Patheos

BuddhistCatholicContemplativeEvangelicalGeneral ChristianHinduJewishLatter-day SaintMuslimNew VisionsProgressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Patheos

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Christ and Pop Culture

Is 'Wild Things' Too Dark, or are Disney Films Too Light?

Last updated on: October 19, 2009 at 7:49 am   by Richard Clark

Is 'Wild Things' Too Dark, or are Disney Films Too Light? 2009-10-19T07:49:11-06:00 Richard Clark

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Shortly before Where the Wild Things Are came to theaters, speculation began to surface that the film was too dark for young children. Many early reviews seemed to back up this claim, suggesting that the film was too dark, depressive and emotionally confusing for children. It seemed, to the average parent, that it was time to take the PG rating seriously.

Parental guidance is a good idea for this film. The reviewers may be right in some cases: there may in fact be children out there that simply don’t understand this film. They may become too frightened for the rest of the film to matter, or they may see an example to follow in any amount of bad behavior exhibited in the film. It’s possible that this could be too much for them.

But here’s the thing: the things that make this movie scary, or a possible bad influence, are simply a part of real life. And no, this isn’t the kind of “real life” we try not to expose our kids to. This is the kind of real life that our kids are exposed to on a daily basis: joy turns to humiliation in an instant, those we most love seem to turn on us for no reason, and our fantasies and/or hopes about life come crashing down around us. If anything, we are projecting onto our kids: it doesn’t freak them out so much as it does us. We have forgotten how awful it can feel to be nine years old, while they are living it every day.

Earlier in the week, I watched two Disney films with my wife: Snow White and  Pinocchio. Snow White is a truly great film, pulling off a sweet, simply story on an emotional and artistic level that nothing like it had yet reached. Pinocchio, after having grown up loving the film, was a resounding disappointment – a confused, unfocused mess of a cartoon. Though the characters can be charming, it’s a wooden joke of a  story that has no desire to become real.

Among these two movies, we see a fairly stark contrast between the traditional “children’s film” that Disney has made so popular and the more risky and daring Where the Wild Things Are. While both films are fantastical stories, the difference lies in the degree to which the films strive to remain truthful despite their fantasy settings.

In Disney’s films, we get all sorts of promises that cannot possibly be kept. If we sincerely dream our dreams, they will come true. True love conquers even death. Villains are easily spotted and the those who aren’t villains are genuinely good. These are the principles on which Walt Disney himself, the most famous and most influential humanist, founded the children’s film, and they remain even today.

Christians then, while still finding value in much traditional fare, should welcome the subversive, edgy children’s film with open arms; especially one like Wild Things. Max’s dreams are simple, domestic dreams: he wants his mother’s undivided attention and his sister’s friends’ approval (not to mention his absent dad’s presence). And yet, he (and the Wild Things themselves) finds that even in his escapist trip to visit the Wild Things, these dreams are unattainable and unrealistic.

Max’s villains all basically mean well, and their identities change according to the wishes of Max himself, making it clear that Max could actually rid his world of villains if he only wanted less. Those villains turn into heroes in the course of the film, though they often are powerless to save him from much of life’s little humiliations: “I would have done something,” says Max’s mother when he complains that his sister did nothing to stop her friends from terrorizing him. It is perhaps the most useless and heartwarming sentiment in the entire film. For Max, those words are enough, because they have to be.

I have nothing against escapist fantasy, to a point. There is only so much escapism one should embrace, however. The Disney brand of escapism is far more than merely imagining ourselves in a different time and place. It’s an escapism that denies foundational truths about the world – it’s a head in the sand escapism that does no one any long term good.

Where the Wild Things Are is only dark because it’s truthful about life, though it’s also hopeful. Max runs back to his family because it’s his home, not because they are perfect, or because they fulfill his wildest dreams. You never get the sense that Max lives happily ever after in his home, but you do get the sense that his family will do their best to love him and that he will do the same for them. In this broken world, that’s the best we can ask for.

Featured

Film

Headline

Previous Post



October 16, 2009

Podcast #63: If This Were a Western, Michael Moore Would be the Bad Guy

Next Post



October 19, 2009 What a Ride


Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Asides Elsewhere Featured Film Games General Culture Headline Literature Music Of the Moment Podcast Politics RetroPost Sports Technology Television Uncategorized Viral

Select a Month February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007




TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Who was swallowed by a great fish after being thrown overboard?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Jonah Saul Noah David

Related posts from Christ and Pop Culture

Evangelical

Christ and Pop Culture Has Moved!

Christ and Pop Culture

Evangelical

Downton Abbey: People Talk

Christ and Pop Culture

Evangelical

Walking with the Dead: Living on Borrowed Faith

Christ and Pop Culture

Evangelical

ABCFamily's "The Fosters" and the Power of Adoption

Christ and Pop Culture

TRENDING AT PATHEOS Evangelical

The REST of Your Life: A Creative Wrestles...

This week I had a conversation with a good friend from church....

How the author of the world's best hymn...

I've been working with John Newton for a while now. This makes...

Psalm 130 | Lectio Divina

Long before this Lectio Divina, Psalm 130 - the song - started...

What About the Trees? Another Living Parable

After I finished writing the last article about falling leaves as a...

Why Classical Education Is a Conversation, Not a...

Come and Read: Joy in Classical Education When I was a little...

What Happened at Cornell?

Cornell University has received a great deal of negative publicity and intense...

view all Evangelical blogs

Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Copyright 2008-2026, Patheos. All rights reserved.

Subscription Support Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube