Patheos

BuddhistCatholicContemplativeEvangelicalGeneral ChristianHinduJewishLatter-day SaintMuslimNew VisionsProgressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Patheos

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Christ and Pop Culture

The Dangers of Dumb Movies

Last updated on: July 20, 2009 at 7:41 am   by Richard Clark

The Dangers of Dumb Movies 2009-07-20T07:41:31-06:00 Richard Clark

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

The onslaught of summer movies, most notably the critically reviled but blockbusting Transformers 2, has renewed the argument over whether or not a movie can be just good fun and still be fun. Our own Charles Jones has already weighed in on this debate, defending Transformers 2 and its’ lack of any incredibly thought-provoking plot points or moral messages. He makes some excellent points in the process, and it’s worth reading over his article if you haven’t already.

I’m one of those people that has little patience for bad films. Part of this is a sinful desire to puff myself up appearing smart, artistic, and thoughtful to others. However, for the most part, my dislike of films is something I believe is altogether justified and an exercise in prudence.

After all, despite what some may think, films aren’t bad because they break some arbitrary rules that were thought up by critics. Films can be bad because they undermine the story itself or the audience’s viewing experience. This is an unfortunate mishap, but I am also fairly lenient when it comes to these mishaps. They are harmless. The worse they accomplish is keeping the film from becoming great.

However, there are other, more sinister attributes that might cause a film to be viewed by critics and thoughtful consumers as “bad.” For instance, a film may subvert its’ own message by telling its’ story in a way that conflicts (i.e. The Kingdom, wherein you spend 90 minutes being entertained by an attempt to “kill them all,” only to be told in the end that you should have been disgusted instead). A film can be so clear-cut and obvious as to be preachy and unrealistic, resulting in a lesson that would only be valuable in the film-world in which it has been presented (i.e. the numerous teen movies in which believing in oneself inevitably results in success). A film can also present a unified but morally abhorrant message, resulting in a movie which is simply less truthful and worse off for it (i.e. The Davinci Code, Brokeback Mountain, and pretty much any other movie that has been protested by the church).

Finally, a movie can be bad because it is dumb. Many would argue this point, claiming that every movie need not be the work of a genius. I should point out, however, the distinction between a dumb movie and a simple or silly movie. While simple films can often be thought provoking and sincere (Up, any other Pixar film), and silly movies are often painstakingly crafted and thoughtfully subversive (Zoolander, Monty Python), dumb movies are made either by dumb people or (more likely) people who stifle their artistic potential for the sake of appealing to the lowest common denominator. Rather than making an effort to appeal to our virtues (I would argue this is one mark of true art), they tend to appeal to our vices. Their movies thrive off of simple formulas that are known to cause audiences to flock to the theaters: existing franchises, large explosions, crude and gross humor, slapstick comedy, sexual exploitation, sentimental manipulation of emotions, and simplified plot-lines.

Many of these traits are fine when used sparingly, but when a movie relies solely on these things to carry a movie for its entire duration, there is a serious danger for the viewer: the movie does not ask us or challenge us to think. In fact, it is in the movie’s best interest that we don’t, or else we might realize that the plot actually makes little sense, that we are being manipulated, or that Megan Fox is being exploited in a most horrific way.

Our susceptibility to these attitudes in not inevitable by any means, but it certainly results in what can only be called a bad film. It demands nothing of us except that we passively accept what they offer. It results in a viewing audience that is in general worse off for having watched it. It is cynically produced with no concern in mind besides the financial windfall that will result.

The greatest danger of these movies is not what they are but what they do to us. They give us permission and at worst train us not to think about what we’re watching. As Christians, we don’t have this option. We are charged to remain sober and vigilant and to judge all things by scripture and the gospel. Does this mean we must concoct touching spiritual metaphors based on everything we see? No. But it does mean that if we ever find ourselves being taken on a ride by a movie about giant fighting robots, it’s best to either take control or jump off.

Featured

Film

Headline

bestof

Cultural Appreciation

Previous Post



July 19, 2009

Balance Your Media Diet

Next Post



July 20, 2009 Can't we just turn it off for now?


Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Asides Elsewhere Featured Film Games General Culture Headline Literature Music Of the Moment Podcast Politics RetroPost Sports Technology Television Uncategorized Viral

Select a Month February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007




TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

How did Saul first offend God as king?

Select your answer to see how you score.

He offered sacrifices himself He built an idol He took the Ark He defeated the Philistines

Related posts from Christ and Pop Culture

Evangelical

Christ and Pop Culture Has Moved!

Christ and Pop Culture

Evangelical

Downton Abbey: People Talk

Christ and Pop Culture

Evangelical

Walking with the Dead: Living on Borrowed Faith

Christ and Pop Culture

Evangelical

ABCFamily's "The Fosters" and the Power of Adoption

Christ and Pop Culture

TRENDING AT PATHEOS Evangelical

The REST of Your Life: A Creative Wrestles...

This week I had a conversation with a good friend from church....

How the author of the world's best hymn...

I've been working with John Newton for a while now. This makes...

Psalm 130 | Lectio Divina

Long before this Lectio Divina, Psalm 130 - the song - started...

What About the Trees? Another Living Parable

After I finished writing the last article about falling leaves as a...

Why Classical Education Is a Conversation, Not a...

Come and Read: Joy in Classical Education When I was a little...

What Happened at Cornell?

Cornell University has received a great deal of negative publicity and intense...

view all Evangelical blogs

Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Copyright 2008-2026, Patheos. All rights reserved.

Subscription Support Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube