Patheos

BuddhistCatholicContemplativeEvangelicalGeneral ChristianHinduJewishLatter-day SaintMuslimNew VisionsProgressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Patheos

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

chorusinthechaos

Cutting Hair To Save Lives: The Hopefulness of “Barbershop: The Next Cut”

Last updated on: April 28, 2016 at 11:53 pm   by Jonathan Dorst

Cutting Hair To Save Lives: The Hopefulness of “Barbershop: The Next Cut” 2016-04-28T23:53:23-05:00 Jonathan Dorst

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Barbershop-The-Next-Cut-posterWhen they said the third time is a charm, I don’t think they had movie sequels in mind (we’re still pretending The Godfather 3 never happened, right?). But, if you’ve got a good director, a good script and good actors, and you’re not just trying to remake the original (I’m talking to you, Hangover guys), the third time might be a charm, or at least charming.

In the third installment in the Barbershop franchise, Barbershop: The Next Cut, Ice Cube returns as Calvin, a small business owner trying to keep his business going, while also trying to keep his son Jalen from falling prey to the lure of the gangs in their Southside Chicago neighborhood. The Mayor’s office has come up with a plan to curb gang violence in the community, restricting traffic on the streets, that would actually threaten the small businesses in the neighborhood. In response, the employees and customers in the barbershop come up with the idea of calling for a ceasefire and making Calvin’s shop a Swiss-like neutral zone for everyone to come get a free haircut. Comedy mixes with drama in a surprisingly effective blend.

The movie that this one most reminded me of was Chi-raq (2015), a film made by Barbershop director Malcom Lee’s more famous cousin, Spike Lee. It too takes place in Chicago, with a predominantly black cast and gang violence at its core. Chi-raq gets its nickname from a moniker that local Chicagoans have for their city, fusing Chicago and Iraq and reminding us that war zones are not all located on foreign soil. Spike’s film is just as fed up with gang violence as Malcolm’s film, but the solution is different. Taking its cue from the ancient Greek play Lysistrata, it shows a group of women going on a sex strike to protest the violence in Chicago. This is certainly a more aggressive plan than offering free haircuts, especially when we see multiple scenes of women picketing with the slogan “No Peace, No Pu–y.” Both films have quite a bit to say about gender and race, namely that injustice and prejudice are alive and well. But, gender and race take a back seat in both films to the crisis of violence.

A cynic might look at these movies and ask, “Why are we entertaining such simplistic solutions to such a complex, horrific problem?” Why not offer deeper solutions, such as better educational initiatives, better legal representation for victims, and more and better job creation? One might cite a show like The Wire, which didn’t necessarily offer ideal solutions to inner-city violence, but was at least insightful into the multitude of challenges facing crime-ridden urban areas.

Granted, chastity belts and free haircuts may seem simplistic, but to only critique the solutions within the film is to ignore the essence of the film itself. A third solution to Chicago’s (and America’s) problem with violence is to address it through art. That’s what these filmmakers are doing, hoping to get a conversation going through the most popular form of art in modern culture, the movies. Whether you are moved or persuaded by the actions of the characters in Barbershop: The Next Cut and Chi-raq, they at least get the issue out in the open and force you to consider what you would do if you lived in their shoes.

A Christian viewing these films is challenged to consider how, or even if, a Christian might address gang violence. Does the gospel of the Prince of Peace have any practical implications for gun violence? Interestingly, one of the central characters in Chi-raq is a parish minister played by John Cusack who has an angry speech at the funeral of a little girl gunned down by crossfire, and then some challenging words for Nick Cannon’s gangster character. Cusack’s character is not the great white savior (a la Gene Hackman’s character in Mississippi Burning), but he is a positive force for good in the film. I think also of the book (and the 1970 movie) The Cross and the Switchblade which tells the true life story of Pastor David Wilkerson’s impact on New York gangs and gangleader Nicky Cruz.

It’s easy for pundits to talk about what should be done in high crime areas. But, maybe a prerequisite to offering solutions is to actually be on the ground. In the church, we call this ‘incarnational living’- being present with people in a similar way to how Jesus came to physically live among us rather than choosing to stay in heaven. Certainly, Spike Lee has been criticized for cultural appropriation, taking elements of the situation in Chicago and making a morality tale without investing himself in Chicago itself (reportedly, the mayor of Chicago asked Spike Lee not to use that name for the film). Most Christians, particularly wealthy Christians living and working in safe neighborhoods, who talk about tougher gun restrictions, stronger drug laws, increased police presence, education, or even evangelism as THE solution to violence, seem to be throwing darts, hoping to give answers to questions nobody is really asking them. On the other hand, if we believe that no man is an island, that we’re all connected despite race, nationality, or creed, every Christian ought to care about the lives of every inner-city youth and be willing to do what we can, even if it’s just pray.

That’s why I appreciated this movie. As the actor Common (Rashad in the film) said in an interview with Entertainment Weekly, “Some of the white audience, I think, is not aware of the conversation and what goes on in the black community, and [this film] gives them a peek into that. But, I think more than anything, when things have a certain authenticity to them, it doesn’t matter what color the storytellers are.” Barbershop: The Next Cut has a certain authenticity that makes it one of the best, certainly most hopeful, films I’ve seen this year.

Movie Reviews

Barbershop: The Next Cut

Previous Post



April 26, 2016

Local Layman Has Preached The Gospel For Years and Never Found Words Necessary

Next Post



April 29, 2016 Can Women be Pastors? (A Semi-Response to Scot Mcknight)


Browse Our Archives

Select a Category #ShoutYourAbortion 10 Commandments 2016 Election 2017 2020 Election Abortion Accelerate Books Adultery America Andy Stanley Arminianism Ashley Madison Atonement B&H Academic Baptism Barry Horner Beauty Biblical Elders Billy Graham Blog Book Review Bruce Jenner Caitlyn Jenner Calvin Calvinism Cheating Chick-fil-A Children Christ Christian History Christian Living Christian Podcasts Christianity Christmas Church History Church Leadership Civil Disobedience Constitutional Coronavirus Culture Death Demoninations Discipleship Doctrine Doctrine of God Donald Trump Ecclesiology Entertainment Eschatology Ethics Evangelical Evangelism Evil Evolution Fear Forgive Yourself Forgiveness Francis Chan Future Israel Gay Marriage Gender Genesis George Floyd Gospel Government Gun Control Halloween hamartiology Heavenly Reward Hermeneutics History Hollywood Holy Spirit Homeschool Homosexual Homosexuality Hope Hospitality Humor Husband Infant Baptism Interview Jesus John Piper Josh Duggar Joshua Harris Judgment Justice Kathy Griffin Kim Davis Leadership Logic Love Manhood Marriage Martin Luther Messianic Prophecy Miscarriage Mocking Modesty Money Movie Reviews Music Music Review Netflix New Testament Obergefell Old Testament Parenting Pastor Pastoring Persecution Planned Parenthood Podcast Politics Pop Culture Pornography Prayer Preaching Predestination Pride Prosperity Gospel Rachel Held Evans Racism Ravi Zacharias Redemption Reformation 500 Reformation Day Reformed Theology Relationship Repentance Salvation Same Sex Marriage Satan Satire Scripture Seminary Sex Sin slavery Sola Scriptura Soteriology Sovereignty Spiritual Gifts Spurgeon Star Wars Steven Furtick Suffering Sufficiency of Scripture Sunday School Supreme Court Technology Testimony The Church The Lord of the Rings The Problem of Evil The Shack Theology Theonomy Tithing Transgenderism Tullian Tchividjian Uncategorized Universalism Vanity Fair Video Games Virgin Birth Voting Wife Women Worldview Worship

Select a Month June 2025 April 2025 March 2025 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 June 2023 April 2023 March 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014


Follow Us!

Follow Us on Facebook Follow Us on Twitter



TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

True or False: Romans teaches that whoever calls on the name of the Lord will be saved.

Select your answer to see how you score.

TRUE FALSE

Related posts from The Chorus In The Chaos

Evangelical

The Serious Comedy of 'Instant Family'

The Chorus In The Chaos

Evangelical

'A Quiet Place': A Story of Sacrifice in...

The Chorus In The Chaos

Evangelical

What is a Heretic? Netflix's 'Christian Film' Come...

The Chorus In The Chaos

Evangelical

How Was Samson Righteous? A Review of Pure...

The Chorus In The Chaos

TRENDING AT PATHEOS Evangelical

Creation as Secondary to Judgment

Creating is a most human act. A good canonical (classical) education will...

The REST of Your Life: A Creative Wrestles...

This week I had a conversation with a good friend from church....

How the author of the world's best hymn...

I've been working with John Newton for a while now. This makes...

Psalm 130 | Lectio Divina

Long before this Lectio Divina, Psalm 130 - the song - started...

What About the Trees? Another Living Parable

After I finished writing the last article about falling leaves as a...

Why Classical Education Is a Conversation, Not a...

Come and Read: Joy in Classical Education When I was a little...

view all Evangelical blogs

Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Copyright 2008-2026, Patheos. All rights reserved.

Subscription Support Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube