Appetite for Production: Is There Such a Thing as Too Much Content?

Last updated on: December 16, 2010 at 11:22 am by Guest Contributor

Appetite for Production: Is There Such a Thing as Too Much Content? 2010-12-16T11:22:03-07:00 Guest Contributor

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Consider these realities of our digital world:

According to Pingdom.com, 12.5 billion videos are viewed each month on YouTube. We’re watching nearly 200 videos on computers, cell phones, iPads, and other digital gear every month.
Twitter claims that tweets rose from 5000 a day in 2007 to 50 million tweets a day this year – 600 tweets per second!
My fourteen-year old daughter edits more (and arguably better) video on her laptop than I did in four years as a film student in college.

Our means, as well as our craving, for media is growing exponentially, today anyone with a computer or a cell phone (and that’s everyone) can contribute to the steady drip of noise. But what happens when supply overwhelms demand, when the stuff we are producing spills over the rim of what society can drink in? Our ability to hear vital messages among the heavy overgrowth of the less-than-vital is a casualty of our times we may not even recognize. To the one with the global platform, every message seems urgent.

J. R. R. Tolkien was a keen believer in content creation; his Middle-earth mythology lovingly grew out of his personal theology that we are sub-creators. Like his angelic Valar, we are allies with God under his direction in a great symphony of creation. To Tolkien, participating in the act of sub-creating connects us to our image-bearing nature as children of the Creator. But does this mean that every kid with a Flip cam and a Wi-Fi network is an echo of the Divine image? Not exactly. For Tolkien, it was never just about producing output. He was more absorbed with adding to the Story – affirming our place and our struggle inside God’s narrative. From The Hobbit to his unfinished works, whether we encounter eagles, orcs, ents, or elves, Tolkien provides possibly the best starting point for would-be sub-creators: our impulse to create seems to be about the sacred privilege of being a messenger, and humble task of holding up a mirror to glorious and fallen humanity. So what are the lessons to be had here in this new digital landscape, and how do we tread cautiously yet confidently?

First, we ought to recognize that in any communication between people – whether face to face or via Ethernet – there are at least two very compelling needs in us that drive our messages: a longing to be heard, and a longing to belong. The kid uploading his video rant about what happened at school is not too different from the middle-aged housewife reconnecting with her high school pals on Facebook. They both are expressing something fundamental in us that says, “Listen to me! I have a story!” In creating unique and intensely niche-oriented content, we are asking, “Who’s with me?” We are reaching out to an invisible community, and hoping someone else is reaching back. The environment of social networks, blogs, and other new media enable us to search for belonging and a voice in ways only ten years ago were unheard of. To discount this search is to ignore a fundamental and noble part of who we are.

Secondly, we need to become better listeners, embracing an intentional listening that begins to sift through the deluge of noise thrown at us each day. Over 400 years before you accepted your ex-girlfriend’s mom’s friend request, St. John of the Cross suggested, “it is great wisdom to know how to be silent and to look at neither the remarks, nor the deeds, nor the lives of others.” There is a real danger of vital messages becoming lost in the ether, but a healthy practice of shutting off the cell phone, fasting from Twitter, and checking email less frequently slowly re-trains us to listen to content for meaning, and not merely for mass.

In the mid-fifties, the Swanson company released a quaint little product – a single serving meal you could heat up in a few minutes, eat by the warm glow of the Zenith, and toss in the trash when you were done. TV dinners fed our growing appetite for the cheap, easy, and tasty – three words that could describe the digital buffet of our times. Creating, communicating, and even consuming are gifts bestowed on clever creatures who often get easily distracted. The challenge for us is not to deny our appetites, but to champion the cause of the satisfied.

Garrett Brown adds to the noise on Twitter @GarrettBrown2.

Featured

Headline

Technology

Previous Post

December 15, 2010

Christ and Pop Culture’s Guide to Christmas

Next Post

December 17, 2010 Our Ten Favorite Video Games of 2010

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Asides Elsewhere Featured Film Games General Culture Headline Literature Music Of the Moment Podcast Politics RetroPost Sports Technology Television Uncategorized Viral

Select a Month February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz