A High Regard for Scripture is Not Bibliolatry

Last updated on: February 15, 2017 at 9:26 am by Grayson Gilbert

A High Regard for Scripture is Not Bibliolatry 2017-02-15T09:26:59-05:00 Grayson Gilbert

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

photo-1470549638415-0a0755be0619_opt

There generally seems to be confusion when I have made the claim that some readers are denying the authority of the scriptures when they disagree on matters of orthodoxy (i.e. Trinitarian teaching, homosexuality, women pastors, and even pastoral blunders). Most will come back with a pithy reply that I am guilty of reductionism or even more simply, that I have a high level of arrogance in the confidence placed in my interpretive abilities. Others will make the charge that I am guilty of Bibliolatry, elevating the scriptures to a status that was never intended, usually because they sense the scriptures are merely the product of a less intellectually rigorous people.

Simply defined, Bibliolatry is an excessive adherence to a literal hermeneutic – but most people aren’t using it in this manner. It is meant to be a pejorative term to denote that I am indeed worshiping the Bible rather than the God of the Bible (Bible + Idolatry = Bibliolatry). The term Bibliolatry is designed to be a ploy, or buzzword, to reject the Bible rather than actually deal with the substance of what the text dictates, and the tracks carrying this train are built upon the foundations of denying the inspiration, clarity, sufficiency, and authority of the Bible.

Try as some might to say this is idol worship, the reality is that I follow a Protestant distinctive: scripture is the norma normans non normata, or more plainly, it is the norm that norms which cannot be normed. In other words, scripture is the final authority, even when I don’t initially like where that conclusion takes me in my studies. I don’t get to impose what I like upon the text; the text imposes upon my own faulty thinking and brings me into submission to it rather than the latter. If I am to study the scriptures properly, I must allow the text to speak for itself rather than make it say what I’d like it to say.

This means that ultimately, the scriptures are the authoritative means by which we develop a worldview and come to understand our culture through – not the other way around. The scriptures speak into cultural issues of the day, lending either credibility or incredibility to them. The scriptures determine morality and ethics, what is to be sanctioned, and what is to be practiced. The scriptures determine what is sinful and what is not – and it makes no qualms doing so.

The scriptures bring all ideologies, worldviews, and thought processes under submission and conform them to God’s own thoughts, placing one’s own thoughts (or the culturally sanctioned ideals) to secondary importance, and these respective processes are often in opposition to the scriptures. Most importantly though, the scriptures determine who God is and how He is to be worshipped and man has no freedom to treat this frivolously, and yet this is precisely what so many do.

Often, it is these same people would accuse me of bibliolatry, committing the ultimate heresy of placing the scriptures on a pedestal as “the fourth member of the Trinity.” However, I am going to suggest that what most people label “bibliolatry” is simply a pejorative expression that masks one’s biblical illiteracy or unwillingness to submit to the scripture’s teaching on some matters. In a more plain sense, those willing to throw around such a term are often the same who would adopt post-modernism or relativism when it comes to understanding of the scriptures, and subsequently, the authority of the scriptures is severely undercut.

Thus, they view the scriptures as ambiguous, unclear, subjective, and uninspired, and as a result, they are then free and clear in being able to reject what they will. This applies to the religious and the non-religious, for both have a set of particular blinders on that obstruct the clear meaning of the text. Part of this is due to the nature of sin, being that those in darkness love remaining in darkness, yet there are some subtleties and nuances particular to the individual. More clearly, subjectivism and relativism are the guiding hermeneutical principles, as they relate their own experience and understanding upon the text. The three dollar word for this is eisegesis.

Lest I am guilty of assuming I am incapable of some interpretive blind spots, I am the first to admit that we all have certain predispositions and biases that we come to study the text through. Quite naturally, I am going to see some things through Western eyes that my sub-Saharan brothers and sisters will see differently than I – yet again, scripture is the norm that norms, not our respective biases.

When I studied the scriptures as an atheist, my literary background forced me to reconcile with just how much I wanted to take certain genres out of their genre and read my atheistic views into the text. I had to let the scriptures be the norm that norms, meaning that I had to seek to the best of my abilities to let the text speak for itself. Scripture has one, clear, unambiguous meaning. Passages may have many applications, but they always have one intended meaning. The reader is obligated to draw this meaning out and submit themselves to it. The three dollar word for this is exegesis.

So why then would I be so bold to say that many are guilty of committing eisegesis on things like homosexuality, women pastors, the Trinity, the importance of the Virgin birth, etc.? Quite simply, for many, scripture is not the norm that norms which cannot be normed. There is a particular effort on their end to seek to “norm” the scriptures with the sentiments of a world opposed to God. Often enough, these arguments are peppered with enough bible verses shrouded in obscurity to cast aspersions on the clarity of the Bible, only to effectively save face. In a manner similar to Peter Enns, the only sin they see is the sin of certainty.

If you are to claim Christ, there is no other means by which you can effectively know the God that is. Many others have and will continue to deny the authority of the scriptures, whether by placing authority upon tradition, obscuring the text, seeking to find revelation of God elsewhere, and so forth. In the end, to them, the scriptures are not a sufficient and objective means to know God. To them, the scriptures are not the norm that norms all other things. Interestingly, the means by which we know of God’s redemptive plan from Genesis to Revelation, is due to there being a Genesis through Revelation. We know the early church was a literary church inasmuch as they were an auditory church; the contents of what was taught and heard in the early church is what we have today.

The aim of the piece is not to suggest that God could not, nor has not, used other means to reveal Himself to people throughout the ages – but simply that the scriptures are the primary means we know God and He has given us them for our benefit. Because this is the case, the scriptures are to be the norm that norms all other things. We are to submit ourselves to the teaching of the scriptures, understanding our rightful place under the authority of this God-given revelation. For those who claim Christ, it shouldn’t be a shocking thing that they submit themselves to the text, for Christ Himself believed this to be necessary.

Christ regularly demonstrated His wealth of knowledge in the scriptures by quoting it at length as He expounded upon the meaning (Luke 18:20; Mark 7:9-13; Matt. 7:12), denounced others for not truly knowing the scriptures because they did not know Christ (Matt 22:29; Mark 12:24), denounced taking away from or adding to it (Mark 7:1-12; Matt. 25:31), He did not do anything of His own accord, but submitted Himself to the Father’s will and the fulfillment of biblical prophecy (John 5:19, 6:38-39; Matt. 26:56), He astonished the religious leaders of His own day who knew He did not have formal training by His knowledge of the scriptures (Jn. 7:15), and He also maintained that the scriptures contained the same authority as His own spoken words, serving as a greater witness to the truth than His miraculous deeds, in bringing people to faith and obedience (Luke 16:29-31).

While one can have a deep affection for theology and the scriptures – yet miss the grand narrative of scripture, a high regard for the inerrancy, sufficiency, clarity, and necessity to ground one’s beliefs in them does not equate with the oft claimed bibliolatry. Instead, it displays a willingness to stand corrected by the text rather than seek to correct the text; it places man in his rightful place under the authority of divinely inspired, God-breathed revelation. Perhaps the idea here is more summarily presented by Johann Albrecht Bengel who wrote, “Apply yourself wholly to the text; apply the text wholly to yourself.”

Previous Post

February 11, 2017

Harmony in Cacophony: How to Select Biblical Songs for Corporate Worship

Next Post

February 15, 2017 Even with Swole Arms, Steven Furtick Still Unable to Lift Truth from Bible

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category #ShoutYourAbortion 10 Commandments 2016 Election 2017 2020 Election Abortion Accelerate Books Adultery America Andy Stanley Arminianism Ashley Madison Atonement B&H Academic Baptism Barry Horner Beauty Biblical Elders Billy Graham Blog Book Review Bruce Jenner Caitlyn Jenner Calvin Calvinism Cheating Chick-fil-A Children Christ Christian History Christian Living Christian Podcasts Christianity Christmas Church History Church Leadership Civil Disobedience Constitutional Coronavirus Culture Death Demoninations Discipleship Doctrine Doctrine of God Donald Trump Ecclesiology Entertainment Eschatology Ethics Evangelical Evangelism Evil Evolution Fear Forgive Yourself Forgiveness Francis Chan Future Israel Gay Marriage Gender Genesis George Floyd Gospel Government Gun Control Halloween hamartiology Heavenly Reward Hermeneutics History Hollywood Holy Spirit Homeschool Homosexual Homosexuality Hope Hospitality Humor Husband Infant Baptism Interview Jesus John Piper Josh Duggar Joshua Harris Judgment Justice Kathy Griffin Kim Davis Leadership Logic Love Manhood Marriage Martin Luther Messianic Prophecy Miscarriage Mocking Modesty Money Movie Reviews Music Music Review Netflix New Testament Obergefell Old Testament Parenting Pastor Pastoring Persecution Planned Parenthood Podcast Politics Pop Culture Pornography Prayer Preaching Predestination Pride Prosperity Gospel Rachel Held Evans Racism Ravi Zacharias Redemption Reformation 500 Reformation Day Reformed Theology Relationship Repentance Salvation Same Sex Marriage Satan Satire Scripture Seminary Sex Sin slavery Sola Scriptura Soteriology Sovereignty Spiritual Gifts Spurgeon Star Wars Steven Furtick Suffering Sufficiency of Scripture Sunday School Supreme Court Technology Testimony The Church The Lord of the Rings The Problem of Evil The Shack Theology Theonomy Tithing Transgenderism Tullian Tchividjian Uncategorized Universalism Vanity Fair Video Games Virgin Birth Voting Wife Women Worldview Worship

Select a Month June 2025 April 2025 March 2025 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 June 2023 April 2023 March 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz