Patheos

BuddhistCatholicContemplativeEvangelicalGeneral ChristianHinduJewishLatter-day SaintMuslimNew VisionsProgressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Patheos

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

chorusinthechaos

Reformation 500: Sola Fide and The Roman Catholic Church

Last updated on: October 5, 2017 at 9:03 am   by Taylor Drummond

Reformation 500: Sola Fide and The Roman Catholic Church 2017-10-05T09:03:04-05:00 Taylor Drummond

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Reformation 500As the 500th anniversary of the Reformation marches nearer, it behooves us to examine anew the differences between the Roman Catholic and Protestant doctrine. What differences were so important that both sides felt that they could not compromise on them? What were (and are) the core disagreements between the Roman Catholic and Protestant churches? The doctrine of Justification is one that forms the core disagreement between the Roman Catholics and Protestants.[1] This doctrine is of vital importance for the Christian because it is at the heart of how a sinner is made right before God. The discussion of justification focuses largely on the writings of Paul in the New Testament and the purpose of these articles is to lay out both the Roman Catholic and the Historic Protestant views of justification and then compare them to what Paul has to say on the matter. Much ink has been sacrificed on the altar of justification by faith and we do not presume by any means to solve the dispute – ours is not the first nor the last word to be said on the subject. However, that does not mean that it is not worth discussing; it is clear that Paul supports one side rather than the other. In our discussions of the Roman Catholic view, we will use primarily the documents produced at the Council of Trent and the Catechism of the Catholic Church.

The Roman Catholic View

The Catholic Church believes that God grants justification in baptism. The Catechism of the Catholic Church says, “The Most Holy Trinity gives the baptized sanctifying grace, the grace of justification.”[2] It also says, “Justification is conferred in Baptism, the sacrament of faith.”[3] The Council of Trent says, “the Justification of the impious…cannot be effected, without the laver of regeneration”[4] and that, “the instrumental cause [of justification] is baptism.”[5] Clearly, in the Roman Catholic understanding the grace of justification is first given in baptism. The Catholic Church believed so strongly that baptism was necessary for justification that it said,

If any one saith, that the sacraments of the New Law are not necessary unto salvation, but superfluous; and that, without them, or without the desire thereof, men obtain of God, through faith alone, the grace of justification; – though all (the sacraments) are not indeed necessary for every individual; let him be anathema.[6]

This justification, given at baptism, is more than a simple declaration; it contains in it sanctification, which can already be seen by the equating of “sanctifying grace” and “the grace of justification” above. Paragraph 1266 of the Catholic Catechism goes on to say that the effects of the grace of justification given in baptism are,

Enabling them to believe in God, to hope in him, and to love him through the theological virtues; giving them the power to live and act under the prompting of the Holy Spirit through the gifts of the Holy Spirit; allowing them to grow in goodness through the moral virtues.[7]

Not only is justification the forgiveness of sins, but it is “also the sanctification and renewal of the interior man.”[8] The grace given in baptism is “infused by the Holy Spirit into the soul to heal it of sin and to sanctify it.”[9] It “detaches man from sin…and purifies his heart…it frees from the enslavement to sin, and it heals.”[10] In justification, the gifts faith, hope, and charity are poured or infused into our hearts along with the ability to obey God’s will.[11] This explains the language used in the Council of Trent and the Catechism that justification “conforms us to the righteousness of God”[12] and “maketh us just.”[13] The words of paragraph 1995 of the Catechism sum it up nicely, “justification entails the sanctification of his whole being.”[14]

Before we go any further, it should be noted that the Roman Catholic Church affirms justification by faith. Chapter VIII of the Council of Trent is worth quoting at length on this,

In what manner it is to be understood, that the impious is justified by faith, and gratuitously. And whereas the Apostle saith, that man is justified by faith and freely, those words are to be understood in that sense which the perpetual consent of the Catholic Church hath held and expressed; to wit, that we are therefore said to be justified by faith, because faith is the beginning of human salvation, the foundation, and the root of all Justification; without which it is impossible to please God, and to come unto the fellowship of His sons: but we are therefore said to be justified freely, because that none of those things which precede justification – whether faith or works – merit the grace itself of justification. For, if it be a grace, it is not now by works, otherwise, as the same Apostle says, grace is no more grace.[15]

Whatever disagreement Protestants may have with certain points in the preceding paragraph, it should not be denied that the Catholic Church views faith to be, at the very least, necessary for justification. In addition to affirming the necessity of faith, the Catechism goes slightly further and affirms, “no one can merit the initial grace of forgiveness, at the beginning of conversion.”[16] Justification is initially given by the grace of God and is not merited by the works of the one justified.

However, while it is plain that the Roman Catholic Church teaches that faith is necessary for justification and no one can merit initial justification, it also teaches that those who have been justified can, by their own good works, increase in justification and merit for themselves further graces. The Council of Trent says that we can, “through the observance of the commandments of God and of the church, faith co-operating with good works, increase in that justice which they have received through the grace of Christ, and are still further justified.”[17] Paragraph 2010 of the Catechism says, “Moved by the Holy Spirit and by charity, we can then merit for ourselves and for others the graces needed for our sanctification, for the increase of grace and charity, and for the attainment of eternal life.”[18] The Roman Catholic Church understands justification to be dynamic instead of static, in that it can increase and, as we shall see, decrease.

Having introduced the subject of merit, it is fitting to discuss how it relates to the Roman Catholic scheme of justification. The Catechism defines merit as “the recompense owed by a community or a society for the action of one of its members, experienced either as beneficial or harmful, deserving reward or punishment.”[19] No one can gain merit before God because everything that man has he has received from God; therefore, God owes him nothing.[20] The Christian can only be said to merit anything before God because “God has freely chosen to associate man with the work of his grace.”[21] Because one must rely on the grace of God both to do good works and to associate him with the merit of good works – the Catholic Church can say of those Christians who do good works, “their merits were pure grace.”[22] The Council of Trent says that Christ “infuses” his virtue into the justified and that the justice of God is “infused into us through the merit of Christ”. In this way, “we are justified from its [justice] being inherent in us” and there is nothing to prevent the justified from being accounted to have, “by those very works which have been done in God, fully satisfied the divine law according to the state of life, have truly merited eternal life.”[23] Therefore, for the Catholic Church, merit truly plays an important role in justification and is essential to the increase of the grace of justification.

Because the Roman Catholic Church views justification as an ongoing process that involves cooperation between human and divine will, it holds that those who have once been justified can lose their salvation by committing “mortal sins.” The Council of Trent says, “the received grace of justification is lost, not only by infidelity whereby even faith itself is lost, but also by any other mortal sin whatever, though faith be not lost.”[24] This vividly illustrates the role of faith and works in the Catholic scheme of justification; one may have faith but still not be justified because of a mortal sin. The grace lost by a mortal sin can be regained through the sacrament of Penance. The Council of Trent says, “those who, by sin, have fallen from the received grace of Justification, they may be again justified, when, God exciting them, through the sacrament of Penance they have attained to the recovery, by the merit of Christ, of the grace lost.”[25] This shows that for the Catholic Church, although faith is necessary for justification, it is not sufficient. One must also live a life of virtue that avoids mortal sins or do penance after committing a mortal sin in order to regain the grace of justification.

In summary, the Catholic view is that the grace of justification is conferred in baptism, entails the sanctification of the entire man, depends on faith, can be increased by the merit good works, can be lost by committing mortal sins, and can be regained by the sacrament of penance. In both the Roman Catholic and Historic Protestant views of justification faith is necessary – yet their views differ greatly on the sufficiency of faith. It is impossible to ignore the words of Canon IX,

If any one saith, that by faith alone the impious is justified; in such wise as to mean, that nothing else is required to co-operate in order to the obtaining the grace of Justification, and that it is not in any way necessary, that he be prepared and disposed by the movement of his own will; let him be anathema.[26]

 

Other Articles In This Series:

 


 

[1] Allison, Gregg R. Roman Catholic Theology and Practice: An Evangelical Assessment. Wheaton: Crossway, 2014. Pg. 431.
[2] “Catechism of the Catholic Church.” Vatican.va. 1993. http://www.vatican.va/archive/ENG0015/_INDEX.HTM (accessed October 12, 2015). Part 3, Section 1, Chapter 3, Article 2: 1266
[3] Catechism of the Catholic Church, op. cit., 1992
[4] Waterworth, J., ed. “Council of Trent” History.Hanover.Edu. 1995. http://history.hanover.edu/texts/trent.html (accessed October 12, 2015). Sixth Session, Decree on Justification, Chapter IV
[5] Council of Trent, op. cit., Chapter VII
[6] Council of Trent: Seventh Session, Cannon IV
[7] Catechism of the Catholic Church, Part 3, Section 1, Chapter 3, Article 2, 1266
[8] Catechism of the Catholic Church, op. cit., 1989
[9] Catechism of the Catholic Church, op. cit., 1999
[10] Catechism of the Catholic Church, op. cit., 1990
[11] Catechism of the Cathlic Church op. cit., 1991; cf. Council of Trent: Sixth Session, Decree on Justification, Chapter VII
[12] Catechism of the Cathlic Church, Part 3, Section 1, Chapter 3, Article 2, 1992 cf. 2020
[13] Council of Trent, Sixth Session, Decree on Justification, Chapter VII, cf. Chapter III
[14] Catechism of the Cathlic Church, Part 3, Section 1, Chapter 3, Article 2, 1991
[15] Council of Trent, Sixth Session, Chapter VIII, emphasis added
[16] Catechism of the Cathlic Church, Part 3, Section 1, Chapter 3, Article 2, 2010
[17] Council of Trent, Sixth Session, Decree on Justification, Chapter X
[18] Catechism of the Catholic Church, Part 3, Section 1, Chapter 3, Article 2, 2010
[19] Catechism of the Catholic Church, op. cit., 2006
[20] Catechism of the Catholic Church, op. cit., 2007
[21] Catechism of the Catholic Church, op. cit., 2008
[22] Catechism of the Catholic Church, Part 3, Section 1, Chapter 3, Article 2, 2011
[23] Council of Trent: Sixth Session, Decree on Justification, Chapter XVI (emphasis added)
[24] Council of Trent, op. cit., Chapter XV
[25] Council of Trent, op. cit., Chapter XIV
[26] Council of Trent: Sixth Session, Decree on Justification, Canon IX (emphasis added)

Reformation 500

Reformation 500

Roman Catholicism

Sola Fide

Previous Post



August 8, 2017

Mr. DeYoung - Here's Why Christians Watch Game of Thrones

Next Post



August 16, 2017 9 Great Hymns Every Christian Should Know


Browse Our Archives

Select a Category #ShoutYourAbortion 10 Commandments 2016 Election 2017 2020 Election Abortion Accelerate Books Adultery America Andy Stanley Arminianism Ashley Madison Atonement B&H Academic Baptism Barry Horner Beauty Biblical Elders Billy Graham Blog Book Review Bruce Jenner Caitlyn Jenner Calvin Calvinism Cheating Chick-fil-A Children Christ Christian History Christian Living Christian Podcasts Christianity Christmas Church History Church Leadership Civil Disobedience Constitutional Coronavirus Culture Death Demoninations Discipleship Doctrine Doctrine of God Donald Trump Ecclesiology Entertainment Eschatology Ethics Evangelical Evangelism Evil Evolution Fear Forgive Yourself Forgiveness Francis Chan Future Israel Gay Marriage Gender Genesis George Floyd Gospel Government Gun Control Halloween hamartiology Heavenly Reward Hermeneutics History Hollywood Holy Spirit Homeschool Homosexual Homosexuality Hope Hospitality Humor Husband Infant Baptism Interview Jesus John Piper Josh Duggar Joshua Harris Judgment Justice Kathy Griffin Kim Davis Leadership Logic Love Manhood Marriage Martin Luther Messianic Prophecy Miscarriage Mocking Modesty Money Movie Reviews Music Music Review Netflix New Testament Obergefell Old Testament Parenting Pastor Pastoring Persecution Planned Parenthood Podcast Politics Pop Culture Pornography Prayer Preaching Predestination Pride Prosperity Gospel Rachel Held Evans Racism Ravi Zacharias Redemption Reformation 500 Reformation Day Reformed Theology Relationship Repentance Salvation Same Sex Marriage Satan Satire Scripture Seminary Sex Sin slavery Sola Scriptura Soteriology Sovereignty Spiritual Gifts Spurgeon Star Wars Steven Furtick Suffering Sufficiency of Scripture Sunday School Supreme Court Technology Testimony The Church The Lord of the Rings The Problem of Evil The Shack Theology Theonomy Tithing Transgenderism Tullian Tchividjian Uncategorized Universalism Vanity Fair Video Games Virgin Birth Voting Wife Women Worldview Worship

Select a Month June 2025 April 2025 March 2025 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 June 2023 April 2023 March 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014


Follow Us!

Follow Us on Facebook Follow Us on Twitter



TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What was the consequence of David’s sin with Bathsheba?

Select your answer to see how you score.

His kingdom was taken away Bathsheba was taken from him David was exiled Their first child died

Related posts from The Chorus In The Chaos

Evangelical

Reformation 500: Not a Celebration of the Reformers,...

The Chorus In The Chaos

Evangelical

Should the Reformation be Celebrated or Lamented?

The Chorus In The Chaos

Evangelical

Reformation 500: Is Sola Scriptura a Blueprint for...

The Chorus In The Chaos

Evangelical

Reformation 500: Sola Gratia to a World Who...

The Chorus In The Chaos

TRENDING AT PATHEOS Evangelical

The REST of Your Life: A Creative Wrestles...

This week I had a conversation with a good friend from church....

How the author of the world's best hymn...

I've been working with John Newton for a while now. This makes...

Psalm 130 | Lectio Divina

Long before this Lectio Divina, Psalm 130 - the song - started...

What About the Trees? Another Living Parable

After I finished writing the last article about falling leaves as a...

Why Classical Education Is a Conversation, Not a...

Come and Read: Joy in Classical Education When I was a little...

What Happened at Cornell?

Cornell University has received a great deal of negative publicity and intense...

view all Evangelical blogs

Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Copyright 2008-2026, Patheos. All rights reserved.

Subscription Support Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube