US Supreme Court will hear challenge to Texas abortion law

Last updated on: November 13, 2015 at 10:30 pm by CNA Daily News

US Supreme Court will hear challenge to Texas abortion law 2015-11-13T22:30:00+00:00 CNA Daily News

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Washington D.C., Nov 13, 2015 / 03:30 pm (CNA/EWTN News).- The Supreme Court of the United States announced Friday that it will hear a challenge to Texas’ safety standards for abortion clinics, in what could be a significant abortion case.

Pro-life advocates welcomed the opportunity for the court to uphold the law.

“The Supreme Court now has the opportunity to confirm that states have a legitimate and compelling interest in better ensuring the safety and health of women who enter abortion clinics,” stated Sarah Torre and Elizabeth Slattery of the Heritage Foundation Nov. 13, in response to the Court’s announcement.

The law enacts “sensible regulations” that show “a laudable concern for the safety of women,” said Dr. Grazie Christie of The Catholic Association in a statement.

"The Supreme Court will now have the chance to put women’s health before the corporate financial interests of Planned Parenthood and their affiliates, as the citizens of Texas intended,” she added.

The Texas law was passed in 2013 after a filibuster by then-senator Wendy Davis (D) helped delay the vote, receiving national attention. The law mandated higher safety standards for abortion clinics and banned abortions after 20 weeks of pregnancy, on the grounds that unborn babies of that age can feel pain.

Specifically, the law holds abortion clinics in the state to the same health standards as those of ambulatory surgery clinics, and requires abortion doctors to have admitting privileges at a local hospital in case of a post-abortion health emergency. Clinics must also provide a 24-hour hotline for women when such emergencies arise.

The requirement that abortion doctors have admitting privileges was initially struck down by a federal district court in 2013, but was upheld by the U.S. Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals in June. The Supreme Court afterwards, by a 5-4 margin, granted a temporary stay on the law going into effect, pending an appeal to the court by its opponents.

In September, abortion clinics in the state had asked the Court to hear their challenge to the law. The petitioners argued in part that the law violates the court’s 1992 decision Planned Parenthood v. Casey, which upheld a women’s right to abortion as “a fundamental liberty,” and that states cannot enact “unnecessary health regulations” that pose “a substantial obstacle” to this right.

After the 2013 law’s passage, the number of abortion clinics in the state fell by more than half, the petition noted.

Texas attorney general Ken Paxton's office responded that the law is meant to “protect the health and safety of women and ensure abortion clinics in Texas meet basic standards.”

Other supporters of the law’s passage pointed to evidence from the 2013 trial of Philadelphia abortionist Kermit Gosnell showing the need for strong health regulations at abortion clinics.

Gosnell was convicted in 2013 on three counts of first-degree murder and one count of involuntary manslaughter after babies were killed after birth at his clinic. A police raid of his clinic had revealed horrific sanitary conditions, and the grand jury report claimed that if his clinic met the health standards of a surgery center, the life of one woman could have been saved.

Previous Post

November 13, 2015

For Pope Francis, the Eucharist satisfies our every hunger

Next Post

November 13, 2015 Report of religious group 'sex slave' rattles Church in Spain

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Americas Asia - Pacific Europe Middle East - Africa Uncategorized US Vatican

Select a Month November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Who said, "If we are thrown into the blazing furnace, the God we serve is able to deliver us"?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Nebuchadnezzar Shadrach, Meshach, and Abednego Daniel The high priest