Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Catholic News

Home

Home
Catholic
Religion News
When religious liberty collides with the sexual revolution

When religious liberty collides with the sexual revolution

Last updated on: March 22, 2016 at 12:47 pm by CNA Daily News

When religious liberty collides with the sexual revolution 2016-03-22T12:47:00+00:00 CNA Daily News

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Washington D.C., Mar 22, 2016 / 06:47 am (CNA/EWTN News).- At the heart of many of today’s most pressing U.S. religious liberty concerns is the fallout from the sexual revolution decades ago, said one author on the subject at a recent conference.

Mary Eberstadt, a senior fellow at the Ethics and Public Policy Center, argued that while atheistic Communism failed in Russia and Eastern Europe, a key error persists today in the form of an intolerant secularism rooted in the sexual revolution.

The “anthropological error” at the heart of Communism, “the notion that man can be man without religious liberty lives on with a vengeance now,” Eberstadt said at a conference in Washington, D.C. on March 17.

“In an unforeseen turn that is not only nationwide but cross-civilizational, religious liberty today appears more precarious in the United States than at any time since the American Founding,” she added.

The Catholic University of America hosted the conference on human ecology, celebrating 125 years of the first modern social encyclical Rerum Novarum. It drew clergy and business leaders from across the U.S. to discuss how businesses can better apply principles of Catholic social teaching to their practices.

Human ecology was the focus of the second part of the conference. Eberstadt’s talk was on “religious liberty vs. the sexual revolution” and the profound implications this fight has for the poor and the vulnerable in the U.S.

Eberstadt is the author of the 2012 book “Adam and Eve after the Pill: Paradoxes of the Sexual Revolution.”

In her talk, she said that secularist forces are trying to close down or de-Christianize religious charities because they won’t comply with their demands for access to contraception and abortion, rooted in the sexual revolution.

If these activists succeed, she added, the consequences will be disastrous for the poor.

This fight is seen most clearly in the administration’s contraception mandate, Eberstadt said. The administration’s “absolutism” in insisting that employers provide contraception coverage for employees – and that religious charities provide it indirectly against their conscience – has led to hundreds of lawsuits, diverting resources away from helping the needy toward legal fees.

The Little Sisters of the Poor, the most prominent plaintiff in these lawsuits, should have won the compassion of everyone in their fight to stay open, Eberstadt said. Their mission of helping the poor elderly “can soften the hardest heart” and yet “even among other people engaged in full-time charity work, the Little Sisters are spoken of with harsh tones.”

“From the point of view of sheer public relations, taking on the Little Sisters of the Poor ought to have been the political equivalent of slapping babies,” she continued, yet the administration is opposing them in court.

“Nothing stopped an American government animated by secularist progressivism from trying to make even the Little Sisters of the Poor knuckle under to whatever is being demanded today in the name of the sexual revolution,” she said.

She gave other examples of this intolerance. The American Civil Liberties Union is suing Catholic hospitals, as well as immigration services of the U.S. Bishops Conference, for not providing abortions. The National Abortion Rights Action League has sponsored legislation to force pro-life pregnancy centers in California to tell patients about abortion and contraceptive options.

These groups may just claim that they are “pro-choice” and in favor of women’s access to these products and procedures, but “something deeper is afoot,” Eberstadt said. These antagonists are “not only despisers,” she added, but “they are, and act like, affiliates of a rival faith.”

This “faith,” is the belief that an autonomous individual should have access to sex, contraception, and abortion and that no entity, including religious charities, should deny them this right.

If these forces win and religious charities must close, the cost would be steep, particularly to the poor people these charities serve, Eberstadt continued. They “cannot be replaced, not overnight, not by government agencies,” she insisted, and their particular love of the poor rooted in Christianity cannot be replicated by the state.

“How is disrupting these supply lines even remotely in the interest of public humanity?” she asked.

How can Catholics respond to these attacks? We must go on the offensive, the speaker stressed. “We need to point out that people who attack charities,” she said, “are subverting the public good.”

“It’s wrong to lay siege to pregnancy centers,” she said of efforts to make pro-life pregnancy centers tell clients about abortion options. “It is wrong to hold desperate immigrants hostage at the Southern border” to comply with secularist demands of access to abortion contraception, she said of the ACLU lawsuits against the U.S. Bishops Conference.

“The attacks on religious charities prove that they do not stand on the high ground,” she said. One faith is “hurting the poor. The other side is doing the opposite,” she concluded.

Previous Post

March 22, 2016

Divine Mercy meets World Youth Day this summer in Poland

Next Post

March 22, 2016 Pope Francis grieves Belgium attacks, condemns 'blind violence'

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Americas Asia - Pacific Europe Middle East - Africa Uncategorized US Vatican

Select a Month November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What did Nehemiah do upon reading that Moabites and Ammonites were forbidden in God's assembly?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Started a fast Expelled them Closed the gates Rebuilt the altar