Patheos

BuddhistCatholicContemplativeEvangelicalGeneral ChristianHinduJewishLatter-day SaintMuslimNew VisionsProgressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Patheos

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Christ and Pop Culture

Hamlet 2: Is “Rock Me, Sexy Jesus” Blasphemous?

Last updated on: September 2, 2008 at 11:37 am   by Carrisa Smith

Hamlet 2: Is “Rock Me, Sexy Jesus” Blasphemous? 2008-09-02T11:37:27-06:00 Carrisa Smith

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

If you’ve heard anything about the movie Hamlet 2, it’s probably the ridiculously chipper chords of “Rock Me, Sexy Jesus,” the key number in the titular high-school-musical-within-a-movie. The song, usually taken out of context, has drawn the ire of Christians and earned the film the coveted “abhorrent” rating from the previously discussed MovieGuide.org.

Is the song—and, by extension, the film—actually blasphemy? Short answer: I don’t think so. Nevertheless, as the chorus constantly loops through my head, I’m still trying to keep myself from singing it.

 

To understand the song, you have to know the context, both the context of the film and the context of the groups of people the film is skewering (Christians are actually some of the least frequent targets of the movie’s barbs).

Here’s the film context: Dana Marschz (played by Steve Coogan, a comedian who is to the Brits something like what Steve Carell is to Americans) is a sad fool of a high school drama teacher who decides to write a sequel to Hamlet. “A sequel to Hamlet,” you say? “But don’t all the characters in Hamlet die?” Yes, they do, which is why Marschz inserts a time machine into his plot, so that the prince of Denmark can go back and save everybody else—and, for some reason, hang out with Jesus along the way. The whole concept is dumb. That’s the point. We are meant to laugh at Marschz and his narcissistic “art.”

 

Artists who create solely as a form of personal therapy are one of the prime laughingstocks of Hamlet 2. Marschz has written the play, ostensibly about Hamlet, as an expression of his own pain at being rejected by his father. This is also where Jesus comes in. At the overwrought emotional climax of Marschz’s play, Hamlet forgives his father, followed by Jesus on the cross crying out “Father, I forgive you.” Would it be blasphemous if the film were really saying that God the Father was in need of forgiveness from God the Son? Yes. But that’s not what’s going on. Instead, the moment is simply illustrating the grandiosity of Marschz’s navel-gazing. His obsession with his daddy-issues blinds him from encountering any story own its own merits; somehow, every character, even Jesus, has to be made into a metaphor for his own pain.

 

“Rock Me, Sexy Jesus” also clearly nods to a couple of other “controversial” musicals, most obviously Jesus Christ Superstar. As one character explains it, the song is imagining that, if Jesus came to earth today, he would have to act like a celebrity. Does that sound a little . . . familiar? Derivative? Again, that’s the point. When Marschz is proud of himself for courting controversy, he’s not even being remotely original. In the area of other musical parallels, IMDB proved useful in informing me that one of Hamlet 2’s main actors has appeared previously only in the Broadway cast of Spring Awakening, the 2006 rock musical famous for its frank portrayal of teen sexuality. Marschz’s play is doing nothing new here.

 

If you watch “Rock Me, Sexy Jesus” in context, you know that you’re supposed to be laughing at Dana Marschz, not at Jesus. Hamlet 2’s studio, Focus Features, may be giving a different impression by promoting the song apart from the film, and I can understand why people might not want to support the studio for that reason, but I personally have never been a believer in punishing a film for the sins of its studio.

 

(If you decide to avoid seeing Hamlet 2 in the theaters, a more legitimate consideration might be that it’s not actually that great. It has some hilarious moments, many of them involving the high school’s baby-faced theater critic, but there are also dispensable plot elements that take up too much of the film’s brief 92-minute running time. Much as I admire Catherine Keener, her entire character arc as Marschz’s wife could have been left out, since it only exists to prove what a loser Marschz is. He could quite easily be a loser without ever having a wife in the first place. The movie is worth seeing on DVD, at least if you’re not offended by profanity—there is a lot of that, aside from the blasphemy issue—but probably not worth full theater price.)

 

As I mentioned earlier, though, I’m not entirely comfortable singing “Rock Me, Sexy Jesus” myself. It may not be blasphemous in the context of the film, but I still feel like I might be taking the Lord’s name in vain when I sing it. On the other hand, I’m amused beyond all reason by Homer Simpson’s line “Save me, Jeebus!” and find myself repeating it in times of trial, so maybe I’m just a hypocrite.

Featured

Film

Previous Post



September 1, 2008

Vonnegut's Breakfast... and so on.

Next Post



September 2, 2008 R.I.P. Don LaFontaine


Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Asides Elsewhere Featured Film Games General Culture Headline Literature Music Of the Moment Podcast Politics RetroPost Sports Technology Television Uncategorized Viral

Select a Month February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007




TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

True or False: Romans teaches that all Israel will be saved.

Select your answer to see how you score.

FALSE TRUE

Related posts from Christ and Pop Culture

Evangelical

Christ and Pop Culture Has Moved!

Christ and Pop Culture

Evangelical

Downton Abbey: People Talk

Christ and Pop Culture

Evangelical

Walking with the Dead: Living on Borrowed Faith

Christ and Pop Culture

Evangelical

ABCFamily's "The Fosters" and the Power of Adoption

Christ and Pop Culture

TRENDING AT PATHEOS Evangelical

Creation as Secondary to Judgment

Creating is a most human act. A good canonical (classical) education will...

The REST of Your Life: A Creative Wrestles...

This week I had a conversation with a good friend from church....

How the author of the world's best hymn...

I've been working with John Newton for a while now. This makes...

Psalm 130 | Lectio Divina

Long before this Lectio Divina, Psalm 130 - the song - started...

What About the Trees? Another Living Parable

After I finished writing the last article about falling leaves as a...

Why Classical Education Is a Conversation, Not a...

Come and Read: Joy in Classical Education When I was a little...

view all Evangelical blogs

Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Copyright 2008-2026, Patheos. All rights reserved.

Subscription Support Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube