Judge temporarily blocks Texas’ ‘dismemberment abortion’ ban

Last updated on: September 6, 2017 at 6:04 am by CNA Daily News

Judge temporarily blocks Texas’ ‘dismemberment abortion’ ban 2017-09-06T06:04:00+00:00 CNA Daily News

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Austin, Texas, Sep 6, 2017 / 12:04 am (CNA/EWTN News).- A federal judge on Thursday temporarily blocked part of a Texas law that bans dilation-and-evacuation abortions in the second trimester.

“While some pro-lifers may be tempted to despair at today’s ruling, this is the first step in a longer and consequential legal battle over this dynamic and historic legislation,” Texas Right to Life said in an Aug. 31 statement.

The group said the important question is “whether this type of procedure is something Texas has the right to prohibit,” not how it will affect women and the abortion industry, as the plaintiffs’ lawyers have said.

The abortion rule in question bars “dismemberment abortions,” which use forceps and other instruments to remove the fetus from the womb, the Associated Press reports. Critics of the law say “dismemberment abortion” is not a medical term.

Texas Right to Life, however, defended the law.

“The Dismemberment Abortion Ban outlaws a specific abortion procedure in which a living preborn child is killed by being torn limb from limb in utero,” the group said.

The Center for Reproductive Rights, which is a party to the lawsuit challenging the measure, says the procedure is the safest and most common way to perform an abortion in the second trimester of pregnancy.

U.S. District Judge Lee Yeakel granted the temporary restraining order on the law Aug. 31, saying it was in the public interest to preserve the status quo and allow the parties to the case to put the constitutional questions on record “without subjecting plaintiffs or the public to any of the act’s potential harms.”

The judge has set a Sept. 14 hearing on the case.

Texas Right to Life said the law is defensible under the 2007 U.S. Supreme Court ruling Gonzales v. Carhart, which says states have a “compelling interest in protecting the integrity and ethics of the medical profession and in protecting the life of the preborn child.”

Courts have blocked similar laws in Alabama, Kansas, Louisiana, and Oklahoma.

The abortion ban is part of Senate Bill 8, which was passed this year response to a 2016 U.S. Supreme Court ruling that struck down a 2013 state law that helped close more than half of Texas’ abortion clinics. There are now about 20 abortion clinics in the state, compared to 41 in 2012.

Previous Post

September 6, 2017

Bishop Tobin: Ending DACA shatters lives. So does abortion.

Next Post

September 6, 2017 Simplicity and transparency are key to Pope Francis' Colombia trip

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Americas Asia - Pacific Europe Middle East - Africa Uncategorized US Vatican

Select a Month November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Which prophet predicted God would pour out His Spirit on all people?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Micah Hosea Joel Amos