Patheos

BuddhistCatholicContemplativeEvangelicalGeneral ChristianHinduJewishLatter-day SaintMuslimNew VisionsProgressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Patheos

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Christ and Pop Culture

The CaPC Water Cooler: “I don’t know that Glee needed to redeem itself.”

Last updated on: December 10, 2009 at 3:43 pm   by CAPC Writers

The CaPC Water Cooler: “I don’t know that Glee needed to redeem itself.” 2009-12-10T15:43:40-07:00 CAPC Writers

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Read the other entries in this installment of the water cooler.

Ben writes,

I don’t know that Glee needed to redeem itself… I like the show overall. That said, I always appreciate it when a storyteller can both tie up loose ends AND up the ante, and that definitely happened in this case. They certainly didn’t back down from making things more complex even as former tensions are resolved. Speaking of assumptions, haven’t we all been assuming Rachel and Finn were pretty much destined for each other? And yet in short order Finn has both resisted her advances and declared his love for Quinn. Intense!

As far as complaints, I do have two. First, I thought it was a somewhat ugly moment when Emma explained the actions of Will’s wife by saying, “You’re a lot to lose, Will.” This is ridiculous flattery and seems to promote condescension in Will, as in, “Perhaps I should show her grace because let’s face it, who could stand to lose me?” It is a call to look on one’s spouse with pity because they are a desperate, lesser person. While the show has certainly spent a lot of time making exactly that point, it’s not the right way for someone in Will’s position to handle that problem.

The other complaint has to do with the, “Who said anything about divorce?” line. Though I think your analysis is dead-on and extremely insightful, it bothered me that the line was directed toward Emma. Emma has done a lot to stay completely above board throughout the show; she has found small ways to separate herself from Will whenever they become to close, she has avoided giving him poisonous or unhelpful advice, and in that particular moment she was even gently defending Will’s wife.

Meanwhile, Will has been flirty and cute with Emma, given her special attention and praise, put her in compromising positions (the man should never have invited her to help with cleaning, put chalk on her nose, gone to see her wedding dresses, asked her to be a special guest judge, etc…), and just been uncareful or unaware of his effect on her.

So when he self-righteously says, “Who said anything about divorce?” I think she has a lot more to be insulted about than him. If the show acknowledges this in future episodes, great. But if they try to make it out like he’s being the Boy Scout and she the unreasonable one, I’ll be annoyed.

Asides

Uncategorized

Previous Post



December 10, 2009

Mass Effect 2 Is Full Of Stars

Next Post



December 10, 2009 Deconstructing Hairography & Mattress


Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Asides Elsewhere Featured Film Games General Culture Headline Literature Music Of the Moment Podcast Politics RetroPost Sports Technology Television Uncategorized Viral

Select a Month February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007




TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What happened when the Israelites saved the with leftover manna?

Select your answer to see how you score.

It melted It fed animals It turned to gold It bred worms and stank

Related posts from Christ and Pop Culture

Evangelical

God And Country Music: New Avett Brothers Album...

Christ and Pop Culture

Evangelical

The Last Battle of The Civil Wars

Christ and Pop Culture

Evangelical

God and Country Music: Traditionalism as a Shadow...

Christ and Pop Culture

Evangelical

The Kiddy Pool: Only Children Are Lonely and...

Christ and Pop Culture

TRENDING AT PATHEOS Evangelical

The REST of Your Life: A Creative Wrestles...

This week I had a conversation with a good friend from church....

How the author of the world's best hymn...

I've been working with John Newton for a while now. This makes...

Psalm 130 | Lectio Divina

Long before this Lectio Divina, Psalm 130 - the song - started...

What About the Trees? Another Living Parable

After I finished writing the last article about falling leaves as a...

Why Classical Education Is a Conversation, Not a...

Come and Read: Joy in Classical Education When I was a little...

What Happened at Cornell?

Cornell University has received a great deal of negative publicity and intense...

view all Evangelical blogs

Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Copyright 2008-2026, Patheos. All rights reserved.

Subscription Support Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube