strings? It’s telling that no one ever does.

Asides

Film

Eat Your Vegetables

Previous Post



May 16, 2012

The Holy Huddle: Sports Figures, The Hunger Games, and Sociological Terminology

Next Post



May 17, 2012 Mixed Signals: How to Make a Proper Apology


Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Asides Elsewhere Featured Film Games General Culture Headline Literature Music Of the Moment Podcast Politics RetroPost Sports Technology Television Uncategorized Viral

Select a Month February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007




TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What river did the Israelites cross to enter the Promised Land?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Nile River Euphrates River Jordan River Red Sea

Related posts from Christ and Pop Culture

Evangelical

How The Lego Movie Helped Me Overcome Fantastical...

Christ and Pop Culture

Evangelical

The Kiddy Pool: Philip Seymour Hoffman and the...

Christ and Pop Culture

Evangelical

Ones and Zeros: A Reflection on Spike Jonze's...

Christ and Pop Culture

Evangelical

Ocean's 11, 1944: Sorting through the Jumble of...

Christ and Pop Culture

TRENDING AT PATHEOS Evangelical

The REST of Your Life: A Creative Wrestles...

This week I had a conversation with a good friend from church....

How the author of the world's best hymn...

I've been working with John Newton for a while now. This makes...

Psalm 130 | Lectio Divina

Long before this Lectio Divina, Psalm 130 - the song - started...

What About the Trees? Another Living Parable

After I finished writing the last article about falling leaves as a...

Why Classical Education Is a Conversation, Not a...

Come and Read: Joy in Classical Education When I was a little...

What Happened at Cornell?

Cornell University has received a great deal of negative publicity and intense...

view all Evangelical blogs

Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Copyright 2008-2026, Patheos. All rights reserved.

Subscription Support Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube