Mixed Signals: Skype's Campaign Wants to Bring Back Social Graces

Last updated on: April 12, 2012 at 9:00 am by Erin Straza

Mixed Signals: Skype's Campaign Wants to Bring Back Social Graces 2012-04-12T09:00:09-06:00 Erin Straza

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Mixed Signals is Erin Straza’s weekly musing about marketing miscellany in advertising, branding, and messaging.

Social etiquette is like the English language: It’s always changing. Prescriptivists — in language and etiquette — call us to adhere to certain rules for Propriety’s sake.

The rule-makers forget, however, that Propriety is a moving target.

Somehow we know what’s expected of us, even though there are shifts in Propriety from generation to generation. We know which situations necessitate a visit over a phone call, and we know when we need to send a handwritten note over a casual e-mail.

Even so, as the rules evolve, the prescriptivists remind us that things may have been a bit better before the evolution. That’s the point of a new campaign for Skype.

The premise of the campaign’s messages is that Skype restores the human face to our text-coded and 140-character-limited relationships. Unlike the heartless connections you get from Facebook, Twitter, and SMS, Skype delivers through communications that are more proper, more acceptable, and more couth.

Two of the ads in the series ask rhetorical questions about the decline of our social etiquette, questioning when it became socially acceptable to use technology instead of engage people face to face:

When did LOL replace the sound of laughter?
When did it become okay to text mum “Happy Birthday”?

I agree: Hearing a loved one laugh at my wit is way better than getting an LOL in reply to something witty I’ve posted. And being with my mom to wish her “Happy Birthday” is way better than texting it.

But these campaign messages forget that most people are not using technology to replace human interaction but to enhance it. For me, technology fills in the gaps when more direct forms of communication aren’t possible. Only on rare occasions do I use technology to avoid hearing someone’s voice or being with someone in person — and when needed for such situations, I am very grateful for the blessing of this technology.

The underlying message here is the negative aspect of change in regard to social etiquette. Change is often tagged as a decline or a loss, even when the shift is morally neutral. The reality is that these are communication tools to be used, with no one tool being more or less moral than another.

More important than the delivery tool is the actual message. What we say has the ability to build up or tear down (Eph. 4:29). A careless word will hurt another person whether we speak it in person or Tweet about it.

The selection of communication tools before us today isn’t final. Those will change in years to come, requiring new social rules for the new social tools. Whatever those new tools will be, what won’t change is God’s prescription for life-giving communication:

“Let your speech always be gracious, seasoned with salt” (Col. 4:6, ESV).
“And the Lord’s servant must not be quarrelsome but kind to everyone” (2 Tim. 2:24, ESV).
“Gracious words are like a honeycomb, sweetness to the soul and health to the body.” (Prov. 16:24, ESV)
“Be kind to one another” (Eph. 4:32, ESV)

Previous Post

April 11, 2012

What Memes Mean: Avoiding Scumbag Apologetics

Next Post

April 13, 2012 Not Fit for Dinner: The Coming ApocoPresidency?

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Asides Elsewhere Featured Film Games General Culture Headline Literature Music Of the Moment Podcast Politics RetroPost Sports Technology Television Uncategorized Viral

Select a Month February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz