Patheos

BuddhistCatholicContemplativeEvangelicalGeneral ChristianHinduJewishLatter-day SaintMuslimNew VisionsProgressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Patheos

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Christ and Pop Culture

Getting Our Bearings: A Review of "The Golden Compass"

Last updated on: December 12, 2007 at 12:07 pm   by Dave Dunham

Getting Our Bearings: A Review of "The Golden Compass" 2007-12-12T12:07:49-07:00 Dave Dunham

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

“When Polar Bears Attack” is not the name of a new Fox Television reality show. It is instead the only remotely interesting part in an otherwise confused, tiresome, and overly-hyped film. The Golden Compass directed by Chris Weitz, was billed as another Lord of the Rings-esque fantasy epic film. It falls far short.

For months we’ve been hearing, reading, and talking about the dangers of Philip Pullman’s atheistic children’s literary trilogy His Dark Materials. In particular we’ve been hearing about these books, which came out in the late 90s but are only now gaining American publicity as New Line Cinemas produced the film adaptation of the first of the books. Christians were preparing for protests, evangelical authors were publishing books intended to give insight to Christian parents, and theologians were talking about Pullman’s atheism on the airwaves.

But in all the hype and concern it never seemed to occur to anyone that the movie might actually be bad. And it is. On opening night The Golden Compass bombed in North America. And for those of us who did have the misfortune of suffering through this film we can probably all agree that it fails because – much like atheism itself – it has no heart.

The story is of an orphan, Lyra Belacqua, who resides at the prestigious Jordan College. She and this college are in a parallel world, one much like our own but a bit more dated. In this world every human being has a “daemon” which is somewhat like their soul in animal form walking and talking alongside them. Also in this world is the Magisterium, the ruling authority (in the books this is blatantly identified as the church, though in the film this concept is almost completely lost). The Magisterium have been in control for centuries, but when Lyra’s uncle Lord Asriel begins a quest to discover the power of “Dust” it sends the Magisterium into a frenzy and they send their most fearsome agent, Miss Coulter, to seize Lyra, who possesses the alethiometer (the one remaining “truth compass”) and to put a stop to Lord Asriel’s endeavors. There’s a host of other interesting characters, including water gypsies, aeronauts, and, of course, the armored bears.

What makes a good fantasy (book or film) is the awe and wonder of it all. That fantastical aspect that draws you into another world, creates deep affections for characters, and contains the elements of the grandiose and inspiring. The Golden Compass lacks all of these things. The story, which in the books is actually very well written, loses its audience throughout the film. It feels confusing and unsure of itself. It made my companions and I feel as though we walked in on a conversation that had already been taking place for five minutes. What did we miss? The books carry a back story that amazingly crafts a world of intrigue, mystery, suspense, and, yes even, affection. The movie, for the sake of time (which I appreciate), attempted to pull the most important scenes from the book and adapt them for film. This is common for any film adaptation (see both Lord of the Rings and Harry Potter for examples). But for some reason the screenplay writers of Compass lost the logical flow of the story itself in the midst of their compressing. There is no heart to this film. It is cold and stilted.

While I will heartily disagree with Philip Pullman’s atheism, his ridiculous picture of the church and Christianity, and his pathetic arguments against God, I can at least say he wrote an intriguing story (one that kept me on the edge of my seat quite frequently throughout reading all three volumes). Chris Weitz, however, will have trouble keeping anyone in their seats at all for this film. If Polar Bear attacks are as good as this film gets then I don’t think Christians have much to worry about. This film will entice few to read Pullman’s books, and even fewer to accept the arguments for atheism. Perhaps if Weitz had possessed an alethiometer prior to making this film he would have learned the truth the easy way, and avoided making such a terrible film.

Featured

Film

General Culture

Headline

Literature

Music

RetroPost

Technology

Television

Atheism

Philip Pullman

The Golden Compass

Previous Post



December 11, 2007

A New Paradigm for Christian Politics

Next Post



December 12, 2007 Huckabee Was Wrong


Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Asides Elsewhere Featured Film Games General Culture Headline Literature Music Of the Moment Podcast Politics RetroPost Sports Technology Television Uncategorized Viral

Select a Month February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007




TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What happened to Lot’s wife when she looked back at Sodom?

Select your answer to see how you score.

She turned into a pillar of salt She was swallowed by the earth She went blind She was struck by lightning

Related posts from Christ and Pop Culture

Evangelical

Christ and Pop Culture Has Moved!

Christ and Pop Culture

Evangelical

CAPC Podcast #4: Hot Pockets, Steven Furtick's Elevation...

Christ and Pop Culture

Evangelical

Downton Abbey: People Talk

Christ and Pop Culture

Evangelical

Walking with the Dead: Living on Borrowed Faith

Christ and Pop Culture

TRENDING AT PATHEOS Evangelical

The REST of Your Life: A Creative Wrestles...

This week I had a conversation with a good friend from church....

How the author of the world's best hymn...

I've been working with John Newton for a while now. This makes...

Psalm 130 | Lectio Divina

Long before this Lectio Divina, Psalm 130 - the song - started...

What About the Trees? Another Living Parable

After I finished writing the last article about falling leaves as a...

Why Classical Education Is a Conversation, Not a...

Come and Read: Joy in Classical Education When I was a little...

What Happened at Cornell?

Cornell University has received a great deal of negative publicity and intense...

view all Evangelical blogs

Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Copyright 2008-2026, Patheos. All rights reserved.

Subscription Support Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube