Patheos

BuddhistCatholicContemplativeEvangelicalGeneral ChristianHinduJewishLatter-day SaintMuslimNew VisionsProgressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Patheos

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Christ and Pop Culture

Music at Mars Hill: A Response to an Open Letter to Praise Bands

Last updated on: October 9, 2012 at 11:59 am   by Luke Larsen

Music at Mars Hill: A Response to an Open Letter to Praise Bands 2012-10-09T11:59:00-06:00 Luke Larsen

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Music at Mars Hill is a weekly column by Luke Larsen that seeks to find God amidst the newest trends in both mainstream music and independent music.

I had planned a different topic for my column this week, but when I stumbled upon an Elsewhere post here on CaPC from Professor James Smith of Calvin College, I felt it was necessary to respond in some fashion. The post is titled “An Open Letter To Praise Bands” and was featured on Gospel Coalition. It lays out three criticisms about modern worship music. You see a lot of this online, but this one in particular caught my attention.

First of all, it was incredibly kind and sincere about its criticisms — even taking some of the blame upon the congregation itself for “encouraging” worship leading practices that are unhealthy for the Church. This is the kind of discussion I love to see online. Second, it pays special attention to the actual music going on in our churches on Sunday mornings and takes it seriously — hopefully realizing that the style and music itself is just as important as the words in worship songs.

However, I also found myself disagreeing with Smith on just about every point he makes. Here are the three arguments he makes in the article and my responses to each:

1. If we, the congregation, can’t hear ourselves, it’s not worship.

I don’t know where Professor Smith is going with this one. Trying to define what makes something “worship” in terms of anything but the posture of your heart toward God is stepping on some dangerous ground as far as I’m concerned. In college, I got the opportunity to lead a very passionate college group in worship each week. We played big and we played loud and let me tell you: Our congregation sang even louder. As a worship leader, there was nothing more humbling and special than being able to hear your congregation singing at the top of their lungs to God — there is indeed something very powerful about hearing people sing together in unison. However, to say that playing music loudly is somehow keeping congregations everywhere from worshipping God is going too far. I can’t tell you how many times I’ve talked to people my age about how difficult it is to freely worship in a setting where everyone around them can hear and see them singing and expressing themselves to God.

2. If we, the congregation, can’t sing along, it’s not worship.

Again, Professor Smith is attempting to categorize what is and isn’t worship rather than trying to work through what is useful and helpful in worship services. I understand what he means by this: Songs should be easy to pick up and accessible to the people in your church. I wholeheartedly agree. However, is it not possible to worship without singing at all? Is it not possible to worship in utter silence?

3. If you*, the praise band, are the center of attention, it’s not worship*.

I really understand the argument the writer is trying to make here. He’s right in that it isn’t at all about the people on stage. It’s about the Spirit of the Lord speaking through them. In fact, following this line of logic is what made the Church of Christ denomination remove instruments from their worship services. However, his comments about putting worship bands in the back of rooms comes off slightly offensive to me. Not because I like being the center of attention, but because if we are not mature enough to be able to be led by another human being to Jesus and not worship that human being, perhaps we shouldn’t have pastors speaking at churches either. Why not just play a recording and have everyone worship to that?

My point here is that God uses different human beings with all their different skills, brains, and character traits to lead His Church in different ways and to move in His Spirit through. In our local churches we, as the congregation, should be thinking deeply about the music we play in worship to God because it really does matter. It really does influence how we think about God and how we interact with Him. The important thing to remember is that this will end up looking different in every congregation and every culture.

Editor: Here’s a related column on contemporary worship music: “Citizenship Confusion: Auto-Tuned Elevation Church.”

Asides

Music

calvin college

gospel coalition

Music at Mars Hill

open letter to praise bands

professor james smith

The Feedback Loop

Worship Music

worship music criticism

Previous Post



February 22, 2012

What Memes Mean: What We All Think We Do...

Next Post



February 23, 2012 Mixed Signals: Why Christianity Doesn’t Get the Sympathy Vote


Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Asides Elsewhere Featured Film Games General Culture Headline Literature Music Of the Moment Podcast Politics RetroPost Sports Technology Television Uncategorized Viral

Select a Month February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007




TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What were Jesus' followers called?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Prophets Disciples Judges Shepherds

Related posts from Christ and Pop Culture

Evangelical

CAPC Podcast #4: Hot Pockets, Steven Furtick's Elevation...

Christ and Pop Culture

Evangelical

In Light of Macklemore's Same Love, the Church...

Christ and Pop Culture

Evangelical

Is the Proper Christian Response to the Grammys...

Christ and Pop Culture

Evangelical

Those Generous Robots: Daft Punk and Musical Nostalgia

Christ and Pop Culture

TRENDING AT PATHEOS Evangelical

How the author of the world's best hymn...

I've been working with John Newton for a while now. This makes...

Psalm 130 | Lectio Divina

Long before this Lectio Divina, Psalm 130 - the song - started...

What About the Trees? Another Living Parable

After I finished writing the last article about falling leaves as a...

Why Classical Education Is a Conversation, Not a...

Come and Read: Joy in Classical Education When I was a little...

Falling Leaves: A Living Parable on Letting Go

I’ve spent the vast majority of my life in the southeast corner...

What Happened at Cornell?

Cornell University has received a great deal of negative publicity and intense...

view all Evangelical blogs

Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Copyright 2008-2026, Patheos. All rights reserved.

Subscription Support Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube