Jesus Was Rejected for Teaching Predestination

Last updated on: March 2, 2018 at 4:31 pm by Grayson Gilbert

Jesus Was Rejected for Teaching Predestination 2018-03-02T16:31:40-05:00 Grayson Gilbert

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

John 6:22-71 is truly a fascinating passage in many ways, as it deals directly with Christ’s claims to divinity amidst a crowd who simply didn’t see Him for who He was. It is no small coincidence John includes the narrative of Christ performing such magnificent miracles in the preceding verses. These miracles not only demonstrate His mastery over the elements, but serve a larger point to show His mastery over all Creation. Within this same measure, Jesus uses these miracles to demonstrate the greater miracle given to mankind is Himself. Yet what often gets shoved to the side in this passage by non-Calvinists is the Scripture’s clear teaching on predestination.

While the overarching point of this passage highlights the divinity of Christ, it is readily apparent several underlying, Calvinistic themes emerge in the text. In fact, it can be argued that Unconditional Election, Limited Atonement, and Irresistible Grace are all present themes in this passage. Rather than focus on trying to make these theological points fit in the text, I am simply going to draw out particular instances where predestination is present. It should be obvious that the full teachings of these doctrines are not present, but it is important that we catch glimpses of them here. What becomes clear as we examine this in the passage is that these teachings were a large part of the reason why many “turned back and no longer walked with Him” (vv. 59, 66). As in our own day, the topic of predestination was not well-received.

The Clarity of Predestination in this Passage

When we take a step back and look at Christ drawing the parallel to God providing Manna from the heavens in Exodus 16 and Himself, an interesting observation can be made. In Exodus 16:4, the Lord speaks of testing His people through the provision of Manna. For what purpose? To see if they will walk in His instruction. Yet of particular interest is their continued grumbling against the Lord’s provision throughout the whole of the passage in Exodus. For anyone familiar with the text itself, we know it obviously doesn’t end well for the grumbling Israelites.

Back to our text in John 6, we see Jesus pick up this same theme from Exodus 16 to draw out that He is the greater “bread from heaven” that gives life to the world. What is unique in this is that without even touching on predestination to begin with, Christ immediately brings focus to God’s providence through His Son. Not only will those who come to Him never hunger, but they will also never thirst; it is an eternal sustenance found solely in the person of Christ.

Yet this sustenance has a particular people in mind, as He moves on to say that the ones who will come to Him are those whom the Father has sent (v. 37-38). Everyone, meaning every literal individual given by the Father, will come to Christ – and Christ shall never drive them away. Why? Christ came down from heaven as the Bread of Life to do the will of the Father (v. 38). If this were not clear enough, the very next verse defines what the will of the Father is: that I shall lose none of those He has given Me, but raise them up at the last day (v. 39). Again, if this were still not clear enough, in verse 40 Christ reiterates this teaching by declaring that any who look upon the Son and believe in Him shall have eternal life and be raised on the last day.

I bring this out with the particular focus of John 6:41 and following, as the theme of grumbling arises once again. Their response is verbatim to how their ancestors responded to Moses; God provides life-giving sustenance, this time in a measure which cannot be surpassed, and they grumble. Christ initially responds, “Stop grumbling among yourselves. No one can come to Me unless the Father who sent Me draws him, and I will raise him up at the last day.” Rather than shying away, He doubles down on all that He just said and even becomes more controversial in teaching they must eat of His flesh and drink of His blood.

What is astounding here is that all throughout His presentation of this truth, Christ never shies away from demonstrating that He is God, the Father draws those whom will be saved and raised on that last day, and that rather than rejoicing, the Israelites grumbled. John draws attention to their grumbling three times in this passage (vv. 41, 43, and 60), as well as the result it produced (vv. 59, 66). Of particular interest here was Christ’s keen observation all the way back in verse 36, where He states, “…you have seen Me and still you do not believe.”

What this plainly indicates is that they were not those whom the Father drew to Christ for salvation through Him. They did not see God – because they were not His children. They were not those whom the Father had drawn to Christ, for if they were, they would have come to Him (v. 37, 44). In opposition to this we find the words of Peter when Christ asks if he wanted to leave Him too: “Lord, to whom would we go? You have the words of eternal life. We believe and know that You are the Holy One of God.”

The disparity of these two reactions serves to demonstrate effectual belief in the Son of God is conditional to the work of God. However, it also clearly indicates the content of this teaching is at the heart of their rejection of Christ. It is not simply a matter of perceived cannibalism, which no doubt would have struck many Jews with a sense of disgust due to Mosaic Law. It is the matter of God providing the means of eternal sustenance in the person of Christ, and God drawing whom He wills to this same Christ, which they grumbled over.

Predestination Highlights God’s Mastery Over All Creation – Even You

With all of this in mind, I wish to bring out the beginning of this chapter once again, particularly, in reflection of this narrative’s placement among two other miracles. I believe John is highlighting a third, greater miracle, being the effectual drawing and sustaining of God’s elect. The purpose of miracles within the New Testament serve to demonstrate Christ’s superiority over all of created order, and in this instance, this includes the heart of man.

Just as John pens Christ’s miraculous ability to heal the lame, replicate a meager meal to a feast for thousands, His ability rebuke the winds and calm the sea, and Christ’s ability to walk on water – the apostle highlights He is greater than all these things. However, we cannot divorce this from the teaching of predestination all throughout the teaching of Christ’s divinity in this chapter. It is intermingled throughout the passage in such a way that John truly wishes for us to see the fullness of His might over creation.

It must be stated that to see such miracles, it would be readily obvious to all that this was the Son of man. In fact, we have numerous examples where men exclaim this very thing upon seeing His demonstration of that mastery over creation. However, in the midst of this, there are thousands who witnessed such things and still rejected the person of Christ. How else might one make sense of this if it were not for the fact that these men were not those whom the Father predestined and gave to the Son, especially when the text so clearly shows this?

Yet a greater teaching comes from this in that no created thing can thwart the purposes of God. Often, men will ascent to this truth, yet scarcely will they lump in their autonomy as part of what God has jurisdiction over. Christ, in the full measure of His deity, performs the miraculous as only the Son of God can. Even the hardened heart is turned from stone to flesh; is this not an act of God bending the will, as only the Potter could? Shall we say He is unjust? By no means! The Potter has right to do what He wills with His creation, which according to this passage, is to draw those whom He sent to Christ, so that Christ will not lose even one.

Previous Post

February 23, 2018

Progressives Celebrating Billy Graham's Death Should Wake You Up

Next Post

March 10, 2018 Preemptive Attack: A Reflection For Lent

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category #ShoutYourAbortion 10 Commandments 2016 Election 2017 2020 Election Abortion Accelerate Books Adultery America Andy Stanley Arminianism Ashley Madison Atonement B&H Academic Baptism Barry Horner Beauty Biblical Elders Billy Graham Blog Book Review Bruce Jenner Caitlyn Jenner Calvin Calvinism Cheating Chick-fil-A Children Christ Christian History Christian Living Christian Podcasts Christianity Christmas Church History Church Leadership Civil Disobedience Constitutional Coronavirus Culture Death Demoninations Discipleship Doctrine Doctrine of God Donald Trump Ecclesiology Entertainment Eschatology Ethics Evangelical Evangelism Evil Evolution Fear Forgive Yourself Forgiveness Francis Chan Future Israel Gay Marriage Gender Genesis George Floyd Gospel Government Gun Control Halloween hamartiology Heavenly Reward Hermeneutics History Hollywood Holy Spirit Homeschool Homosexual Homosexuality Hope Hospitality Humor Husband Infant Baptism Interview Jesus John Piper Josh Duggar Joshua Harris Judgment Justice Kathy Griffin Kim Davis Leadership Logic Love Manhood Marriage Martin Luther Messianic Prophecy Miscarriage Mocking Modesty Money Movie Reviews Music Music Review Netflix New Testament Obergefell Old Testament Parenting Pastor Pastoring Persecution Planned Parenthood Podcast Politics Pop Culture Pornography Prayer Preaching Predestination Pride Prosperity Gospel Rachel Held Evans Racism Ravi Zacharias Redemption Reformation 500 Reformation Day Reformed Theology Relationship Repentance Salvation Same Sex Marriage Satan Satire Scripture Seminary Sex Sin slavery Sola Scriptura Soteriology Sovereignty Spiritual Gifts Spurgeon Star Wars Steven Furtick Suffering Sufficiency of Scripture Sunday School Supreme Court Technology Testimony The Church The Lord of the Rings The Problem of Evil The Shack Theology Theonomy Tithing Transgenderism Tullian Tchividjian Uncategorized Universalism Vanity Fair Video Games Virgin Birth Voting Wife Women Worldview Worship

Select a Month June 2025 April 2025 March 2025 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 June 2023 April 2023 March 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz