Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Catholic News

Home

Home
Catholic
Religion News
What a proposed US bill on religious liberty would and would not protect

What a proposed US bill on religious liberty would and would not protect

Last updated on: July 17, 2015 at 1:03 am by CNA Daily News

What a proposed US bill on religious liberty would and would not protect 2015-07-17T01:03:00+00:00 CNA Daily News

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Washington D.C., Jul 16, 2015 / 07:03 pm (CNA/EWTN News).- With same-sex marriage now legal throughout the United States, some members of Congress are trying to protect the religious rights of those who disagree with marriage's new definition – but their efforts may be limited.

The First Amendment Defense Act, introduced by Rep. Raul Labrador (R-Idaho) and Sen. Mike Lee (R-Utah), would prohibit “discriminatory action” by the federal government against those who believe marriage is between a man and a woman or who believe sex outside of marriage is wrong.

“No group should lose its tax-exempt status because of its views on marriage,” stated Labrador.

“Religious non-profits fulfill a vital humanitarian role in our nation, and they must remain free to staff and operate according to the same religious tenets that motivate their compassion for their communities,” Rep. Vicky Hartzler (R-Mo.) said at a July 16 press conference on Capitol Hill on the bill. Hartzler co-chairs the House Values Action Team.

The prevailing concern with the Supreme Court’s legalization of same-sex marriage licenses nationwide is that those opposing the law of the land might see their federal benefits cut as a result.

The bill intends to protect the tax-exempt status of such organizations, along with other federal benefits such as contracts with religious non-profits and businesses. Those could not be terminated simply because of an entity’s religious beliefs on marriage. For example, charities such as The Salvation Army or Samaritan’s Purse could not lose federal funding simply because of their religious beliefs on marriage, members of Congress explained.

Two bishops who publicly supported the act – Archbishop William Lori of Baltimore and Archbishop Salvatore Cordileone of San Francisco – called it a “federal non-discrimination act.”

However, while the bill is hailed as an important measure for religious freedom, it does its limits.

It would not protect any entity against the federal birth control mandate, since it only protects religious beliefs on marriage and on sex outside of marriage.

Thus even religious houses like the Little Sisters of the Poor, who have opposed the mandate in court and lost, would not be protected by the law.

“This would not apply to them at all,” Lee acknowledged.

The 10th U.S. Circuit Court recently ruled that the sisters must obey the federal mandate that their insurance plans for employees cover contraceptives, abortion-inducing drugs, and sterilizations. The sisters had refused, saying that doing so would violate their religious beliefs.

More than 300 plaintiffs have filed lawsuits claiming the mandate – including later modifications made to “accommodate” the religious beliefs of certain non-profits and businesses – violates their religious beliefs.

The bill would also not apply to another prominent religious liberty case, in which an Oregon bakery was sued by a same-sex couple because it refused for religious reasons to serve their wedding. The state fined the bakery $135,000 for emotional damages inflicted on the couple in the case.

In cases like that one, “you’re dealing with discrimination occurring between private parties,” Lee said, and not between a business and the federal government. Thus FADA would not apply to the case.

Neither would the bill protect anyone against action from state and local governments. For example, the Christian couple who run a for-profit wedding chapel in Coeur d’Alene, Idaho, would not be protected by the bill in their fight against a city ordinance mandating that they conduct same-sex weddings.

In Washington, D.C., religious schools and organizations are already facing a law forcing them to violate their religious beliefs. The Human Rights Amendment Act would force religious schools in the district to recognize LGBT student groups and supporters of same-sex marriage, and allow them use of theier facilities.

Thus the bill would not protect the schools against D.C. government specifically; but it is created to guard against similar actions taken by the federal government.

To make the case for the bill, supporters cited comments by the solicitor general acknowledging that the tax-exempt status of some colleges could be ended if same-sex marriage became legal and they still opposed it.

“It’s certainly going to be an issue,” soliciter general Donald Verrilli said of maintaining the tax-exempt status of colleges who opposed legal same-sex marriage.

Previous Post

July 16, 2015

Archbishop to priests: Here's how to not give bad homilies

Next Post

July 17, 2015 Venezuela's bishops caution against the adoption of no-fault divorce

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Americas Asia - Pacific Europe Middle East - Africa Uncategorized US Vatican

Select a Month November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

According to James, what should you do if you lack wisdom?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Fast and pray for seven days Study the Torah diligently Seek counsel from elders Ask God, who gives generously