Patheos

BuddhistCatholicContemplativeEvangelicalGeneral ChristianHinduJewishLatter-day SaintMuslimNew VisionsProgressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Patheos

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Christ and Pop Culture

The Question of Playing Against – and as – Osama

Last updated on: May 30, 2011 at 5:04 pm   by bwallis

The Question of Playing Against – and as – Osama 2011-05-30T17:04:16-06:00 bwallis

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Guest writer Benjamin Wallis is the Senior Editor for the Cross and the Controller and podcaster on No Avatars Allowed, a twice-weekly videogame and theology podcast.  He is a Postulant for Holy Orders in the Episcopal Diocese of Pennsylvania, an M. Div. Student at the General Theological Seminary in New York City, father, and avid gamer.

The following article was first published at The Cross and the Controller and has been adapted for publication on our site.

When I was a kid I was always the Cop, and never the Robber.

I loved “playing make believe” (or role-playing as I like to call it now). Make believe was the best game of all.  I would explore different characters, from knights in shining armor, to army commanders in the heat of battle, to government agents hunting down drug lords.  I had a strange and imaginative childhood.  This play led to a love of writing.  I would “self publish” short stories, writing them out into little books with self drawn cover art.  Even though I loved to write, the writing served primarily to fuel the play.  It always came back to make believe, an elementary form of live action role playing.  I was LARP’ing long before I ever rolled a d20.

Every day millions of other kids around the world engage in this form of LARPing.  They pretend to be Jedi and Sith in an endless battle of good vs. evil.  Before there was Star Wars they were Cowboys and Indians, Cops and Robbers.  No matter how those roles are filled they’re always representative of the same concepts: good and evil.  When kids play this game it usually ends the same: good triumphs over evil. My nephews play Jedi vs. Sith, but of course the Jedi always beat the Sith.  The Cops always catch the Robbers.  Good beats evil. This kind of fantasy violence helps children learn the difference between good and evil.  This make believe also prepares children to cope with real life situations.  Often, children will pretend to play a baby lion whose mother has died because they’re afraid that their parents could die and they’re learning to cope with real life possibilities.

Videogames provide us with similar opportunities.  Heavy Rain gives players the chance to face the death of a child.  Halo: Reach gives the chance to stand and fight against genocide.  Many games let us play the good guy, but other games let us play both sides.  Counter-Strike reenacts battles between terrorists and counter-terrorists. Some games let us explore our dark side.  Grand Theft Auto is notorious for letting you steal and kill in a sandbox city, an open exploration of crime to your heart’s content.  Now, in Kuma Games’ game KumaWar it’s the Navy SEALs vs. Osama bin Laden and company.  If children’s play allows for the exploration of fear in a safe way where the good guys usually come out on top, videogames take the exploration even further.  They let us explore our own dark side, and even blur the lines between good and evil. This generates a lot of buzz and criticism.  It’s easy to understand why you would play as a hero, fighting against evil and injustce.  But why would anyone want to play a game where you shoot unarmed civilians in an airport?  Why would anyone play a game where you can defend Osama bin Laden against American troops?

These games are appealing to us because they are an adult version of the old Cops and Robbers.  They allow us to struggle through our fear of real life possibilities.  They help us explore our world in a safe environment: an isolated, simulated environment.

In his article on KumaWar, Brian Crecente asks some tough questions about the morality of playing this kind of game: “Is this essentially the same as ‘spiking the football’ after a victory, something President Barack Obama has repeatedly said he doesn’t want the U.S. to do? Is this a game that is cathartic, educational, or just ghoulish?”  The game designers claim that the purpose of the game is to help us experience the events of bin Laden’s death in a way that photos and news articles can’t do: through interactive experience.  Videogames present an opportunity for powerful virtual experiences that have emotional potency but exist safely in interactive fantasy.

It’s true that some might play this game with different motivation.  There are some who may get a sick sense of pleasure out of killing unarmed civilians.  With any art medium there is the danger that it will be enjoyed outside of the intention of the artist.  This liability is the byproduct of a free society, and there should be boundaries that we decide upon as a society as to how far games can go.  Mostly, we are drawn to these games because there is still that child in us who is unsure and afraid of a world beyond our control.

These games teach us not only about the world but about ourselves.  As I said before, I never played the Robber; I was always the Cop.  When I look back on those games I can see now there was another fear hidden inside that little boy: the fear of seeing anything dark or scary in myself.  Each of us struggles with issues deep within ourselves and games can be a source of empowerment and a way to overcome the stumbling blocks along our life path.  They help us face our fears.  They teach us to problem solve and overcome obstacles.  Just as children’s play develops these skills, videogames at their best have the power to do the same for teenagers and adults.

These games can also lead us to ask difficult questions.  They should help us explore moral possibilities.  It is for this reason that I find myself now, as a self-avowed pacifist, defending violent games.  The real ethical question is not “is it wrong to play as a bad guy” but “how should justice be carried out?”  We should be asking “what kind of war is just” and “is vengeance the same as justice.”

So yes, I will play the “Osama bin Laden kill game.”

And I will take my turn playing the Robber.

Featured

Games

Headline

KumaWar

Previous Post



May 30, 2011

Citizenship Confusion: Memorial Day, Kevin DeYoung, and How to be Patriotic

Next Post



May 31, 2011 On the Other Hand: Jealousy of Youth is No Surprise


Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Asides Elsewhere Featured Film Games General Culture Headline Literature Music Of the Moment Podcast Politics RetroPost Sports Technology Television Uncategorized Viral

Select a Month February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007




TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Which Christian movement is called "Holiness" and focuses on personal sanctification?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Anglican Eastern Orthodox Pentecostal Wesleyan/Methodist

Related posts from Christ and Pop Culture

Evangelical

Christ and Pop Culture Has Moved!

Christ and Pop Culture

Evangelical

Downton Abbey: People Talk

Christ and Pop Culture

Evangelical

Walking with the Dead: Living on Borrowed Faith

Christ and Pop Culture

Evangelical

ABCFamily's "The Fosters" and the Power of Adoption

Christ and Pop Culture

TRENDING AT PATHEOS Evangelical

The REST of Your Life: A Creative Wrestles...

This week I had a conversation with a good friend from church....

How the author of the world's best hymn...

I've been working with John Newton for a while now. This makes...

Psalm 130 | Lectio Divina

Long before this Lectio Divina, Psalm 130 - the song - started...

What About the Trees? Another Living Parable

After I finished writing the last article about falling leaves as a...

Why Classical Education Is a Conversation, Not a...

Come and Read: Joy in Classical Education When I was a little...

What Happened at Cornell?

Cornell University has received a great deal of negative publicity and intense...

view all Evangelical blogs

Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Copyright 2008-2026, Patheos. All rights reserved.

Subscription Support Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube