Supreme Court sends more mandate cases back to lower circuits

Last updated on: May 24, 2016 at 11:30 pm by CNA Daily News

Supreme Court sends more mandate cases back to lower circuits 2016-05-24T23:30:00+00:00 CNA Daily News

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Washington D.C., May 24, 2016 / 05:30 pm (CNA/EWTN News).- After sending the Little Sisters’ HHS mandate case back to the circuit courts on May 16, the Supreme Court voided two more mandate cases with Catholic plaintiffs on Monday.

The court was expected to rule this summer on the constitutionality of the “opt-out” process for non-profits with the HHS contraception mandate.

The Little Sisters of the Poor, who care for the poor elderly in homes across the country, have argued that the process – where they would notify the government of their religious objection to providing the coverage for contraceptives, sterilizations, and abortion-inducing drugs for employees – still forced them to be complicit with evil.

Since the sisters knew that voicing their objection would ultimately trigger the coverage being provided within the structure of their health plan, they would still be “facilitating access to contraceptives and abortifacients,” they said.

This amounted to coercion by the government, they added, since they would have to pay massive fines – up to 40 percent of yearly donation revenue – for refusing to obey the mandate.

In Zubik v. Burwell, the Supreme Court sent back to the federal circuit courts all the cases of all the plaintiffs, including the Little Sisters, the Archdiocese of Washington, the pro-life group Priests for Life, and several Christian colleges. The circuit court decisions, which all went against the non-profits, were voided.

The decision came after the Supreme Court, in a rare move in the middle of a case, had ordered both parties to come up with alternative solutions, if possible, of guaranteeing both contraceptive coverage for employees and religious freedom protections for the non-profits.

“Both petitioners and the Government now confirm that such an option is feasible,” the court said in its statement.

The Little Sisters and other plaintiffs, in their brief, outlined an acceptable alternative: when setting up their health plan with their insurer, they would express their wish for a health plan without coverage for the contraceptives, sterilizations and abortion-causing drugs. The insurer would take note and offer employees “cost-free contraception coverage” on the side and outside the health plan.

For their part, “the Government has confirmed that the challenged procedures ‘for employers with insured plans could be modified to operate in the manner posited in the Court’s order while still ensuring that the affected women receive contraceptive coverage seamlessly, together with the rest of their health coverage,” the statement read.

Because of the new developments in the case, the court then sent the group cases back to their respective federal courts.

Then on Monday, the Supreme Court sent back two more mandate cases to the circuit courts and voided those decisions after the plaintiffs had asked the court to review the case documents. The plaintiffs included the Michigan Catholic Conference and the Diocese of Nashville in one case decided by the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals, and the Archdiocese of New York in another case decided by the Second Circuit Court.

The Supreme Court repeated its statement from the Zubik ruling that “nothing” in its decision would prevent the government from ensuring that employees have access to cost-free contraception coverage; also, they could not force the plaintiffs to pay the fines for not complying with the contraception mandate, until the case was ultimately decided.

“Given the gravity of the dispute and the substantial clarification and refinement in the positions of the parties, the parties on remand should be afforded an opportunity to arrive at an approach going forward that accommodates petitioners’ religious exercise while at the same time ensuring that women covered by petitioners’ health plans receive full and equal health coverage, including contraceptive coverage,” the court stated in the Zubik v. Burwell opinion.

“We anticipate that the Courts of Appeals will allow the parties sufficient time to resolve any outstanding issues between them,” it said.

Previous Post

May 24, 2016

Don't love concepts – love people, Pope Francis tells aid workers

Next Post

May 25, 2016 In South Carolina, unborn babies' pain drives latest pro-life bill

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Americas Asia - Pacific Europe Middle East - Africa Uncategorized US Vatican

Select a Month November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

According to James, what should you do if you lack wisdom?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Fast and pray for seven days Study the Torah diligently Seek counsel from elders Ask God, who gives generously