Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Chaos and Old Night

Home
Catholic
AOC, climate change, abortion, and me

AOC, climate change, abortion, and me

Last updated on: March 5, 2019 at 1:16 am by Sean P. Dailey

AOC, climate change, abortion, and me 2019-03-05T01:16:39-05:00 Sean P. Dailey

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

I woke up Sunday morning to the below comment on Facebook, in response to the screenshot that accompanies this article, which I had posted on my wall:

I laugh at this because you think AOC is logical about saving the planet but you still don’t defend the life of unborn babies and mock people who even try to defend them. So her and you together are bigger hypocrites than Hitler defending Jews. You could defend actual life on Earth but instead you pretend it’s all about the health of dirt and furry animals. Oh, side note. F— your biblical reference to try to make yourself seem like a good Catholic.

Thank you for sharing. My advice: don’t post while drunk.

Furthermore, an authentic pro-life stance defends both the environment and the unborn. But don’t take my word for it. Pope Francis says this in his encyclical, Laudato Si. Specifically, he chastises environmentalists who don’t care about the unborn:

Since everything is interrelated, concern for the protection of nature is also incompatible with the justification of abortion. How can we genuinely teach the importance of concern for other vulnerable beings, however troublesome or inconvenient they may be, if we fail to protect a human embryo, even when its presence is uncomfortable and creates difficulties? “If personal and social sensitivity towards the acceptance of the new life is lost, then other forms of acceptance that are valuable for society also wither away”

But he also chastises those who would separate stewardship for the environment from other issues, including abortion:

It cannot be emphasized enough how everything is interconnected. Time and space are not independent of one another, and not even atoms or subatomic particles can be considered in isolation. Just as the different aspects of the planet – physical, chemical and biological – are interrelated, so too living species are part of a network which we will never fully explore and understand. A good part of our genetic code is shared by many living beings…. When we speak of the “environment,” what we really mean is a relationship existing between nature and the society which lives in it. Nature cannot be regarded as something separate from ourselves or as a mere setting in which we live. We are part of nature, included in it and thus in constant interaction with it.

The Supreme Court

Second, Roe v. Wade is not going to be overturned anytime soon. I’ll type that again: Roe v. Wade is, most likely, not going to be overturned. Attorney Lillian Vogl goes into the details why here. But the reality is, both major parties want abortion to remain legal. The only difference is, the Republicans lie to you about it. The Democrats don’t.

Five of the seven Justices who voted to legalize abortion in Roe—Harry Blackmun (who wrote the majority opinion), Warren E. Burger, William Brennan, Potter Stewart, and Lewis Powell—were Republicans.

All five justices who voted to uphold Roe in Planned Parenthood v. Casey—Sandra Day O’Connor, Anthony Kennedy, David Souter, John P. Stevens, and Justice Blackmun—were Republicans.

Two Justices dissented in both cases, Byron White and William Rehnquist. Justice White was a Democrat—a Kennedy appointee.

But the gist is, abortion was made legal because of Republicans. It remains legal because of Republicans. If the current Court gets another test case, Chief Justice John Roberts likely will join the liberal wing to protect legal abortion (he already has), and he may be joined by Justice Brett Kavanaugh (as has already happened).

Authentic care for the unborn

Given the unlikelihood of the Supreme Court overturning Roe, if pro-lifers really care about the unborn, the logical thing to do is to support policies that will reduce the abortion rate. The reasons that women seek abortions are complex and interrelated, but most women who seek one do so out of economic hardship (yes, the data is from the Guttmacher Institute, but pro-life groups rely on the data too).

So the thing to do, if one really cares about the unborn, is to reduce, as much as possible, the reasons women seek abortions, especially by working to enact policies such as universal health care, child care, job training, and so on.

In America, it costs about $32,000 for an uncomplicated, vaginal birth, but between $350 and $950 for an abortion in the first trimester. Imagine a single mother, in poverty, scared and alone, with no insurance, weighing her options. Which do you think she’ll choose?

But pro-lifers won’t support social safety net policies that will provide these women with a real choice. They ignore the demand side of this equation, and the reasons for that demand, and focus only on the supply. Which is why they look like cruel, sadistic misogynists to everyone not in their bubble.

Those who reject our responsibility to be good stewards of our environment, and who reject policies that will reduce the abortion rate, are the hypocrites. Not me. And not Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez.

alarms and discursions

Catholic Church

politics

abortion

Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez

Previous Post

March 1, 2019

Beware of unqualified people - UPDATED

Next Post

March 5, 2019 This Lent, winter is coming

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Advent/Christmas alarms and discursions American history appreciations and criticisms Arts and entertainment Catholic Church G.K. Chesterton Illinois J.R.R Tolkien Lent Nazi watch politics religion Uncategorized

Select a Month July 2021 June 2021 January 2021 November 2020 October 2020 August 2020 July 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 August 2019 July 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Which sea did God part for the Israelites to escape Egypt?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Red Sea Dead Sea Jordan River Sea of Galilee