“Midnight In Paris” Movie Review (Nostalgia and Woody Allen)

Last updated on: April 11, 2016 at 2:41 pm by Jonathan Dorst

“Midnight In Paris” Movie Review (Nostalgia and Woody Allen) 2016-04-11T14:41:25-05:00 Jonathan Dorst

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

midnightinparis Woody Allen has been making movies for almost 50 years, and will be 80 years old this year. He is the classic ‘auteur,’ a creative artist who is responsible for a film’s content, as he writes and directs (and often stars in) all of his movies. It is standard critical opinion that, even though he pumps out a picture a year, he goes long stretches without making a really great movie. He seems ok with this fact, hoping that quantity will make up for lapses in quality. I wonder, though, if he hasn’t given up (at least a little) hoping to please audiences today. A film he made in 2011, Midnight in Paris, is all about the struggle between living in the past and living in the disappointing present. As always, with Allen, you wonder how much is autobiographical.

In the film, Owen Wilson plays ‘the Woody character’ as a young writer named Gil who is on vacation in Paris with his fiancé and her family. Gil loves Paris and wants to experience art at a deep level, but his fiancé loves shopping and only wants to know art at a surface level. A bit of unexplained magic leads Gil to temporarily leave the present at midnight every night and go back in time to 1920’s Paris. There Gil meets some of his heroes, such as Scott Fitzgerald, Ernest Hemingway, Pablo Picasso, Salvador Dali, and Gertrude Stein. He also meets an attractive young woman named Adriana, played by Marion Cotillard, who herself is obsessed with the Belle Epoque, the 1890’s. The result is an enjoyable, if fairly predictable (with some one-dimensional stereotypes), romantic comedy.

But I don’t want to dismiss the movie as ‘just another rom-com.’ It is more than that. It wants to ask big questions, and I found it made two key observations.

The first is that there is no golden age. There’s just life; good and bad and ugly fills every era, and if one era seems better than others it’s probably a result of perspective (particularly from the perspective of the history writers). There is a prevailing notion, especially among conservatives (with many liberals coming to the opposite conclusion), that early America and the America of our grandparents was better than ours. But a more sober assessment shows that some things were better, but some things were much worse. Racism, while still alive today, was much worse in the 30’s and 40’s. Child abuse wasn’t reported back then, but it happened, and recent legislation makes it harder to get away with child abuse today. Mentally ill people had little, if any, medical options and were often locked away and forgotten in the ‘old days’; today many are treated and can live normal lives. When I was a kid, bullies were rampant at school; at my kid’s school, there is a zero tolerance policy for bullies. Certainly there are some dangers today’s children have to face (drugs, porn) that didn’t affect past generations; but there are also safeguards and learning opportunities for children today that were not available to kids in ‘the greatest generation.’

The second observation the film makes is that the art and artists of the past have a lot to tell us if we will really listen. This goes far beyond nostalgia. Nostalgia likes a feeling, but not necessarily the substance. This is why we have muzak- the elevator music that plays the hits of ‘yesteryear’ to make people feel pleasant. Of course, when musicians ride those elevators they recognize all of the songs and immediately hate the arrangements. So, I ask myself, do I like writers like St. Augustine and Athanasius because I’ve romanticized their writings and influence, or do I like Augustine and Athanasius because they really have taught me a lot (and I’ve really taken the time to listen)? Do I like jazz because it really feeds my soul, or because it’s cool (for some, very uncool to others, I realize)?

We need to ask ourselves why we’re always pulled to the ‘New’ section of the video store. Why not the classics? While there are probably many reasons for ‘the tyranny of the new,’ Midnight in Paris reminds us that the past has more treasures waiting for us to discover. Don’t believe me? Check out Crimes and Misdemeanors or Hannah and Her Sisters.

Movie Reviews

Midnight In Paris

Woody Allen

Previous Post

November 5, 2014

Submission To Ceasar

Next Post

November 10, 2014 Keeping INgratitude OUT

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category #ShoutYourAbortion 10 Commandments 2016 Election 2017 2020 Election Abortion Accelerate Books Adultery America Andy Stanley Arminianism Ashley Madison Atonement B&H Academic Baptism Barry Horner Beauty Biblical Elders Billy Graham Blog Book Review Bruce Jenner Caitlyn Jenner Calvin Calvinism Cheating Chick-fil-A Children Christ Christian History Christian Living Christian Podcasts Christianity Christmas Church History Church Leadership Civil Disobedience Constitutional Coronavirus Culture Death Demoninations Discipleship Doctrine Doctrine of God Donald Trump Ecclesiology Entertainment Eschatology Ethics Evangelical Evangelism Evil Evolution Fear Forgive Yourself Forgiveness Francis Chan Future Israel Gay Marriage Gender Genesis George Floyd Gospel Government Gun Control Halloween hamartiology Heavenly Reward Hermeneutics History Hollywood Holy Spirit Homeschool Homosexual Homosexuality Hope Hospitality Humor Husband Infant Baptism Interview Jesus John Piper Josh Duggar Joshua Harris Judgment Justice Kathy Griffin Kim Davis Leadership Logic Love Manhood Marriage Martin Luther Messianic Prophecy Miscarriage Mocking Modesty Money Movie Reviews Music Music Review Netflix New Testament Obergefell Old Testament Parenting Pastor Pastoring Persecution Planned Parenthood Podcast Politics Pop Culture Pornography Prayer Preaching Predestination Pride Prosperity Gospel Rachel Held Evans Racism Ravi Zacharias Redemption Reformation 500 Reformation Day Reformed Theology Relationship Repentance Salvation Same Sex Marriage Satan Satire Scripture Seminary Sex Sin slavery Sola Scriptura Soteriology Sovereignty Spiritual Gifts Spurgeon Star Wars Steven Furtick Suffering Sufficiency of Scripture Sunday School Supreme Court Technology Testimony The Church The Lord of the Rings The Problem of Evil The Shack Theology Theonomy Tithing Transgenderism Tullian Tchividjian Uncategorized Universalism Vanity Fair Video Games Virgin Birth Voting Wife Women Worldview Worship

Select a Month June 2025 April 2025 March 2025 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 June 2023 April 2023 March 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz