How Was Samson Righteous? A Review of Pure Flix’s Samson

Last updated on: February 20, 2018 at 7:20 am by Jonathan Dorst

How Was Samson Righteous? A Review of Pure Flix’s Samson 2018-02-20T07:20:33-05:00 Jonathan Dorst

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

There is a somewhat shocking detail in the so-called ‘Hall of Fame of Faith’ in Hebrews chapter 11. In the midst of extolling the virtuous saints of the Old Testament who lived ‘by faith,’ like Moses and Abraham, we read the name ‘Samson.’

Wait, Samson from the book of Judges (there isn’t any other Samson in the Bible)? The same Samson who was best known for running after whores and caring more about pleasure than being faithful to his family and to the Lord? How did Samson get in the Hall of Fame of Faith? How was he righteous?

In the new movie Samson, produced by Pure Flix, the same studio that made The Book of Esther, The Book of Ruth, The Book of Daniel, The Case for Christ, A Christmas Angel, and God’s Not Dead, Samson (Taylor James) is more heroic (and chaste) than sinful. The film begins with an invented scene, intended to introduce characterization, where Samson and his brother Caleb are stealing food from the Philistine oppressors who have been stealing it from the Israelites. The scene is telling as it depicts Samson as a guy who is a little like Disney’s Aladdin, a pluckish young man who bends the rules, but only because his enemies sort of force him in to it.

The movie picks up Samson’s story in Judges 14 when he falls in love with a Philistine woman (not given a name in Scripture, but named Taren in the movie) and marries her, despite the protests of his parents. Many of the details of Samson’s story are included in the film, and I was impressed by not only the good production values (sometimes lacking in Christians movies), but also how helpful it was in visualizing the situation in the time of the judges, particularly in the relationship between the Philistines and Israel.

The movie certainly takes artistic liberty, the biggest one being adding two Philistine rulers, a father (Billy Zane) and son (Jackson Rathbone), who are essential to the plot. Now, I understand artistic liberty and I even appreciate in many movies. I understand that there are times when you have to add some characters and dialogue in order to turn a story from literature, even from sacred Scripture, into a well-paced, three act movie. However, there was one detail of Samson (the movie) that I think changed the whole theme of the Samson story in the Bible. In the movie, Samson is shown praying at multiple times and wrestling with God’s will and silence throughout. However, in the biblical account, there is no sense that Samson cares about God at all, and he never utters a prayer or does anything intentionally righteous until the very end of his life, when he prays for God to remember him and give him strength to destroy the house of the Philistines (Judges 16:28-30).

The Reformation Study Bible has a wonderful synopsis of Samson’s story: “[O]f all the judges, Samson was most clearly a rogue. Having taken the vow to be a Nazirite, he kept only the part about not cutting his hair. He repeatedly broke God’s covenant and his vow by seeking foreign wives, sleeping with prostitutes, touching dead things, and drinking wine. He showed no interest in delivering Israel. The fanfare of his calling and the circumstances surrounding his birth and life only heighten the tragedy of his life and emphasize the depths to which Israel had descended.”

The film’s sympathetic characterization of Samson seems to come from a sincere desire to reconcile the Judges account with Samson’s place in Hebrews 11. However, it falls in to the old mistake of seeing Old Testament characters as simply moral examples, to either follow or learn from. As Tim Keller writes, “There is, in the end, only two ways to read the Bible: is it basically about me or basically about Jesus? In other words, is it basically about what I must do, or basically about what he has done? If I read David and Goliath as basically giving me an example, then the story is really about me. I must summon up the faith and courage to fight the giants in my life. But if I read David and Goliath as basically showing me salvation through Jesus [we are the overmatched Israelites, Goliath is Satan, and David is Christ], then the story is really about him.”

The shocking part of Samson’s story is not that God answered his prayer to give him strength to destroy Israel’s enemies, since we’re told early on in Samson’s stories, in Judges 14:4, that Samson’s dalliances with Philistine women was “from the Lord, for he was seeking an opportunity against the Philistines.” Rather, the shocking part of Samson’s story is that he is included in a chapter of people who lived by faith.

So, how was Samson righteous? How did he live ‘by faith’? His story is ultimately a story of someone saved by grace through faith alone by the radical, undeserved grace of God. Most of Samson’s life showed him to be the opposite of someone living by faith, but in the end, like the criminal on the cross, God justified him and gave him faith, thus destroying the enemies of God and bringing Israel closer to the glorious reign of their first king (David) and their ultimate king (Jesus). As the Reformation Study Bible comments, “Samson was not like Gideon or Samuel [other judges]. Though the Spirit came upon him repeatedly, this had no impact on his character… Yet the account of the end of his life reflects a renewal of his faith while a prisoner of his (and God’s) enemies. Heb. 11:32 lists Samson on the honor roll of faith.”

Samson’s story is the story of the marvelous grace of God to the most undeserving of sinners. There is no one who is righteous, in and of himself, only those made righteous by the regeneration of the Spirit imputing the righteousness of Christ. The new film Samson sort of gets this (and even seems to visually link Samson’s sufferings with Jesus’ sufferings), but ultimately it is too concerned with presently a sanitized version of a flawed but likable Samson to get at the radical nature of grace.

Previous Post

February 15, 2018

The Parkland Shooting Reveals the Baser Instincts of All Men

Next Post

February 20, 2018 An Open Letter to My Fellow Seminary Students

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category #ShoutYourAbortion 10 Commandments 2016 Election 2017 2020 Election Abortion Accelerate Books Adultery America Andy Stanley Arminianism Ashley Madison Atonement B&H Academic Baptism Barry Horner Beauty Biblical Elders Billy Graham Blog Book Review Bruce Jenner Caitlyn Jenner Calvin Calvinism Cheating Chick-fil-A Children Christ Christian History Christian Living Christian Podcasts Christianity Christmas Church History Church Leadership Civil Disobedience Constitutional Coronavirus Culture Death Demoninations Discipleship Doctrine Doctrine of God Donald Trump Ecclesiology Entertainment Eschatology Ethics Evangelical Evangelism Evil Evolution Fear Forgive Yourself Forgiveness Francis Chan Future Israel Gay Marriage Gender Genesis George Floyd Gospel Government Gun Control Halloween hamartiology Heavenly Reward Hermeneutics History Hollywood Holy Spirit Homeschool Homosexual Homosexuality Hope Hospitality Humor Husband Infant Baptism Interview Jesus John Piper Josh Duggar Joshua Harris Judgment Justice Kathy Griffin Kim Davis Leadership Logic Love Manhood Marriage Martin Luther Messianic Prophecy Miscarriage Mocking Modesty Money Movie Reviews Music Music Review Netflix New Testament Obergefell Old Testament Parenting Pastor Pastoring Persecution Planned Parenthood Podcast Politics Pop Culture Pornography Prayer Preaching Predestination Pride Prosperity Gospel Rachel Held Evans Racism Ravi Zacharias Redemption Reformation 500 Reformation Day Reformed Theology Relationship Repentance Salvation Same Sex Marriage Satan Satire Scripture Seminary Sex Sin slavery Sola Scriptura Soteriology Sovereignty Spiritual Gifts Spurgeon Star Wars Steven Furtick Suffering Sufficiency of Scripture Sunday School Supreme Court Technology Testimony The Church The Lord of the Rings The Problem of Evil The Shack Theology Theonomy Tithing Transgenderism Tullian Tchividjian Uncategorized Universalism Vanity Fair Video Games Virgin Birth Voting Wife Women Worldview Worship

Select a Month June 2025 April 2025 March 2025 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 June 2023 April 2023 March 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz