Concerns over religious freedom help sink LGBT bills

Last updated on: May 27, 2016 at 12:46 pm by CNA Daily News

Concerns over religious freedom help sink LGBT bills 2016-05-27T12:46:00+00:00 CNA Daily News

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Washington D.C., May 27, 2016 / 06:46 am (CNA/EWTN News).- Religious liberty was among the primary concerns that ultimately defeated controversial legislation aimed at enforcing a 2014 LGBT executive order twice this week.

If passed, the amendments could infringe upon religious liberty of federal contractors, critics say. Since the executive order does not have explicit protections for religious contractors, Catholic institutions could risk losing their contracts if they object to offering spousal benefits for same-sex partners or permitting individuals to use the bathroom that does not align with their biological sex.

The amendment in question, inserted by Rep. Sean Patrick Maloney (D-N.Y.), would bar federal money from any federal contractor who makes employment decisions “on the basis of sexual orientation or gender identity.” It is meant to enforce President Barack Obama’s executive order that forbade contractors from making such employment decisions.

After the amendment initially had the 213 votes needed to be included in a large defense spending bill last week, GOP leadership held the vote open for a few more minutes and persuaded several members to switch their votes, enough to kill the amendment.

A week later, Rep. Maloney inserted another such amendment into an energy and water spending bill. It was approved Wednesday evening.

However, Rep. Joe Pitts (R-Penn.) attached an amendment of his own clarifying that Maloney’s amendment would be limited by the First and Fourteenth Amendments and Article I of the Constitution. Essentially, contractors would be ensured First Amendment protections in choosing not to hire someone because of their behavior, and the government could not terminate the contract purely because of that employment decision.

Another amendment by Rep. Bradley Byrne (R-Ala.) established religious freedom protections: it forbade “the use of funds in contravention of the Religious Freedom Restoration Act of 1993.”

Then on Thursday, the spending bill failed as 305 House members – both Democrats and Republicans – voted against it. Many Democrats reportedly opposed the bill because of several other amendments attached.

President Obama’s 2014 executive order was staunchly opposed by leading U.S. bishops who said it would infringe upon the rights of religious contractors to make employment decisions consistent with their religious beliefs.

Two bishops – Archbishop William Lori of Baltimore, chair of the U.S. Bishops’ Conference ad hoc committee on religious liberty and Bishop Richard Malone of Buffalo, chair of the bishops’ family life committee – expressed grave concerns about the order after it was issued, calling it “unprecedented and extreme” and saying it discriminated against religion.

The bishops insisted that “the Church strongly opposes…unjust discrimination against those who experience a homosexual inclination.”

However, they stressed, the order not only forbade contractors from making employment decisions based on someone’s sexual “inclination,” but also on their “behavior.” Thus, employers whose “policies or practices reflect religious or moral objections to extramarital sexual conduct” would not be able to contract with the government.

As for the order’s prohibition on “‘gender identity’ discrimination,” it was wrong on both “principle” and “practice,” the bishops said.

It was wrong on principle because it treated gender as “nothing more than a social construct or psychological reality” that someone could choose rather than something grounded in biological fact, the bishops said. It was also wrong in practice because it could lead to invasions of privacy like a “biological male employee” using the “women’s restroom or locker room,” they added.

Previous Post

May 27, 2016

Did Facebook 'blacklist' religious news in their trending topics?

Next Post

May 27, 2016 Pope Francis met with Orionines today. Who are they?

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Americas Asia - Pacific Europe Middle East - Africa Uncategorized US Vatican

Select a Month November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

True or False: Nehemiah was a cupbearer to King Nebuchadnezzar.

Select your answer to see how you score.

TRUE FALSE