Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Catholic News

Home

Home
Catholic
Religion News
A deeper look at the ‘filial correction’ of Pope Francis

A deeper look at the ‘filial correction’ of Pope Francis

Last updated on: September 29, 2017 at 10:26 pm by CNA Daily News

A deeper look at the ‘filial correction’ of Pope Francis 2017-09-29T22:26:00+00:00 CNA Daily News

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Washington D.C., Sep 29, 2017 / 04:26 pm (CNA).- After Catholic scholars issued what they termed a “filial correction” of Pope Francis, what exactly were their charges and how should a Catholic receive the letter?

The filial correction “represents the concerns of some among the Catholic faithful at what are being perceived more broadly speaking as the Pope’s intended teachings, but which may not accurately represent the Pope’s actual teachings,” Dr. Jacob Wood, a theology professor at the Franciscan University of Steubenville, told CNA.

The letter “is the manifestation of the opinion and concerns of those theologians who have signed it,” Wood explained. It is “not an authoritative statement of the meaning of the documents that it discusses,” he added.

More than 60 Catholic clergy and scholars originally sent a letter to Pope Francis on August 11 as a “filial correction” for “heretical positions” that the Pope has “effectively upheld.”

The 25-page “Correctio filialis de haeresibus propagates” by the clergy and scholars, who now number over 100, says that through “Amoris Laetitia” and in “other words, deeds and omissions of Your Holiness,” there has been a “propagation of heresies” that must be addressed concerning “marriage, the moral life, and the reception of the sacraments.”

They noted that Pope Francis has not answered the “dubia,” or questions regarding ambiguous or unclear sections of Amoris Laetitia, which were expressed privately to him in a letter from four cardinals in September 2016, and made public in November 2016.

The four cardinals were Cardinal Raymond Burke; Cardinal Walter Brandmüller, president emeritus of the Pontifical Committee for Historical Sciences; and the recently-deceased Cardinals Carlo Caffarra, Archbishop Emeritus of Bologna and Joachim Meisner, Archbishop Emeritus of Cologne.

The “correction,” released to the public this week, charges that bishops are teaching that divorced and remarried couples can sacrilegiously receive Holy Communion, because of the Pope’s actions, and his apparent decision not to publicly respond to the “dubia.”

“They are accusing Pope Francis of being responsible for people denying basic Catholic doctrine about what constitutes a mortal sin,” Wood said.

Many of the authors have worked “a lifetime in theological study,” he said, and while the scholars’ charge that Pope Francis is at least leading to the propagation of heresy “is significant,” it also “causes a great deal of controversy in the Church, and not a little bit of scandal.”

“The fact that people would feel the need to say this,” he added, “does not mean that they are perfectly justified in doing so, or that they’ve gone about it in all the right ways.”

The filial correction differs from the “dubia” in two key aspects, Wood said.

First, the “dubia” were authored by cardinals who, “in canon law,” do “enjoy a special relationship to the Pope. They’re closer to the Pope, as regards the structure of the Church,” Wood said.

Cardinals “have a greater responsibility to address their concerns directly to the Pope,” he said.

Also, the “dubia” pose “respectful questions for the Holy Father,” Wood said, giving him “the chance to answer them as he sees fit.” Meanwhile, the letter of filial correction “assumes that we have heretical propositions,” he said, which is a matter subject to dispute.

The letter clearly accuses Pope Francis of aiding the spread of heresy, Wood said, but the authors make no specific charges of heresy against the Pope himself.

“The sin of heresy,” he said, “is committed when a member of the Catholic faithful knowingly and willingly denies a doctrine of the Christian faith.”

However, he said, the authors admit that “they are not in a position to judge” whether Pope Francis “is a formal heretic.”

Furthermore, the authors add that they cannot charge the Pope “with the canonical crime of heresy” because they lack “the ecclesiastical jurisdiction” to do so.

Rather, they claim to correct the Pope “on inaction in condemning seven propositions [of heresy],” Wood said, and thus “the title of the filial correction is in some ways misleading.”

In the letter, explained Wood, “the Pope is merely being accused by these theologians of inaction in condemning heresy that they don’t have the authority to claim that he actually committed.”

The letter poses “the danger of scandal,” he said, because the authors are “attributing heretical propositions to the Pope, when those heretical propositions are not demonstrated as coming directly from the Pope’s writings.”

Catholics should remember that the scholars are not members of the Church Magisterium, he said, and Catholics need not agree with their “correctio.”

Previous Post

September 29, 2017

From the editor: Why are the comment boxes gone?

Next Post

September 29, 2017 Puerto Rican bishops offer message of hope after hurricanes

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Americas Asia - Pacific Europe Middle East - Africa Uncategorized US Vatican

Select a Month November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Who prophesied against Tyre, predicting it would become a bare rock?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Ezekiel Daniel Joel Amos