St. Louis priest falsely accused by anti-sex abuse group

Last updated on: August 25, 2016 at 4:25 pm by CNA Daily News

St. Louis priest falsely accused by anti-sex abuse group 2016-08-25T16:25:00+00:00 CNA Daily News

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

St. Louis, Mo., Aug 25, 2016 / 10:25 am (CNA/EWTN News).- A group for clergy sex abuse victims made false statements “negligently and with reckless disregard for the truth” against a St. Louis priest to try to convict him on abuse charges, a federal judge has ruled.

U.S. District Judge Carol E. Jackson said that the Survivors' Network of those Abused by Priests failed to comply with a court order that the group supply details about those who accused Father Xiu Hui “Joseph” Jiang of sexual abuse. This made it impossible for him to litigate the claims against him.

Jackson said the court will establish that SNAP's statements “were false and that they did not conduct any inquiry into the truth or falsity of these public statements.”

The court will also establish that defendants conspired to secure Fr. Jiang's conviction on sex abuse charges due to “discriminatory animus against plaintiff based on his religion, religious vocation, race, and national origin,” the St. Louis Post-Dispatch reports.

SNAP must cover Fr. Jiang's “reasonable expenses, including attorneys' fees,” the court said.

The priest was criminally charged in 2014 of sexually abusing a boy in a Catholic school bathroom in 2011 and 2012. St. Louis prosecutors dropped the charges last year.

Soon after the criminal charges were dropped, Fr. Jiang filed a lawsuit alleging conspiracy and defamation against the boy’s parents and SNAP leaders David Clohessy and Barbara Dorris. The lawsuit also charged that police wrongly pursued him based on his religious and racial background.

The judge’s sanctions reportedly apply specifically to SNAP, not other defendants.

On June 27 the judge had ordered that the group provide detailed information about those making complaints against Fr. Jiang, including emails, text messages and contact information. The group argued that its information was protected by a “rape crisis center privilege.”

The judge said such a privilege doesn’t exist. She said SNAP made “repeated assertions of a nonexistent privilege” when it could have proposed alternatives like targeted redaction of names of third-party victims or made disclosures for attorneys-eyes only.

SNAP said it turned over “hundreds of pages” of redacted documents to the priest’s lawyers.

The group also refused Judge Jackson's order to turn over all records of donations it received from the law firm Chackes, Carlson & Gorovosky, a firm that has handled sex abuse cases. Clohessey said the firm donated to SNAP from the years 2005-12. He said he does not know why the priest’s lawyers want the information.

Clohessey said SNAP was concerned about “the ability of victims and alleged victims to report predators and be protected.” He told the Post-Dispatch that the lawsuit sought “to make sure that yet another alleged victim, witness or whistleblower stays silent.”

Fr. Jiang had been previously accused of improper contact with a teenage girl who attended the Basilica of St. Louis, where he was associate pastor. Charges of child endangerment and witness tampering were dropped in 2013.

Previous Post

August 25, 2016

Why Catholics should be alarmed about the rise of the religious 'nones'

Next Post

August 25, 2016 Head of Mother Teresa's order: she was like 'a mother to me'

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Americas Asia - Pacific Europe Middle East - Africa Uncategorized US Vatican

Select a Month November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

How many specific prophecies about Messiah?

Select your answer to see how you score.

300+ 250 150 200