Citizenship Confusion: David Barton's Deception (or Ignorance)

Last updated on: April 23, 2012 at 7:00 am by Alan Noble

Citizenship Confusion: David Barton's Deception (or Ignorance) 2012-04-23T07:00:10-06:00 Alan Noble

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Every Monday in Citizenship Confusion, Alan Noble discusses how we confuse our heavenly citizenship with citizenship to the state, culture, and the world.

As a kid, one of my favorite things to do was to start a “club” with my friends. I enjoyed starting these clubs so much that sometimes starting the club was the only thing the “club” ever did, which was fine because the important thing was that I was In a Club. I loved being a part of something significant, being on the Inside, Belonging. And, if I’m honest, I still love that feeling. Looking around at Evangelical Culture, I notice I’m not the only one.

Maybe the story we like to tell ourselves the most has us cast as the Pure, True Heritage of the Founding Fathers and the persecuted minority in a Liberal, Secular, Postmodern culture. This way we can feel like we’re the ones who really Belong in America while retaining a nice victim complex (As I’ve argued here: Citizenship Confusion: Ray Comfort and the Victim Complex in the American Church).

The story goes that the founding fathers were really Christians, and therefore the US is by design a Christian Nation which should be ruled by Christians, those who have a right and obligation to take it back for God so that it can be prosperous again.

One of the most influential and prominent Christian figures who has promoted this narrative is David Barton, President and Founder of WallBuilders (and a man who believes that progressive income tax is unbiblical because Israel didn’t have such a policy). Barton is the owner of a huge collection of historical documents and has written numerous books on the subject of church and state and the founding fathers. However, Barton is not actually a trained historian, but an amateur who has made living off of promoting a particular narrative to a group of people who were desperate to hear that narrative. Barton’s popularity among conservative politicians and Christians is impressive, which is why he is important to talk about. For example, Kirk Cameron recently interviewed David Barton for his movie, Monumental, which I will probably discuss next week in my column.

Last week, Glenn Beck had David Barton on his show to discuss the Christianity of Thomas Jefferson and specifically the Jefferson Bible. The clip was posted on The Blaze, where readers quickly drew the assumption that the Federal Government was using the Public Schools to brainwash our kids about the Founding Fathers.

As you will see, Barton is either very deceptive or incredibly ignorant, and in either case he is not a man that Christians should be relying on for a historical justification of their political movement. If we desire to be a witness in our culture, we must stand by the standards of honesty, truth, and love that are basic to our faith. Which means that when we see figures like Barton spreading falsehood, we need to call them for what they are.

In this clip (start around the 4 minute mark, unless you want to hear Beck talk about how God is using Barton to save America), Barton describes how people often tell him how Jefferson cut out all the miraculous parts of the New Testament when he created his Jefferson Bible. Barton dismisses these people as ignorant (around 7:30) and goes on to explain a bit about how this Bible, called “The Philosophy of Jesus of Nazareth,” has all the miracles and the resurrection included. After this, he discusses another Bible the Jefferson made, called The Life and Morals of Jesus of Nazareth. In the second Bible, Barton tells us that Jefferson’s intent was to list 50 of Christ’s moral teachings so that they would be easy to read for people, because he felt that what our country needed was a good moral foundation. What Barton doesn’t say is that this book includes not only moral teachings of Christ but also the story of his life, minus all the miraculous stuff, like the resurrection.

If the purpose of the book was only to offer Christ’s moral teachings, Jefferson would have had no reason to describe his birth, childhood, or death, as he does. Barton also doesn’t mention that when most people discuss the “Jefferson Bible,” including the Smithsonian, they have the second book in mind, not the first. I was unable to find any copies of the “Philosophy of Jesus of Nazareth” online, but the latter “Bible” can be seen on the Smithsonian website. And as you can see, Jefferson’s Bible ends without the resurrection. Barton dismisses as ignorant fools those who repeat the liberal lie that Jefferson cut out all the miracles from the Bible, and then when he discusses The Life and Morals of Jesus of Nazareth–the text people refer to as the “Jefferson Bible”–he repeatedly insists that the book was about “morals,” as if it were wisdom literature, rather than a narrative, minus Christ’s divinity.

Barton’s story that the Smithsonian has deliberately manipulated the historical facts to deny Jefferson’s faith fits nicely with the narrative that we are the True Heritage of our nation’s Founding Fathers and secularists and Muslims are interlopers. But the truth is much more complicated and ugly than that, as this case shows.

The ugly truth is that in this clip, Barton is either deceptive or incredibly ignorant (I don’t want to say he lies because he might sue me; no, really, that’s happened). And there’s good reason to believe that Barton is wrong about a great deal else (See this Examiner piece, or this LA Times article, or Wikipedia’s section on his criticism, or this Facebook Page on Jefferson).

As Christians we must be fervent for the truth, and so when someone like Barton who claims to be speaking for us influences conservative politicians and seeks to promote a certain political ideology and is clearly wrong, we need to speak out, otherwise what will our witness be?

Next week, I’ll take a look at how this same narrative of history is promoted by Kirk Cameron in his movie, Monumental.

Asides

Politics

Citizenship Confusion

Previous Post

April 20, 2012

The Televangelist: The New Girl and the Challenge of Maturity

Next Post

April 23, 2012 The Kiddy Pool: Mind, Body, and Breast—Public Discourses on Breastfeeding

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Asides Elsewhere Featured Film Games General Culture Headline Literature Music Of the Moment Podcast Politics RetroPost Sports Technology Television Uncategorized Viral

Select a Month February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz