Theonomy: An Introduction

Last updated on: April 13, 2016 at 7:32 am by Grayson Gilbert

Theonomy: An Introduction 2016-04-13T07:32:24-05:00 Grayson Gilbert

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Photo Attribution: “St Georges Hall Court Room” By Michael D Beckworth; CC 2.0

As an introduction to the topic of Theonomy, it seemed best to break this down into three parts. Through this series, the first post will give a basic outline to some of the main principles of Theonomy; the second, a critique to these principles; the third, a final synopsis with some closing notes. Though I would hardly qualify myself as an expert in Theonomy, able to refute each and every point with the utmost eloquence, I am aiming to show why Theonomic Rule is not a hermeneutically consistent interpretation for the NT believer.

However, before engaging on any of these claims – it is pertinent to give a brief summation to Theonomy. It is particularly difficult to peg down consistency between theonomists of different strips, so what I will seek to do is simply adapt a summary from Greg Bahnsen’s contribution to Five Views on Law and Gospel

The revelatory scriptures in their entirety are infallible, inerrant, and useful in all that they teach on any subject.
Upholding theonomic rule or principles do not merit favor with God in respect to salvation. Upholding the law, then, is a commitment to obedience in the basis of faith, in gratitude for the free gift of grace.
The scriptures are the sole, supreme, and unchallengeable standard by which man operates in all areas of life; this naturally includes the moral directives (law).
Our obligation to uphold the moral law is not to be judged by extra-biblical standards (i.e. traditions, cultural whims and practices, feelings, etc.).
Moral laws are to be assumed as binding unless specifically otherwise indicated by further revelation.
The new covenant surpasses the old in glory, power, and finality. The new covenant also surpasses “shadows” of the old, changing the applications of sacrificial, purity, and separation principles found in the OT – thus indicating a redefinition of the people of God and changing the significance of the Promised Land.
These laws are a reflection of God’s immutable (unchanging) character and are subsequently absolute, being established in advance of any given scenario, circumstance, or changing attitudes. Thus, they are applicable in general types of moral situations.
Christian politics must be operated under the auspices of God’s unchanging nature, thusly, operating under recognition of the revealed law as a standard to judge all social codes.
Civil magistrates (governing authorities) in all times and places are bound to conduct their practices as servants of God. They are agents of divine wrath against criminals, the unrepentant, and the unbelieving. For this they will give an account before the Lord on the basis of this performance.
This general continuity is not regulated only to governing authorities, but to all spheres of ethics: personal, family, and ecclesiastical.
The precepts given in the OT “judicial” laws are a perfect model for social justice in all cultures – even in the punishment of criminals. Outside of these laws, civil rulers are not authorized to legislate or use coercion (i.e. in the economic marketplace).
The morally acceptable way for Christians to correct social evils that are not under lawful jurisdiction of the state is by means of voluntary and loving enterprises (i.e. in the home, church, and marketplace). Thus, violent revolution and retribution are not the proper methods for changing the political order. This is accomplished through dependence on regeneration, reeducation, and gradual legal reform.

While this is not an exhaustive list of every nuance to this theological viewpoint, it will nonetheless prove helpful in all that I seek to discuss. As you will notice, there is much here that can and should be easily agreed with. However, there are still problematic inferences made from the usage and understanding of the term “law”, including underlying hermeneutical principles which undoubtedly affect the theonomist’s position.

In the next post, I will interact with what I believe to be a misunderstanding of the Law’s purpose, as well as the underlying assumptions of the theonomist understanding of the law and continuity between covenant people, according to some of these points. I will further serve to illustrate the Law’s fundamental importance – and current role in the life of the NT believer.

Click Here to Read Part 1 In This Series, Thenomy: An Introduction

Click Here to Read Part 2 In This Series, Theonomy: A Critique

Click Here to Read Part 3 In This Series, Thenomy: Closing Remarks

Previous Post

February 12, 2015

The Greatest "Christian" Movie Ever Made

Next Post

March 5, 2015 "Birdman" Movie Review (The Unexpected Virtue Of Long Takes)

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category #ShoutYourAbortion 10 Commandments 2016 Election 2017 2020 Election Abortion Accelerate Books Adultery America Andy Stanley Arminianism Ashley Madison Atonement B&H Academic Baptism Barry Horner Beauty Biblical Elders Billy Graham Blog Book Review Bruce Jenner Caitlyn Jenner Calvin Calvinism Cheating Chick-fil-A Children Christ Christian History Christian Living Christian Podcasts Christianity Christmas Church History Church Leadership Civil Disobedience Constitutional Coronavirus Culture Death Demoninations Discipleship Doctrine Doctrine of God Donald Trump Ecclesiology Entertainment Eschatology Ethics Evangelical Evangelism Evil Evolution Fear Forgive Yourself Forgiveness Francis Chan Future Israel Gay Marriage Gender Genesis George Floyd Gospel Government Gun Control Halloween hamartiology Heavenly Reward Hermeneutics History Hollywood Holy Spirit Homeschool Homosexual Homosexuality Hope Hospitality Humor Husband Infant Baptism Interview Jesus John Piper Josh Duggar Joshua Harris Judgment Justice Kathy Griffin Kim Davis Leadership Logic Love Manhood Marriage Martin Luther Messianic Prophecy Miscarriage Mocking Modesty Money Movie Reviews Music Music Review Netflix New Testament Obergefell Old Testament Parenting Pastor Pastoring Persecution Planned Parenthood Podcast Politics Pop Culture Pornography Prayer Preaching Predestination Pride Prosperity Gospel Rachel Held Evans Racism Ravi Zacharias Redemption Reformation 500 Reformation Day Reformed Theology Relationship Repentance Salvation Same Sex Marriage Satan Satire Scripture Seminary Sex Sin slavery Sola Scriptura Soteriology Sovereignty Spiritual Gifts Spurgeon Star Wars Steven Furtick Suffering Sufficiency of Scripture Sunday School Supreme Court Technology Testimony The Church The Lord of the Rings The Problem of Evil The Shack Theology Theonomy Tithing Transgenderism Tullian Tchividjian Uncategorized Universalism Vanity Fair Video Games Virgin Birth Voting Wife Women Worldview Worship

Select a Month June 2025 April 2025 March 2025 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 June 2023 April 2023 March 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz