Patheos

BuddhistCatholicContemplativeEvangelicalGeneral ChristianHinduJewishLatter-day SaintMuslimNew VisionsProgressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Patheos

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Christ and Pop Culture

The Kiddy Pool: The Rise of Single Motherhood

Last updated on: February 27, 2012 at 8:31 am   by Erin Wyble Newcomb

The Kiddy Pool: The Rise of Single Motherhood 2012-02-27T08:31:26-07:00 Erin Wyble Newcomb

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Every week in The Kiddy Pool, Erin Newcomb confronts one of many issues that parents must deal with related to popular culture.

The New York Times reported this week that more than half of all children born to women under 30 are born outside of marriage. According to the article, there are a number of causes for this trend, including a generation jaded toward marriage by their parents’ divorces, a preference for cohabitation (which, even with children, is less stable than marriage), and a recession that has particularly affected men’s earning power. Further, the article cites research claiming that these birthrate trends represent an educational, racial, and class divide, with wealthier, white, college-educated parents more likely to marry before children. Many of the women in the article discuss unplanned pregnancies and a reluctance to marry men who won’t provide increased social or financial stability.

Yet Slate columnist Jennifer Olien takes her response to this trend even further; she describes her own childhood (where her mother primarily raised her, along with a network of helpers) as “idyllic.” As Olien asserts, “in many ways it seems easier to raise a kid alone. Being a single parent by choice would mean not having to deal with another person’s sets of demands or expectations of what child-rearing means. I wouldn’t burden a child with the emotional baggage of divorce or the highs and lows of an unhappy relationship. It would just be the two of us and a supporting cast of extended family.” While much of Olien’s article seems thoughtful and well-reasoned, both she and the Times article are depicting a fundamentally different family than the one God describes. She does not acknowledge that she is coming from a position of privilege and that most single mothers do not have the sort of support system she idealizes. Olien also assumes that marital relationships are basically negative, and seeks to avoid conflict rather than compromise and work through it; she idealizes individualism at the expense of enriching a child’s life with meaningful negotiations that form the crux of real-life relationships.

I acknowledge that marriage, historically, has often not been what God intended, either. There’s a long history of marital alliances used for political or monetary gain, and I don’t deny that the family structure prioritized by the U.S. government and society fails to acknowledge the many manifestations that family takes, often for valid reasons. When my husband and I married, we gained the social and financial benefits that come with marriage—romantic things like sharing heating costs and automatically being each other’s next of kin. We also entered into a relationship that mirrors the union of Christ and the church, and thus marriage becomes not just a legal or social contract but a ministry.

My husband likes to say that choosing a spouse is choosing someone to socialize you. In terms of our spiritual development, that means that we are meant to pray together and for each other, and to correct each other’s faults in love. We are supposed to serve each other, refine each other, and ultimately use our marital state to serve others. Bringing a child into that relationship means that it’s not always easy or perfect, and that we don’t always act in accordance with the fruits of the Spirit. Part of the purpose of marriage seems to be healthy conflict—and then healthy conflict resolution—so that all members can grow more like Christ. It’s not perfect. It doesn’t always work. And there are lots of couples who begin with the best of intentions and still suffer tremendous disappointment. But for Christian marriage, it’s important to cling to the ideal, to hold fast to the union God created that transcends legal or social or financial incentives, because Godly marriage is about more than that. It’s about God. And that’s something children benefit from seeing, even if we have to wrestle through the rough spots.

Asides

General Culture

the kiddy pool

Previous Post



February 27, 2012

Citizenship Confusion: The Backlash against Obama's Apology for the Koran Burning

Next Post



February 28, 2012 Is Church Discipline Cultish? A Response to the Mars Hill Drama


Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Asides Elsewhere Featured Film Games General Culture Headline Literature Music Of the Moment Podcast Politics RetroPost Sports Technology Television Uncategorized Viral

Select a Month February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007




TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What items did Pharaoh give Joseph as a sign of authority?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Chariot and whip Ring and robe Crown and sandals Sword and shield

Related posts from Christ and Pop Culture

Evangelical

CAPC Podcast #4: Hot Pockets, Steven Furtick's Elevation...

Christ and Pop Culture

Evangelical

Olympic Metaphors and Marriage

Christ and Pop Culture

Evangelical

Authenticating Ourselves to Death

Christ and Pop Culture

Evangelical

The Kiddy Pool: All in the Olympic Family

Christ and Pop Culture

TRENDING AT PATHEOS Evangelical

The REST of Your Life: A Creative Wrestles...

This week I had a conversation with a good friend from church....

How the author of the world's best hymn...

I've been working with John Newton for a while now. This makes...

Psalm 130 | Lectio Divina

Long before this Lectio Divina, Psalm 130 - the song - started...

What About the Trees? Another Living Parable

After I finished writing the last article about falling leaves as a...

Why Classical Education Is a Conversation, Not a...

Come and Read: Joy in Classical Education When I was a little...

What Happened at Cornell?

Cornell University has received a great deal of negative publicity and intense...

view all Evangelical blogs

Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Copyright 2008-2026, Patheos. All rights reserved.

Subscription Support Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube