Gamer's Choice

Last updated on: April 30, 2009 at 7:33 am by Richard Clark

Gamer's Choice 2009-04-30T07:33:41-06:00 Richard Clark

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

“I didn’t have a choice!”

It’s a common reprise, presented primarily as an excuse for making what was, in fact a wrong choice. This phrase is recalled after one is caught cheating on a test, after a spouse files for divorce, after compromises are made by church leaders, after a scared young woman seeks out an abortion, etc. Each and every time, the phrase is used to assure others and oneself that their respective choice was not merely reasonable, but inevitable.

Justifying the various wrongs we have committed in our lives (of which I have committed many) is one of the things we excel at as human beings. Because we are both intelligent and sinful, we are incredibly deceptive, not only fooling others but ourselves into feeling that certain moral choices are actually just inevitable results of circumstance. We see this attitude running rampant in various films, television shows, and novels that point out just how hard the sinner’s plight is. We are told that things are never black and white, that we live in a world of grey areas. And because it is film and television, we have to sit there and take it. Sometimes we can write articles about it.

This is not the case with the new medium on the block. Video games, as they begin to mature into something that has the potential for true artistic expression, have begun to challenge the mainstream in various ways, intentionally or not. With the recent flood of games that advertise the ability to make various moral decisions, the concept of choice is being clarified for anyone who will take the time to play them.

Three games in particular have become known for the ability to make such choices. In Bioshock, you are forced to choose between “harvesting” (or killing) little zombified girls in order to further your own goals or rescuing them. In Fable 2, you face a more arbitrary and vague, but nonetheless gutwrenching choice between (spoiler!) saving your family, friends and dog, or saving millions of those who have died previously. In Fallout 3, well, you face a myriad of choices. Some of them are easy and some are not.

These games, and their treatment of moral choice, are not flawless. Often the choices seem a bit too black and white. The systems that decide whether or not you made an ethical choice are obviously not based on a strictly Christian ethic, and it goes without saying that anyone who doesn’t agree with the developer’s ethical system will find themselves frustrated that they are losing karma, or purity points for what they have deemed to be the right decision.

Further, the concept of karma, morality points, or purity points illustrates another disconnect: in real life, we never really know if we made the right decision. In the game world, however, it tells us immediately whether we are a good or a bad person. We walk through our video game lives with a very certain sense of either self-righteousness or regret. Pull up a status screen and it will confirm our moral status. Fable 2 told me I was angelic. Fallout 3 told me I was “very good.” So, awesome. I won’t have to worry about that.

What I would like to see instead is for games to present us with these moral choices that have real consequences on the game world and the gameplay, but that don’t have an opinion on whether we did the right thing or not. If I kill everyone in Tranquility lane in order to put them out of their misery, I want to have to live with that choice without the game telling me I’ve gotten 2% more “good” because of it. I want there to be the possibility that everyone will hate me for doing the right thing, rather than magically sense how good I am. In short, I want to struggle with the human condition, and I want to do it in a video game.

Some will bristle at these ideas. They want video games to be purely an esapist activity. They don’t want to have to deal with the real world when they’re playing these games. To that I say: there are games for that. But a steady diet of escapism isn’t healthy for anyone, and the Christian needs to be thinking hard about the games they play, not ignoring reality.

I don’t believe these ideas to be pipe dreams. They will become realities in the near future, and video games will continue on the road to becoming more serious and having even more potential to make us think critically about themselves and our own lives. This is, after all, what good art does: it forces us to reflect seriously about the choices we have made both in the game and in our lives. We simply don’t have a choice.

Previous Post

April 29, 2009

Twitter for the Local Church

Next Post

April 30, 2009 Religion as Buffet

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Asides Elsewhere Featured Film Games General Culture Headline Literature Music Of the Moment Podcast Politics RetroPost Sports Technology Television Uncategorized Viral

Select a Month February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz