EWTN case against mandate likely on hold until Supreme Court decision

Last updated on: November 6, 2015 at 8:56 pm by CNA Daily News

EWTN case against mandate likely on hold until Supreme Court decision 2015-11-06T20:56:00+00:00 CNA Daily News

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Irondale, Ala., Nov 6, 2015 / 01:56 pm (CNA/EWTN News).- With the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision to hear all cases against the federal contraception mandate that have received an appellate ruling, EWTN’s case will likely be put on hold until a final decision is reached.

“Today’s decision by the US Supreme Court to take up the HHS contraceptive mandate cases, including the one filed by the Little Sisters of the Poor is wonderful news,” said Michael Warsaw, chairman and CEO of the EWTN Global Catholic Network.

“In our own challenge to the mandate, EWTN has been waiting for the Atlanta-based U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit to issue a decision following oral arguments before that court in February 2015,” he explained. “Today’s action by the Supreme Court may mean the EWTN case will be put on hold pending the outcome of the Supreme Court’s decision.”

Founded by Franciscan nun Mother Mary Angelica, EWTN is the largest religious media network in the world, reaching over 230 million television households in more than 140 countries and territories.

The network includes television, radio and a publishing arm, along with a website and both electronic and print news services, including Catholic News Agency.

EWTN initially filed a lawsuit against the regulation in 2012. However, that suit was dismissed on technical grounds in March 2013. The current lawsuit was filed in October 2013.

In June 2014, U.S. District Court Judge Callie V.S. Granade of Mobile, Ala., ruled against EWTN, and the network filed an appeal. The Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals then issued a temporary injunction protecting EWTN from the mandate while the case continued in the court system, protecting the network from penalties of up to $35,000 per day during that time.

The Feb. 4 oral arguments were heard by appellate court judges Jill A. Pryor, Gerald Bard Tjoflat, and R. Lanier Anderson.

EWTN made the argument that the government is being arbitrary in its granting of religious exemptions to the mandate.

“What the government is saying is that EWTN isn’t religious enough, it’s not entitled to the same religious freedom as the Catholic Church which it serves,” Lori Windham, the lead attorney for EWTN in the case, argued before the court. Windham serves as senior counsel for the Becket Fund for Religious Liberty.

“Contraception, sterilization and abortion-inducing drugs are not healthcare and participating in providing them to our employees violates our Catholic beliefs,” Warsaw said. “When EWTN launched its first lawsuit against the mandate in 2012, we made it clear that we cannot and will not compromise our strongly held beliefs on these moral issues.”

“We are extremely encouraged by the fact that the Supreme Court has chosen to weigh in on this unprecedented government violation of religious liberty,” he continued. “We ask our EWTN Family to continue to keep this matter in their prayers.”

Previous Post

November 6, 2015

Supreme Court to hear HHS mandate case for Little Sisters, other non-profits

Next Post

November 6, 2015 Money and status don't make you happy – selflessness does, Pope says

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Americas Asia - Pacific Europe Middle East - Africa Uncategorized US Vatican

Select a Month November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Which Persian king allowed the Jews to return and rebuild Jerusalem?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Darius Artaxerxes Xerxes Cyrus