The danger of forcing doctors to perform gender transitions

Last updated on: October 14, 2016 at 9:08 am by CNA Daily News

The danger of forcing doctors to perform gender transitions 2016-10-14T09:08:00+00:00 CNA Daily News

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Washington D.C., Oct 14, 2016 / 03:08 am (CNA/EWTN News).- A recent federal rule has come under fire for denying doctors the ability to exercise discretion in deciding whether to perform gender transition surgeries in particular cases.

The regulation requires doctors to perform the surgeries when asked to do so – including on children – even if it is their medical opinion that the procedure could end up harming the patient.

Dozens of lawmakers voiced their objections to the mandate, saying that it could end up harming the “most vulnerable.”

“Children are some of the most vulnerable in our population, and this rule strips doctors of their ability to counsel and advise the best course of medical care in their professional judgment if they believe gender transition procedures to be harmful,” an Oct. 7 letter to Secretary of Health and Human Services Sylvia Burwell from 47 members of Congress stated.

Over the summer, the Department of Health and Human Services announced that health providers could not refuse treatment for “gender transition” services if they were asked for them.

There is no clear religious exemption in the mandate. Religious health providers like the Franciscan Alliance hospital network and the Christian Medical & Dental Associations, represented by the Becket Fund for Religious Liberty, have filed a lawsuit against the mandate. Five states – Texas, Kansas, Kentucky, Nebraska, and Wisconsin – joined the lawsuit.

The mandate could apply to over 900,000 physicians, the HHS has estimated.

Last Friday, 47 members of Congress signed a letter to Secretary Burwell outlining their concerns with the mandate. Rep. Joe Pitts (R-Pa.), chair of the House Energy and Commerce Committee’s Health Subcommittee, led the group.

“First, this rule for the first time in history requires doctors to perform gender transition procedures or treatments on patients including children, even if the doctor believes the procedures could be harmful,” the members wrote. If doctors refuse to obey the mandate, they could be subject to “massive financial penalties and even job loss,” they added.

The evidence is not conclusive that gender transition is healthy, and some studies show it can cause harm to adults long after a surgery, the letter insisted.

“HHS’ own experts have acknowledged that the clinical literature is ‘inconclusive’ on whether gender reassignment surgery improves health outcomes for Medicare beneficiaries with gender dysphoria, and that some studies have ‘reported harms,’” the letter noted.

For instance, guidance from a group cited by the HHS – the World Professional Association for Transgender Help – listed studies showing that for the vast majority of children with gender dysphoria, the experience is only temporary.

Another report released over the summer by the journal The New Atlantis agreed, finding that “only a minority of children who experience cross-gender identification will continue to do so into adolescence or adulthood.”

Among its findings were that “compared to the general population, adults who have undergone sex-reassignment surgery continue to have a higher risk of experiencing poor mental health outcomes. One study found that, compared to controls, sex-reassigned individuals were about 5 times more likely to attempt suicide and about 19 times more likely to die by suicide.”

Johns Hopkins University, once a pioneer in sex reassignment surgery, has since ended the practice, finding that it was actually damaging to those who undergo it.

In light of studies like these showing possible harm for those undergoing gender transition, the HHS should not be coming down on one side of the debate by mandating such procedures, the letter insisted.

“Sensitive, difficult medical decisions should be between a family and their doctor, not government bureaucrats,” Lori Windham, senior counsel of the Becket Fund for Religious Liberty, stated in the letter.

“The government continues to speak out of both sides of its mouth,” she continued. “The military rightly gives doctors freedom to care for patients according to their medical judgment because it acknowledges the risks of transgender medical procedures, particularly for children; yet HHS tramples on doctors’ medical judgment, even for potentially harmful procedures for children.”

Previous Post

October 14, 2016

Nun who witnessed multiple Eucharistic miracles on path to sainthood

Next Post

October 14, 2016 Venezuelan Fr. Arturo Sosa elected as new head of Jesuit order

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Americas Asia - Pacific Europe Middle East - Africa Uncategorized US Vatican

Select a Month November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Who said, "Let there be light"?

Select your answer to see how you score.

God Moses Paul Elijah