Is Oklahoma’s use of lethal injection cruel and unusual?

Last updated on: May 2, 2015 at 12:01 pm by CNA Daily News

Is Oklahoma’s use of lethal injection cruel and unusual? 2015-05-02T12:01:00+00:00 CNA Daily News

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Washington D.C., May 2, 2015 / 06:01 am (CNA/EWTN News).- The U.S. Supreme Court heard oral arguments Wednesday in a case challenging the use of the lethal injection in the United States, following a number of botched executions.

Lawyers for three death-row inmates in Oklahoma argued that the state’s three-drug protocol for executions violates constitutional bans on cruel and unusual punishment. The protocol includes the potentially unreliable sedative midazolam.

Midazolam was used in the controversial execution of Oklahoma inmate Clayton Lockett in 2014. Lockett’s execution took more than forty minutes. Although he was sedated, Lockett’s body writhed and he breathed heavily during the execution. Lockett eventually died of a heart attack.

Midazolam was also used in two other prolonged executions last year in Ohio and Arizona in which prisoners appeared to suffer.

Justice Elena Kagan asked Oklahoma officials May 29 during the arguments in Glossip v. Gross how they could justify using midazolam, which has not been proven to protect inmates from feeling the effects of the potassium chloride, which she described as “being burned alive from the inside.”

“So suppose that we said, we’re going to burn you at the stake, but before we do, we’re going to use an anesthetic of completely unknown properties and unknown effects,” Kagan said. “Maybe you won’t feel it; maybe you will. We just can’t tell. And you think that would be okay?”

Justice Samuel Alito countered that Oklahoma and other states have been forced to use midazolam because opponents of the death penalty have pressured drug companies to not produce or sell more reliable sedatives.

“Let’s be honest about what’s going on here,” Alito said. “Executions can be carried out painlessly … is it appropriate for the judiciary to countenance what amounts to a guerilla war against the death penalty?”

The Supreme Court last took up the issue of lethal injection in 2008. In that case, Baze v. Reese, the court ruled that the standard three-drug protocol did not violate constitutional bans on cruel and unusual punishment. However, the court clarified that the first drug in any protocol must prevent inmates from experiencing the intense pain cause by the second and third drugs. The standard protocol approved in 2008 included sodium thiopental rather than midazolam.

Archbishop Paul Coakley of Oklahoma City reaffirmed his opposition to the death penalty in comments to CNA May 1.

“We don't end the cycle of violence by committing more violence," Archbishop Coakley said. “In all of these crimes, we lost a life, and the death penalty only serves to further devalue human dignity. When available, we should choose other non-lethal ways to ensure justice and protect society.”

When the court announced plans in January to re-examine lethal injection protocol, Cardinal Sean O'Malley of Boston prayed that “the court's review of these protocols will lead to the recognition that institutionalized practices of violence against any person erode reverence for the sanctity of every human life.”

“Capital punishment must end,” said Cardinal O'Malley, who is also the head of the U.S. bishops' pro-life activities committee.

Archbishop Thomas Wenski, who leads the U.S. bishops' committee on domestic justice said the execution at the center of Glossip and Gross reveals “how the use of the death penalty devalues human life and diminishes respect for human dignity.”

Pope Francis has also called for the abolishment of all forms of the death penalty.

There are several possible outcomes to Glossip v. Gross. The court could send the case back to the district court for re-evaluation, or issue a ban on midazolam or clearer guidelines for lethal injection.

The Supreme Court had already issued, on Jan. 28, a stay of execution for the plaintiffs in the case, pending its final outcome.

In light of the controversy over the use of midazolam, several states are revisiting other methods of execution, including the electric chair, firing squad, or gas chamber. In March, Utah adopted a law legalizing a five-person firing squad as the official back-up method of execution for the state, should it be unable to obtain the three drugs necessary for lethal injection.

Previous Post

May 1, 2015

Six years after Notre Dame speech, Obama's 'common ground' claim questioned

Next Post

May 2, 2015 Pope Francis celebrates Junipero Serra – a 'founding father' of the US

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Americas Asia - Pacific Europe Middle East - Africa Uncategorized US Vatican

Select a Month November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Who said, "Silver and gold have I none, but what I have I give to you"?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Peter John James Paul