Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Catholic News

Home

Home
Catholic
Religion News
Criminal justice reform and the high cost of incarceration

Criminal justice reform and the high cost of incarceration

Last updated on: April 26, 2016 at 9:46 pm by CNA Daily News

Criminal justice reform and the high cost of incarceration 2016-04-26T21:46:00+00:00 CNA Daily News

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Washington D.C., Apr 26, 2016 / 03:46 pm (CNA).- Experts from across the political spectrum are calling for criminal justice reform, as a new White House report shows the human and economic costs of the current justice system.

“This is a singular moment in one of the most challenging issues facing our country,” Michael Waldman, president of the Brennan Center for Justice at New York University’s School of Law, said at a Monday press conference introducing the report, “Economic Perspectives on Incarceration and the Criminal Justice System.”

“What better way to bring people together than to look at those at the periphery of our society and say, what can we do together to need them?” Arthur Brooks, president of the American Enterprise Institute, stated at the press conference.

According to a new report from the White House Council of Economic Advisors, the U.S. incarcerates prisoners at a rate of 700 per 100,000 residents, “more than 4 times the world average,” and employs over 2.5 times the corrections officers. However, the U.S. employs 30 percent fewer police officers than the rest of the world.

Overall, the number of incarcerated is 4.5 times what it was in 1980. The report’s executive summary credits this increase to “longer sentences and higher conviction rates for nearly all offenses.”

Meanwhile, the crime rate has fallen. Property crime has dropped by 52 percent since 1980, and violent crime by almost 40 percent since then. The number of arrests has declined at a slower rate, meaning more arrests per crime. The number of drug arrests has increased by over 90 percent since 1980.

Incarcerations disproportionately occur in the black and Latino communities, as well as in populations that are less educated, poorer, and more prone to mental illness and drug abuse.

Members of the black community are incarcerated at a rate 3.5 times that of whites, and while blacks and Hispanics make up 30 percent of the overall population, they represent 50 percent of the prison population.

Over 65 percent of those incarcerated have not finished high school and over half are “functionally illiterate,” Brooks said. 50 percent suffer from mental illness, and 70 percent regularly use drugs.

And arrests aren’t the only problem. Fines are levied against anyone, regardless of income level, which means if an individual can’t pay a traffic ticket it can eventually turn into an arrest warrant. “Though fines and fees may be initially charged for minor offenses, the burden of these payments can increase for individuals that cannot pay them on time, with late fees, processing fees, interest, and even incarceration for failure to pay these debts,” the report stated.

According to one study cited in the report, in 2010 in New York City approximately 80 percent of defendants could not make bail at amounts less than $500.”

The cost to society is enormous. The U.S. spends $260 billion per capita on incarceration and $870 billion in the criminal justice system as a whole. The latter amount, however, belies the increasing disparity in the number of available public defenders versus the number of cases; the average number of cases per public defender has been estimated at over 350 per year.

“Our society pays an enormous material price for this,” Brooks said of incarceration. However, he added, “this really isn’t about money. This is about the lives that we’re throwing away.”

Waldman agreed, noting that “the magnitude of the problem has been hiding in plain sight.” He emphasized the importance of economic data, saying that “the rigor and the impact of economic analysis is matchless” in offering “measurable costs and benefits” and “consequences” of incarceration.

And there are also unseen costs of incarceration, the report noted. Children are growing up without their fathers around. Marriages fall apart with the husband in prison. Families fall into poverty without the breadwinner working. Children with a parent in prison are at higher risk for psychological disorders, struggles at school, and unemployment.

And for those who do get released from prison, life doesn’t get easier. Those with a criminal record are 50 percent less likely to receive a call back from a prospective employer or a job offer than another applicant with a similar application, and that disparity widens among black applicants.

Unemployment is a leading cause of recidivism – 60 percent of parolees are back behind bars within three years of their release, Brooks noted. Only one in three inmates has “access” to job training or other educational programs in prison, leaving them “entirely unprepared for life after prison,” he added.

What can be done to reduce America’s incarcerated population while keeping the country safe? Some claim that a tough-on-crime stance brought more criminals behind bars and was responsible for the drop in crime in the last couple of decades, but that might not necessarily be the case, the report claimed.

Yes, the crime rate goes down as the incarceration rate goes up, but there are diminishing returns for every increase in the incarceration rate. With more incarcerations, more low-level offenders are in jail.

Instead, other investments may actually pay better dividends for public safety. Several economic studies cited concluded that investments in police and in education are far more “cost-effective” than greater incarceration or stricter sentencing.

Police investment could pay off, according to one study in Oregon which found that after mass layoffs of state troopers, the incidents of traffic deaths and injuries spiked. A stronger police presence could possibly have resulted in fewer traffic incidents.

“Offering more correctional education and job training for inmates and the formerly incarcerated can reduce barriers to reentry and decrease recidivism,” the report’s conclusion suggested.

And a higher graduation rate could mean fewer incarcerations in the future. One 2004 study estimated that, according to 1990 costs and benefits, “a 1 percent increase in the total high school graduation rate generates a $1.4 billion benefit due to reductions in crime rates.”

Photo credit: pixs4u via www.shutterstock.com.

Previous Post

April 26, 2016

Pope Francis names new archbishop of Havana, Cuba

Next Post

April 26, 2016 Pope blasts clericalism in Latin American Church

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Americas Asia - Pacific Europe Middle East - Africa Uncategorized US Vatican

Select a Month November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Who supported Paul's ministry financially?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Priscilla Phoebe Chloe Lydia