Must our Art be Uplifting?

Last updated on: October 19, 2010 at 2:51 pm by Drew Dixon

Must our Art be Uplifting? 2010-10-19T14:51:19-06:00 Drew Dixon

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Flannery O’Conner responds to an accusation from a reader that her stories were not meeting the needs of the “tired reader” who comes home and wants to be uplifted:

And his need, of course, is to be lifted up. There is something in us, as storytellers and as listeners to stories, that demands the redemptive act, that demands what falls at least be offered the chance to be restored. The reader of today looks for this motion, and rightly so, but what he has forgotten is the cost of it. His sense of evil is diluted or lacking altogether, and so he has forgotten the price of restoration. When he reads a novel, he wants either his senses tormented or his spirits raised. He wants to be transported, instantly, either to mock damnation or a mock innocence (“The Grotesque in Southern Fiction,” Mystery and Manners, 48-49).

This brings up an important point for the storyteller–to truly write that which expresses redemption or at least offers it, one must understand something of the darkness of the world we live in. I think there is a faulty assumption among evangelicals that “uplifting” art is a necessary adjective for the art which a Christian produces. Taking cues from O’Connor this would seem to inadequately appreciate the horror that was the cross. Christ’s humble self-sacrifice at the hands of lawless men was the darkest hour the world has ever known. Our redemption cost Jesus his life and more importantly his standing with the father–we will never truly appreciate the victory gained for us on the cross unless we truly understand its horror. Thus art that only and always lifts up offers a “mock innocence” as redemption which isn’t costly is no redemption at all and thus fails to adequately understand the value of redemption.

O’Connor illustrates the tension that inevitably follows from such a conviction:

The problem for such a novelist will be to know how far he can distort without destroying, and in order not to destroy, he will have to descend far enough into himself to reach those underground springs that give life to his work. This descent into himself will, at the same time, be a descent into his region. It will be a descent through the darkness of the familiar into a world where, like the blind man cured in the gospels, he sees men as if they were trees, but walking. This is the beginning of vision, and I feel it is a vision which we in the South must at least try to understand if we want to participate in the continuance of a vital Southern literature. . . . I hate to think of the day when the Southern writer will satisfy the reader” (50).

This is not to say anything against art that is predominately uplifting, but I do think that if we are interested in a “vital” art, we must take O’Connor’s encouragement to know our world and be gravely aware of its darkness. We need to at least be asking the question, “how far may we distort without destroying,” lest we submit a redemption that costs nothing.

Asides

Previous Post

October 19, 2010

RetroPost: Fallout 3 & The Challenge of a Gaming Morality

Next Post

October 20, 2010 Dexter: We Are All Serial Killers Inside

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Asides Elsewhere Featured Film Games General Culture Headline Literature Music Of the Moment Podcast Politics RetroPost Sports Technology Television Uncategorized Viral

Select a Month February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz