Left 4 Dead and Relearning "Gaming"

Last updated on: February 4, 2009 at 7:19 am by Alan Noble

Left 4 Dead and Relearning "Gaming" 2009-02-04T07:19:22-07:00 Alan Noble

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Cooperative gaming has been around for a long time, from Gauntlet in the arcade to Double Dragon on the NES. The draw of this style of gameplay is that you can play with a friend (as opposed to taking turns) in a non-competitive way. If you have a friend over who has never played Halo multiplayer, you can always play split screen co-op through the campaign and both have a good time. In addition to “story” or “campaign” co-op, modern multiplayer games usually include a “team” mode which encourages cooperation, modes like “Capture the Flag” or team “deathmatch” or “slayer.” In these modes teams benefit from working together against the opposing team. In practice, this often results in a competition to see who can get the most kills on a single team. Your “opponents” might technically be the opposing team, but actually every player in the game becomes (to some extent at least) a challenger to your score (whether that be flag captures or kills). In my experience gaming, I have had only few matches where I honestly felt like I was working together with a group of players to achieve something as a team instead of seeking a high score against other players. For Christmas, my (lovely) wife got me Left 4 Dead, and since that time my conception of cooperative game play, and gaming in general, have changed.

The conceit of Left 4 Dead is that you are playing one of four main characters in a series of four zombie apocalypse “movies.” The premise of each movie is the same (playing off of the campy-ness of zombie movies): you have to fight your way through an environment to an extraction point where some element of the government will rescue you; in other words, your job is to survive.

What makes this premise so successful is that survival is all but impossible (except on the lowest difficulty setting) without the assistance of the other three players. Taking a cue from 28 Days Later, the zombies (or “infected” as they are called in the game) in Left 4 Dead move quickly, very quickly, and are aided by “special infected” who have various abilities and greater health and stregth. If you get attacked by enough infected humans, or get pounced on, grabbed, or knocked down by a special infected, you will soon die unless a teammate comes to your aid. The item-mechanic of the game, which allows teammates to heal each other and give each other some items, also encourages teamwork and selflessness. What this means is that the player is constantly looking out for his or her teammates. The impulse to run ahead of the team so that you can get more kills is quickly tempered by the knowledge that if you get separated from your team, you will die fairly quickly.

Playing Left 4 Dead with my wife and friends over the last few weeks has taught me a bit about how I conceive of gaming as a past time. My most basic impulse in gaming is to win, primarily to win alone. If at all possible, I’d rather be the one player in a Halo Team Slayer match who holds up the entire team than to just do my share. In other words, whether I am playing a single player RPG or a multiplayer FPS, I am primarily concerned with my personal gaming experience. I might enjoy the company of the friends I am playing with, but to a large extent, my pleasure comes from my performance. Left 4 Dead has challenged this perception in me by forcing me to not be a selfish player. When I play the game, my greatest enjoyment comes when the team works as a unit, against incredible zombie odds, to survive a campaign.

While Left 4 Dead is not a perfect game and is not for the easily offended (there is a lot of blood—obviously—and some profanity), it does demonstrate to me that as gaming becomes more of a social act, what it means to “game” and the reasons we “game” will change. Ten years ago I played games to win, as a personal challenge. What Left 4 Dead shows is that there is a future in gaming that moves us away from a conception of “gaming” as a private (or at least privately motivated) action to a social event motivated by the desire to share a common experience.

Previous Post

February 2, 2009

Superbowl: a relic of modernism?

Next Post

February 4, 2009 I'm on the fence.

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Asides Elsewhere Featured Film Games General Culture Headline Literature Music Of the Moment Podcast Politics RetroPost Sports Technology Television Uncategorized Viral

Select a Month February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz