Washington archdiocese lauds House vote to protect religious liberty – but it may not be enough

Last updated on: May 1, 2015 at 8:44 pm by CNA Daily News

Washington archdiocese lauds House vote to protect religious liberty – but it may not be enough 2015-05-01T20:44:00+00:00 CNA Daily News

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Washington D.C., May 1, 2015 / 02:44 pm (CNA/EWTN News).- The House voted late Thursday night to formally disapprove of two laws which religious and pro-life organizations in the nation’s capital say violate their religious liberty.

The passage of the joint resolution of disapproval, H. J. Res. 43, is the first step towards undoing two laws passed by the Washington, D.C. city council in December and signed into law in January by the city’s mayor, Muriel Bowser (D). Many religious and pro-life employers in D.C. united to oppose the laws as an unconstitutional violation of their First Amendment rights and petitioned Congress to act to stop them.

However, a resolution of disapproval needs to pass the Senate as well, and be signed by the president – and the White House announced April 30 its intention to veto the measure.

The Archdiocese of Washington led opposition to the laws, and praised the House vote. “The archdiocese is very grateful to the members of the U.S. House who voted for H.J. Res. 43 and for the coalition partners who have rallied to uphold religious freedom in our nation’s capital,” the archdiocese said in a statement.

The two laws are the Reproductive Health Non-Discrimination Amendment Act and the Human Rights Amendment of 2014. The former would outlaw any hiring or firing of employees for their “reproductive health decision making” even if they are publicly defying the mission of their employer, such as a pro-life organization or a Catholic school.

For example, pro-life groups and Catholic schools would be forced to retain employees who obtained an abortion with public knowledge of the matter.

The Human Rights Amendment of 2014 overturned a 25 year-old amendment that provided a conscience exemption for religiously-affiliated schools so they would not have to recognize groups or individuals acting in public opposition to their mission. Catholic schools would not have to allow use of their facilities for pro-gay events, for example, or officially recognize openly-gay student groups.

Under D.C. Home Rule, once a bill becomes law in the city Congress has 30 legislative days to pass a joint resolution of disapproval against it. The 30-day window was expected to end April 30 for the House, although for the Senate it could end on May 4 since the body did not receive the laws until March 10.

The House vote was largely along party lines, with most Republicans voting for the resolution and nearly all Democrats voting against it.

Three Democrats broke ranks and supported the resolution: Rep. Henry Cuellar (D-Tex.), Rep. Collin Peterson (D-Minn.), and Rep. Dan Lipinski (D-Ill.). Meanwhile, 13 Republicans voted against the resolution, five of them from New York districts.

Rep. Diane Black (R-Tenn.) praised the House for upholding religious freedom in a statement after the resolution was passed.

“At its core, the Reproductive Health Nondiscrimination Act is perhaps the most discriminatory ‘nondiscrimination’ law we have seen to date,” she said.

“While this particular law only applies to the District of Columbia, it sets a dangerous precedent for future legislation that could further weaken our long-held tradition of respecting Americans’ conscience rights.”

Previous Post

May 1, 2015

'I find God in suffering': The gripping life and death of Kayla Mueller

Next Post

May 1, 2015 Former Soviet spy: We created Liberation Theology

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Americas Asia - Pacific Europe Middle East - Africa Uncategorized US Vatican

Select a Month November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Which book contains a prophecy about locust swarms devastating the land?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Joel Hosea Micah Obadiah