US Bishops to government: End legal standoff with the Little Sisters

Last updated on: September 12, 2016 at 8:50 pm by CNA Daily News

US Bishops to government: End legal standoff with the Little Sisters 2016-09-12T20:50:00+00:00 CNA Daily News

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Washington D.C., Sep 12, 2016 / 02:50 pm (CNA/EWTN News).- The United States government has an opportunity to end its legal battle with the Little Sisters of the Poor and the administration must “seize that opportunity,” legal experts are maintaining.

“In a nation dedicated to religious liberty, church-state conflict on this scale should be avoided whenever possible – and once started, ended as soon and as agreeably as possible,” legal counsel for the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops stated in Sept. 9 comments to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services.

They added that “it has now been spelled out with particular clarity how the Administration can achieve its stated policy goals without forcing those with sincerely held religious objections to assist.”

The health care law, passed in 2010, ordered that “preventative care” be covered in all health plans. In regulations released later on, the Department of Health and Human Services interpreted that to mandate coverage for contraceptives, sterilizations, and drugs that can cause early abortions.

Afterwards, the administration announced a process for non-profits to “opt-out” of the mandate, but many groups – including Catholic dioceses and the Little Sisters of the Poor – said the so-called accommodation still forced them to violate their religious beliefs against cooperating with contraceptive use. Over 300 plaintiffs have sued the administration over the mandate and its “accommodation.”

The case against the mandate of the Little Sisters and other petitioners like the Archdiocese of Washington and Bishop David Zubik of Pittsburgh was heard by the Supreme Court last year.

After hearing oral arguments in the case, the court requested supplemental briefs by both the petitioners and the administration that would outline possible alternative means of providing contraception coverage for employees of objecting non-profits while respecting the consciences of the nuns and other religious employers.

After receiving the briefs, the court in May sent the case back to the lower courts and said that both the nuns and the administration should find a solution.

“Following oral argument, the Court requested supplemental briefing from the parties addressing ‘whether contraceptive coverage could be provided to petitioners’ employees, through petitioners’ insurance companies, without any such notice from petitioners,” the court noted. “Both petitioners and the Government now confirm that such an option is feasible.”

However, Bishop Zubik of Pittsburgh, one of the plaintiffs in the case, said in August that the administration was being “extremely aggressive” and was “apparently trying to take over” his diocese’s health plans by forcing the third-party administrator of the plans to provide contraceptive coverage.

Now the administration is taking comments on whether an alternative solution can satisfy the Little Sisters and other petitioners “while still ensuring that the affected women seamlessly receive full and equal health coverage, including contraceptive coverage.”

Such a solution does exist, the USCCB comments affirmed. There is only one path to an agreement on the matter, and that is if the Little Sisters and other non-profits come up with the modifications to the mandate, they stated.

If insurers for the non-profits have to provide the contraception coverage, they continued, it must be provided as the plaintiffs had previously requested – “truly independent of petitioners and their plans” such as “through a separate policy, with a separate enrollment process, a separate insurance card, and a separate payment source, and offered to individuals through a separate communication.”

There are concrete ways to achieve this, the comments noted. For instance, employees seeking contraception coverage could have a separate plan for it under the same insurer, like they might have for dental or vision coverage. They could also purchase a health plan with contraception coverage on the state exchanges set up under the Affordable Care Act. The government could also create a separate plan to provide the coverage.

However, the bishops in no way endorse the use of contraceptives, which is against Church teaching, the comments insisted. Rather, they are pointing out that alternative methods exist for employees to have contraception coverage – which is the government’s goal – while not forcing religious groups to violate their beliefs.

“The intended effect of contraceptives is to take a perfectly healthy human reproductive system and render it temporarily or permanently infertile. As a matter of sound health care policy and practice, this is entirely backwards, as the goal of medicine, properly understood, is to cure or prevent health problems,” the comments explained.

“Contraceptives not only fail to cure or prevent health problems, they actually cause such problems. Indeed, today there is a virtual cottage industry of litigation against pharmaceutical manufacturers involving injuries resulting from contraceptive use,” they added, noting the HHS’s own research showing a heightened risk of cancer from the use of oral contraceptives.

“The petitioners have done their part by describing, in good faith and in great detail, a way to reach an amicable resolution. But the petitioners cannot change the regulations – only the Administration can do that. And so once again, we urge the Administration, in the strongest possible terms, to do its part to end this well, by choosing to pursue its policy goals in a way that fully respects – rather than knowingly disregards – the sincerely held and repeatedly stated religious objections of a substantial minority of our civil society.”

Previous Post

September 11, 2016

Tim Kaine claims Catholic Church could change on gay marriage

Next Post

September 12, 2016 Woman charged in foiled attack on Notre Dame cathedral

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Americas Asia - Pacific Europe Middle East - Africa Uncategorized US Vatican

Select a Month November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What city was Paul heading to when he encountered Jesus?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Rome Jerusalem Antioch Damascus