EWTN asks federal court to reconsider its HHS mandate case

Last updated on: May 4, 2016 at 10:51 pm by CNA Daily News

EWTN asks federal court to reconsider its HHS mandate case 2016-05-04T22:51:00+00:00 CNA Daily News

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Washington D.C., May 4, 2016 / 04:51 pm (CNA/EWTN News).- The Eternal Word Television Network (EWTN) has asked a federal court to reconsider its ruling forcing the company to comply with the revised HHS mandate, based on an admission by the federal government in its brief before the Supreme Court.

“The government admitted what we have said from the beginning,” said Michael Warsaw, CEO of EWTN. “Once you get past the bureaucratic smokescreen, this really comes down to one issue: the government wants to hijack our health plan. EWTN cannot let them do it.”

EWTN, the world’s largest religious media network, is one of hundreds of non-profits and charities suing the federal government over its mandate – and the revisions it made to the mandate – that requires employers to offer health plans including contraceptives, sterilizations, and drugs that can cause early abortions.

The government’s revision to the mandate was what it called an “accommodation” for non-profits who religiously objected to providing the coverage. The parties would send a notice of their objection to the government, who would then notify their insurer of the objection. The insurer would provide the contraception coverage separately.

In the current HHS mandate case before the Supreme Court, Zubik v. Burwell, a number of charities including the Little Sisters of the Poor and the Archdiocese of Washington have argued that sending their notice of objection to the government still constitutes tacit acceptance and facilitation of a morally-objectionable act, providing contraceptives for employees. They are basically acting as a “gatekeeper” for the objectionable coverage, they argued.

Furthermore, they say that the government is unconstitutionally “hijacking” their health plan, which is an agreement between them and their insurer, in forcing the unwanted coverage into the plan.

EWTN lost its initial case at the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals in February. A panel of judges ruled 2-1 that the government had indeed forced the network, under threat of heavy fines, to choose between its religious beliefs and participating with a morally-objectionable act in honoring the mandate.

Nevertheless, the judges ruled that the government was not imposing a “substantial burden” on EWTN’s religious beliefs by doing so. Federal law protects from government action that “substantially burdens” a person’s religious beliefs, unless that action is for a “compelling government interest” and is the “least-restrictive means” of furthering that interest.

The dissenting opinion in the ruling sharply disagreed, saying that the ruling “runs roughshod over the sincerely held religious objections of Eternal Word Television Network.”

Now EWTN wants the 11th Circuit Court to reconsider the decision. The Supreme Court, in a historically rare move in the middle of the case, asked both sides in the Zubik v. Burwell case to submit supplemental briefs outlining an alternative solution – if any – that would fulfill both parties’ interests of contraceptive coverage and religious freedom.

The government, in its supplemental brief, “essentially” admitted that it is “taking over” the health plans of the Little Sisters and other non-profits, Daniel Blomberg of the Becket Fund for Religious Liberty told CNA. Since EWTN is a non-profit as well, the same standard would apply to its own case.

“The government’s been arguing all along that it’s not really forcing EWTN to do anything except sign some paperwork,” he said. Meanwhile, EWTN has said that the government is indeed “forcing” them to do something very significant, to “sign something that changes my health care plan, the plan that I administer and I stay involved with.”

The 11th Circuit had sided with the government that the revised mandate only asked EWTN to perform a task the equivalent of raising its hand, which was not a “substantial burden” on its religious beliefs, Blomberg explained.

Now, the government’s admission in the supplemental brief that it is intruding on health plans, he continued, acknowledges that “this is a hijack of a plan that forces [EWTN] to be involved — as long as they’re providing health care, they’re involved in the government’s scheme.”

It is “something much more significant and something only EWTN can do, and that is create new legal responsibilities for their health care plan to start providing drugs that violate their faith.”

EWTN broadcasts to over 258 million television households in more than 145 countries and territories. It also broadcasts via satellite radio, internet radio and other media. Its publications include the National Catholic Register. Its news services include Catholic News Agency.

Previous Post

May 4, 2016

Iraqi Christians grateful, yet uneasy following foiled Islamic State attack

Next Post

May 5, 2016 Salvatorians apologize for failing to protect Irish children from abusive priest

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Americas Asia - Pacific Europe Middle East - Africa Uncategorized US Vatican

Select a Month November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What does the Bible teach about giving to the poor?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Be generous Ignore them Take from them Insult them