The Kiddy Pool: Digital Natives

Last updated on: October 31, 2011 at 4:17 pm by Erin Wyble Newcomb

The Kiddy Pool: Digital Natives 2011-10-31T16:17:15-06:00 Erin Wyble Newcomb

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Every week in The Kiddy Pool, Erin Newcomb confronts one of many issues that parents must deal with related to popular culture.

The November edition of Wired features the Muppets Bunsen and Beaker (always a good start), but what piqued my interest was a one-page article tucked into the middle of the magazine. “Why Johnny Can’t Search,” by Clive Thompson, plays with the decades-old questions about why kids can’t do things that seem really basic to their education (Johnny can’t read or count, either). Thompson reports on a study out of the College of Charleston claiming that while students might be really comfortable using technology, they’re not actually that good at evaluating the credibility of their sources.

This study confirms with scientific evidence what I (and most other English teachers and librarians I know) already knew from experience. The generation of so-called digital natives is remarkably savvy with using technology (all those screens and buttons!), but when it comes to assessing tone or determining authorial credentials, they’re lost. I think part of this phenomenon comes from the “everybody’s an expert” climate of the Internet age, where credentials aren’t actually required for posting things on Google or YouTube. The available technology can make many non-expert sites look extremely professional—which might belie the nonsensical content that often gets taken for serious thought.

Many of my students consider a Google search research, yet the academic definition of research involves rigorous testing, peer review, and an elaborate system of credentialing. No, it’s not fast (certainly not like Google), but it contains actual, substantial information. Not foolproof, but not fool’s bait either. Thompson asserts the increased necessity of librarians as “our national leaders in this fight” in teaching what ultimately boils down to discernment. And yet the system itself seems to work against the development of wisdom; I can’t imagine that all those hours of test prep utilize the teachers’ wisdom or develop the students’. We have an arsenal of qualified teachers whose hands are tied by bureaucracy and a generation of students whose thumbs are texting away at the speed of light. But developing discernment takes time, wisdom, and reflection—and even digital natives can’t find those things in a Google search.

Previous Post

October 31, 2011

Girls, Cults, and Healing Past Wounds

Next Post

November 1, 2011 Podcast #103: Overthinking Occupy Wall Street

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Asides Elsewhere Featured Film Games General Culture Headline Literature Music Of the Moment Podcast Politics RetroPost Sports Technology Television Uncategorized Viral

Select a Month February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz