Steven Furtick – God Did Not “Break the Law for Love”

Last updated on: April 8, 2016 at 8:40 pm by Grayson Gilbert

Steven Furtick – God Did Not “Break the Law for Love” 2016-04-08T20:40:22-05:00 Grayson Gilbert

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Capture

Image Credit: www.Stevenfurtick.com; Fair Use Act

Steven Furtick has generally managed to fall just below the radar in giving heretical statements. Sure, his church services are gimmicky and mirror that of a poorly orchestrated youth group (whoever compiled these clips is a genius). Sure, he makes partnerships and supports some people who have not held to orthodox views on the Trinity. Heck, he even jokingly writes a book, having been spurred to do so by John MacArthur (rather than heeding the single-worded rebuke from a man, who’s proven himself to be qualified for decades). But has any of what he has said thus far been overtly heretical? One would truthfully have to comb through hours of his “sermons” to be sure – or they could just watch the following video on his Facebook page.

The issue in question: Steven’s gleefully repeated line near the end, “God broke the Law for love.”

So, God broke the Law for love, eh? Not just the Law, but His Law; the very Law given to the Israelites and now in our possession, that Paul maintains is “…holy, and the commandment is holy, righteous, and good” in Romans 7:12 and “…good if one uses it lawfully” in 1 Tim. 1:8. God broke His own Law?

While one might maintain legitimate distinctions on the purpose of the Law for the believer today – a statement like this ought to startle us. Why? Scripture indicates the only ones to be guilty of breaking God’s own Law is man and that while we are not presently under the Law if found to be in Christ, it is not without purpose or applicability for the New Testament believer. The book of Romans masterfully demonstrates the power and function of the Law to condemn the unbeliever; this is why we find the apex of the book in 8:1, where Paul declares that there is now no condemnation for those who are in Christ Jesus. The remarkable truth of the gospel is bound in these words – for while we were formerly enemies of God due to Adam’s sin (and especially our own), we are now reconciled to the Father through the blood of Christ (See Romans 5).

Yet we aren’t simply relegating the function of the Law to aspects of our inherited and practiced sin-nature; the Law as a whole, whether you accept a Tripartite division or not, is wholly, a profoundly moral piece of literature. For a better explanation of what I am referring to, see Tom Schreiner’s book here where you can read most of it for free.

But the real issue isn’t even Furtick’s assumption of the Law here – but the act of salvation, as he states that the Law was broken in order to demonstrate the love of God. Yet it appears, to the chagrin of many heralding this video that just the opposite happened. More clearly, while we were yet breaking the Law, God demonstrated His love for us by fulfilling that same Law in Christ, through His perfect and willing obedience, the fulfillment of prophecy, and His penal substitutionary atonement. Love was demonstrated – not in the breaking of the Law by God, but in God’s Trinitarian intervention on behalf of the law-breaker.

Law-breakers deserve wrath, yet in Christ are given grace; they are required to pay a debt, yet in Christ that debt has been paid in full; God demands justice and death, yet in Christ justice was exacted and new life was given. Attributing analogous claims of our heavenly Father not caring about the Law in place that He instituted and mercifully gave to an earthly father disobeying traffic laws to save his son (as much as we can all place ourselves in that scenario) is disingenuous to what took place in God’s redemptive plan. It is furthermore disingenuous to God’s character and the need for the cross. God did not so love the world that He broke His own Law; he so loved the world that He gave His only begotten Son, that all believing in Him should not perish, but have eternal life, in the fulfillment of that Law.

Steven Furtick

Elevation Church

Soteriology

Previous Post

March 29, 2016

Do I Have To Go To Church Every Week?

Next Post

April 1, 2016 James White Changing Last Name to Avoid Accusations of “White Privilege”

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category #ShoutYourAbortion 10 Commandments 2016 Election 2017 2020 Election Abortion Accelerate Books Adultery America Andy Stanley Arminianism Ashley Madison Atonement B&H Academic Baptism Barry Horner Beauty Biblical Elders Billy Graham Blog Book Review Bruce Jenner Caitlyn Jenner Calvin Calvinism Cheating Chick-fil-A Children Christ Christian History Christian Living Christian Podcasts Christianity Christmas Church History Church Leadership Civil Disobedience Constitutional Coronavirus Culture Death Demoninations Discipleship Doctrine Doctrine of God Donald Trump Ecclesiology Entertainment Eschatology Ethics Evangelical Evangelism Evil Evolution Fear Forgive Yourself Forgiveness Francis Chan Future Israel Gay Marriage Gender Genesis George Floyd Gospel Government Gun Control Halloween hamartiology Heavenly Reward Hermeneutics History Hollywood Holy Spirit Homeschool Homosexual Homosexuality Hope Hospitality Humor Husband Infant Baptism Interview Jesus John Piper Josh Duggar Joshua Harris Judgment Justice Kathy Griffin Kim Davis Leadership Logic Love Manhood Marriage Martin Luther Messianic Prophecy Miscarriage Mocking Modesty Money Movie Reviews Music Music Review Netflix New Testament Obergefell Old Testament Parenting Pastor Pastoring Persecution Planned Parenthood Podcast Politics Pop Culture Pornography Prayer Preaching Predestination Pride Prosperity Gospel Rachel Held Evans Racism Ravi Zacharias Redemption Reformation 500 Reformation Day Reformed Theology Relationship Repentance Salvation Same Sex Marriage Satan Satire Scripture Seminary Sex Sin slavery Sola Scriptura Soteriology Sovereignty Spiritual Gifts Spurgeon Star Wars Steven Furtick Suffering Sufficiency of Scripture Sunday School Supreme Court Technology Testimony The Church The Lord of the Rings The Problem of Evil The Shack Theology Theonomy Tithing Transgenderism Tullian Tchividjian Uncategorized Universalism Vanity Fair Video Games Virgin Birth Voting Wife Women Worldview Worship

Select a Month June 2025 April 2025 March 2025 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 June 2023 April 2023 March 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz