Literally No One Argues the Church is a Physical Building

Last updated on: March 30, 2022 at 2:32 pm by Grayson Gilbert

Literally No One Argues the Church is a Physical Building 2022-03-30T14:32:12-05:00 Grayson Gilbert

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Over the years, we have published several posts dealing with the importance of the local church. They’ve generated their fair share of controversy, despite the fact that what I and others have argued is nothing groundbreaking within the Christian faith. When we boil things down in the modern era of church and church attendance, there is a remarkably noticeable difference in our practices and that of the church for millennia. Rather than simply meet once a week to hear the Word of God, the saints of old darkened the doors of the church multiple times a week.

It was plainly understood, in other words, that participation in the local church was the lifeblood of the Christian. As such, it remained a non-negotiable in the minds of those who took their faith seriously. For many today though, the local church is seen as something you should not only flee from, but actively speak against. The reasons for this are many, but at the heart of anti-church sentiments today is the heavy emphasis on self-reliance. Even in how many a person approaches evangelism—it is all about personal reconciliation to God rather than what the Scriptures teach.

In reality, we are both individually reconciled to God, and corporately reconciled to one another under the common banner of the faith. Many pay lip service to this reality by acknowledging the universal church, that is, all those spanning space and time that have been saved in Christ, yet they subsequently deny the need to be part of a local church. In essence, they divorce themselves from being attached to any particular geographical church body in favor of believing they share in some sort of mystical bond with the global church. While there is certainly a bond between all believers that transcends all earthly limitations, you find no Biblical evidence that such a bond supersedes the call to not forsake the actual assembly of believers (Heb. 10:24-25).

What you find instead are several aspects that are impossible to fulfill outside of the local church. You cannot be in submission to elders if you refuse to be part of a biblical church. You cannot partake in the various “one-anothers” the Scriptures call us to if you forsake the assembling of the brethren. Likewise, you cannot experience the unique blessings of God as He presides through the preaching of the Word, the taking of the ordinances, the public reading of Scripture, public prayer, praise, and more—all of which we are corporately called to obey in the Christian community called “the church.” We cannot “build one another up in our most holy faith” by ourselves, nor even in a group of like-minded Christians who do not make up a biblically constituted church.

Common objections rise every time these kinds of arguments are made:

If you advocate for regular attendance, even making room for providential hindrance and works of necessity—you’re a legalist or Pharisee.
If you say even those wounded in the past should still not forsake the assembly, you’re unloving, judgmental, and lacking empathy.
If you claim the existence of bad churches and hypocrites doesn’t revoke the call upon Christians to gather, you’re delusional.
If you tell parents they are crippling their kids if they make church optional, you’re a manipulative fear-monger.
If you’re bold enough to say that if you claim to love Jesus, yet hate His church, you cannot be a Christian—oddly enough, you’re considered anathema.

According to these same people, you can thrive outside of the community of the faith and embrace that rugged American individualism that is part and parcel to the fabric of your identity. You need not be part of a local church, in submission to elders who know you personally, because you and perhaps a few like-minded folks are all you need to flourish and hold you accountable. You don’t need faithful expositors who can pastorally apply the Scriptures, as there are many “better” preachers available to you through venues such as YouTube. In other words, you can have your proverbial, spiritual cake and eat it too.

One of the common proof-texts to support this notion is the oft-quoted, “Where two or more are gathered” (Matt. 18:20). The problem with using this particular verse is that it is being subjected to blatant misuse due to lifting it from its fuller context (Matt. 18:15-20). As I’ve argued in the past, the verse is not making a statement about the nature of the church, but rather, one of the functions. More clearly: Christ is not speaking towards the structure or make up of a church, in that when you happen to have two or more Christians in any space together, they make up a bonafide church.

Rather, the context speaks directly toward the practice of church discipline. This is vitally important to this discussion simply because it unravels the use of Matt. 18:20 towards this popular, but exegetically unfounded end. In other words, you can’t use this verse to argue this is what constitutes a biblically defined church because that isn’t what the text means. Two or three people don’t make a church, no more than an arm, a leg, and a spleen somehow constitute an entire body. Yet one of the more subtle arguments that is often made with this text (and others) in mind is that the church isn’t a building.

Anyone with half a brain would naturally assent to this on the surface, as it is quite clear from even a general reading of Scripture that the church is not seen as the literal brick and mortar building that we might occupy on a Sunday morning for service. Yet what often gets relegated to the sidelines is that this group of people that Scripture calls “the church” in fact does meet in time and space. In more clear speech: part of what makes a church a “church” is that they actually do meet in some location at a given time.

The universal, or global church, becomes manifest in local churches. This should be a fairly self-evident truth when we consider that every single epistle to the church was written to an actual church, or group of churches, that met in a particular geographical location. The letter to the Romans was written to the church at Rome. The letter to the Philippians was written to those saints in Philippi, and so on and so forth. These letters then were broadly circulated amongst the churches of other particular geographical locations. This is just common knowledge.

Yet more to the point: the global church is an inseparable reality from the local church, which simply means the global church is actually made up of flesh and blood people that do, in fact, meet together. Whether that “meeting together” so happens to be in a building, underground, in a home, or elsewhere the bare essentials of what makes a church a “church” must still be present. There are certain irreducible qualities, in other words, that inform what a church is and does.

As Gregg Allison puts it in his excellent work on Ecclesiology, these bare essentials that characterize a true church are that they are, “…doxological, logocentric, pneumadynamic, covenantal, confessional, missional, and spatio-temporal/eschatological. Local churches are led by pastors (also called elders) and served by deacons, possess and pursue purity and unity, exercise church discipline, develop strong connections with other churches, and celebrate the ordinances of baptism and the Lord’s Supper. Equipped by the Holy Spirit with spiritual gifts for ministry, these communities regularly gather to worship the triune God, proclaim His Word, engage non-Christians with the gospel, disciple their members, care for people through prayer and giving, and stand both for and against the world.”

While such qualities that make up a genuine church may give way to exceptions to the rule (e.g., the church is in the process of raising up deacons, finding a replacement for their recently deceased pastor, or they simply lack biblically qualified men in order to become a plurality of elders, etc.), they are, by no means, the rule itself. If these qualities are entirely lacking though, it must be stated: while it may be a gathering that perhaps some Christians are part of, it is not a church. You can’t have a “church,” in other words, that fails to live up to the biblical criteria of what the church actually is—part of which is that they are spatio-temporal, meaning they actually meet in time and space.

It is important to note that no one is pretending as if the broader church is bereft of any problems. We all know of plenty churches that are no churches at all, at least when we consider the biblical criteria for what a church is to be. I believe it to be paramount to our walk with Christ though that we be part of a local church body where the gospel is present. I will take a church that is faithful to the gospel, yet differs on important matters of doctrine, over cloistering off to myself any day of the week. The reason for this is relatively simple: as wonderful as we all may believe ourselves to be, we’re not. If Christ can bear patiently with you, you can bear patiently with others who are legitimately within the household of the faith.

The reality is that we were not saved unto ourselves, we were saved unto a body, and a particular local body at that. God has not made it so that we will flourish outside of the community of the faith. More than this, He has graciously given us parameters in His Word that shows precisely what this community of the faith is to look like and how that informs their practice. While it is a general truism that the church isn’t the building, the church, more often than not, actually occupies a building. In the end, no one argues that the church is the physical building when they refer to “the church.” They do, however, refer to that body of sinners that Christ has saved and fitted together, which Scripture requires we meet with.

So, meet with them. In the end, if you still refuse to go to church, at least stop using bad arguments that literally no one believes.

Previous Post

March 17, 2022

When Conservatives Fail to Conserve

Next Post

April 7, 2022 Sorry Tim Keller, People Reject Christ Because They Reject the Bible

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category #ShoutYourAbortion 10 Commandments 2016 Election 2017 2020 Election Abortion Accelerate Books Adultery America Andy Stanley Arminianism Ashley Madison Atonement B&H Academic Baptism Barry Horner Beauty Biblical Elders Billy Graham Blog Book Review Bruce Jenner Caitlyn Jenner Calvin Calvinism Cheating Chick-fil-A Children Christ Christian History Christian Living Christian Podcasts Christianity Christmas Church History Church Leadership Civil Disobedience Constitutional Coronavirus Culture Death Demoninations Discipleship Doctrine Doctrine of God Donald Trump Ecclesiology Entertainment Eschatology Ethics Evangelical Evangelism Evil Evolution Fear Forgive Yourself Forgiveness Francis Chan Future Israel Gay Marriage Gender Genesis George Floyd Gospel Government Gun Control Halloween hamartiology Heavenly Reward Hermeneutics History Hollywood Holy Spirit Homeschool Homosexual Homosexuality Hope Hospitality Humor Husband Infant Baptism Interview Jesus John Piper Josh Duggar Joshua Harris Judgment Justice Kathy Griffin Kim Davis Leadership Logic Love Manhood Marriage Martin Luther Messianic Prophecy Miscarriage Mocking Modesty Money Movie Reviews Music Music Review Netflix New Testament Obergefell Old Testament Parenting Pastor Pastoring Persecution Planned Parenthood Podcast Politics Pop Culture Pornography Prayer Preaching Predestination Pride Prosperity Gospel Rachel Held Evans Racism Ravi Zacharias Redemption Reformation 500 Reformation Day Reformed Theology Relationship Repentance Salvation Same Sex Marriage Satan Satire Scripture Seminary Sex Sin slavery Sola Scriptura Soteriology Sovereignty Spiritual Gifts Spurgeon Star Wars Steven Furtick Suffering Sufficiency of Scripture Sunday School Supreme Court Technology Testimony The Church The Lord of the Rings The Problem of Evil The Shack Theology Theonomy Tithing Transgenderism Tullian Tchividjian Uncategorized Universalism Vanity Fair Video Games Virgin Birth Voting Wife Women Worldview Worship

Select a Month June 2025 April 2025 March 2025 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 June 2023 April 2023 March 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz