Georgia bishops: religious freedom bill veto a chance for more debate

Last updated on: March 30, 2016 at 5:35 pm by CNA Daily News

Georgia bishops: religious freedom bill veto a chance for more debate 2016-03-30T17:35:00+00:00 CNA Daily News

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Atlanta, Ga., Mar 30, 2016 / 11:35 am (CNA/EWTN News).- Following the Georgia governor’s recent veto of a religious liberty bill, the state’s Catholic bishops are calling for further debate and dialogue on the issue.

“We fervently support religious liberty guaranteed by the United States and Georgia constitutions and we respect those who seek to enhance those freedoms through legislation,” said Archbishop Wilton Gregory of Atlanta and Bishop Gregory Hartmayer of Savannah.

The governor’s veto means that debate will continue, the bishops said in a March 29 statement. They encouraged respect for the “worthy motivations” of people on both sides of the debate.

The state’s Catholic bishops did not take an explicit stand for or against the legislation. Instead they commented more broadly, “While we and the other Catholic bishops in the United States support the Religious Freedom Restoration Act (RFRA), we do not support any implementation of RFRA in a way that will discriminate against any individual.”

Archbishop Gregory and Bishop Hartmayer stressed the importance of religious liberty, rooted in the dignity of each human person.

Georgia Governor Nathan Deal, a Republican, vetoed House Bill 757 on Monday.

The bill would have protected some faith-based organizations like churches and religious schools or associations from being forced to compromise the tenets of their faith through various means. It would have protected them from being required to employ people whose beliefs or practices are not in accord with the organizations’ religious beliefs.

It would also have protected religious officials from being required to perform marriage ceremonies by state law, as well as protecting organizations from being forced to rent facilities or allow them to be used for events that violate their “sincerely held religious belief.”

Gov. Deal said the bill does not reflect Georgia’s image as a state of “warm, friendly people.” While backers of the bill cited violations of religious liberty in other states, he said these were not relevant to Georgia, whose law does not recognize sexual orientation as a protected class.

Deal also said he rejected “threats” from some businesses opposed to the bill.

Opponents of the bill included LGBT activist groups and major corporations like Disney, Apple and Intel that threatened economic retaliation against the state if it passed the bill. The NFL and the NCAA warned that the passage of the bill could influence their decisions about holding sports championships in the state.

Ryan T. Anderson, a writer on marriage and religious liberty topics based at the Heritage Foundation, criticized the governor’s veto. He charged that the governor “caved to pressure from big business and special interests.”

“This shows the lack of courage of many in the political class, and it also highlights the extreme nature of the left and the business community. To these groups, even mild religious liberty protections are unacceptable,” Anderson said in a March 28 commentary at The Daily Signal.

Anderson said the revised bill was “very modest” and may not in fact provide any protection for religious freedom from new or existing laws that protect sexual orientation and gender identity.

He said the vetoed bill had a narrow definition of religious organizations and its lack of protections for bakers, florists, or wedding industry professionals who cannot cooperate in the celebration of a same-sex union for religious reasons.

Anderson called for strong religious freedom protections.

“America is in a time of transition,” he said, citing the redefinition of marriage in the courts and changing beliefs about human sexuality. “During this time, it is critical to protect the right to disagree and the civil liberties of those who speak and act in accord with what Americans had always believed about marriage – that it is the union of husband and wife.”

Photo credit: Rob Hainer via www.shutterstock.com.

Previous Post

March 30, 2016

Vatican diplomacy zeros-in on human rights in Africa

Next Post

March 30, 2016 India's bishops push government to help find Fr Tom

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Americas Asia - Pacific Europe Middle East - Africa Uncategorized US Vatican

Select a Month November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What is the "Great Schism" in Christian history?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Division between Eastern and Western churches Catholic-Protestant split Council of Trent Crusades