Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Cooperative Baptist Fellowship

Home
About

Home
Progressive Christian
More or Less? A groaning Earth and our unsustainable impact

More or Less? A groaning Earth and our unsustainable impact

Last updated on: November 9, 2016 at 10:51 pm by Guest Contributor

More or Less? A groaning Earth and our unsustainable impact 2016-11-09T22:51:29-04:00 Guest Contributor

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

By Sam Harrell

More or Less?

Every political candidate promises more. More jobs, more trade, more income, more energy.

We are habituated to everything good being about new, better and more. Even where there is a realization that we need to clean up our act — cleaner energy sources, recycling, greater efficiency — we want more and more of it. The discard pile grows and usually what is gained in efficiency is quickly outpaced by our appetite for more.

Sam Harrell

Sam Harrell facilitates the work of global field personnel with the Cooperative Baptist Fellowship.

Let’s face it, no one gets elected by advocating for less, for scaling down, for conserving, for stepping down a rung on the ladder. No, our liberal democracy is obsessed with the notion that we have the right to happiness and happiness, to us, is more.

And we say we want everyone to have it. In theory at least, we want the multitude of ‘the poor’ to have access to more. To healthcare, to shelter, to jobs, to stuff. And why shouldn’t they? After all, our notion of equality means we should all have access to the same stuff and, since we’re not planning to reduce our expectations of consumption, accumulation, MORE, that means we need to make room where we are for all those ‘down there’ to join us here ‘up here.’

Ever thought about what China would look like if they had the number of cars per capita that we have?

Ever thought what it would take for folks living in Calcutta, Kinshasa or Mexico City to enjoy the same standard of living as folks in London, New York, or Los Angeles?

Get serious! It would take several earths to generate the number of resources necessary to sustain a global population at anywhere near a western level of appetite for goods, services and ‘more.’ So where does that leave us? It leaves us in a perilously precarious predicament!

Already, the Earth is groaning under the weight of our unsustainable impact. Environmental science makes use of a simple formula to demonstrate sustainability: I (Environmental Impact) = P (Population growth) x A (Affluence/consumption levels) x T (Technological efficiency).

I=PAT.

Needless to say, our negative impact on the environment continues to rise to greater heights of unsustainability due to unrestrained population growth, increasing consumption and technological efficiencies that can’t (and won’t) be expected to keep pace with our numbers or appetites.

One study shows that in order for impact to be neutralized according to a western ‘diet’ at current consumption levels and rates of technological advancement, we would need to reduce our numbers to 2.8 billion.

We are approaching 8 billion and conservative predictions are that by 2100 we will hit the 10 billion mark. Many scientists are already resigned to talking about a 6th (Anthropocene) extinction. Our own.

I’m not a fortuneteller or a futurist but I believe I can confidently state that we’re headed in the wrong direction.

I suggest we at least change directions by looking to faith and common sense for a solution. “Pray to God and tie your camel,” as the saying goes. My faith teaches that God is a God of all. Not just me, my type and my kind, but all. That includes ‘the earth and all that is in it.’

The rule I seek to follow is love of God, neighbor and self. In essence, my ‘neighbor’ extends beyond my neighborhood, my race and even my species. ‘Salvation’ in my faith system is modeled on becoming less, not more, for the sake of the other.

It’s about dying to self and finding new life in Love. It’s about descent, not ascent. About ‘falling upwards,’ and about the last being first. Commons sense would seem to indicate that in the long run, less is more.

This is part-1 of a two-part series.

Sam Harrell has lived most of his life in East Africa where he engaged the people and the land in the context of community-based development as director of Africa Exchange, a non-profit organization in Kenya. The proximity of his work at the intersection of natural systems and human survival provides a unique perspective from which to engage the future. Sam currently facilitates the work of global field personnel as associate coordinator of Global Missions for the Cooperative Baptist Fellowship.

Previous Post

October 27, 2016

#girlsmatter — Race and Human Trafficking

Next Post

November 2, 2016 The Baptist heritage of religious liberty for all

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Advent Advocacy Baptist Black Lives Matter Campbell University CCM Chaplain Children Church Starts Clergy Sexual Misconduct Coaching Culture Environment Equality Ethics Events Field Personnel Health History Human Trafficking Immigration Interfaith Interviews Lent Ministry Missions Payday Pentecost Politics Prayer Race Refugees Religious Liberty Sermon Spirituality Theology Uncategorized United Nations Women Worship Young Adults

Select a Month November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 February 2016

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz