House stalls on one pro-life bill, passes another

Last updated on: January 25, 2015 at 2:51 am by CNA Daily News

House stalls on one pro-life bill, passes another 2015-01-25T02:51:00+00:00 CNA Daily News

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Washington D.C., Jan 24, 2015 / 07:51 pm (CNA).- On the 41st anniversary of the legalization of abortion in the U.S., the House passed a ban on federal funding of abortion, after delaying a vote on a different piece of pro-life legislation.

Cardinal Sean O’Malley of Boston, head of the U.S. bishops’ pro-life committee, praised the vote, stating on Friday that “the House has taken a decisive step toward respect for unborn human life, reflecting the will of the American people.”

Although President Obama promised that no taxpayer dollars would fund abortion coverage under the Affordable Care Act, the Government Accountability Office reported in September that some abortion coverage in some health plans was not billed separately by the insurance issuers, as required by the law. Thus, both unknowing consumers and federal subsidies were paying for abortion coverage.

The president had made his promise through an executive order, to quell concerns of a group of congressmen who opposed the bill because of abortion funding. The Affordable Care Act passed with their subsequent support.

In addition, many consumers found it difficult or even impossible to ascertain whether or not their health plan on the state insurance exchanges covered abortion.

The No Taxpayer Funding for Abortion Act solidifies Hyde Amendment restrictions already in place and prohibits any “funds authorized or appropriated by Federal law” from paying for abortion or abortion coverage. In addition, no federal health facilities or medical employees may perform abortions.

The House passed the bill on Thursday by a vote of 242-179, largely along party lines. Only one Republican opposed the bill – Rep. Richard Hanna (N.Y.). Three Democrats supported it – Rep. Dan Lipinski (Ill.), Rep. Henry Cuellar (Tex.), and Rep. Collin Peterson (Minn.).

The bill also mandates disclosure of the extent to which each plan under the Affordable Care Act includes abortion coverage.

“This lets Americans choose health coverage that reflects their values,” Cardinal O’Malley said of the law. “Just as most Americans do not want their tax dollars used for abortion, they do not want their own health coverage misused to pay for abortions.”

Rep. Chris Smith (R-N.J.) who sponsored the bill said it “will help save lives.”

President Obama asserted his strong commitment to legal abortion on Thursday and launched a deep criticism of the law.

“I believe that efforts like H.R. 7, the bill the House considered today, would intrude on women's reproductive freedom and access to health care and unnecessarily restrict the private insurance choices that consumers have today,” he said.

“The federal government should not be injecting itself into decisions best made between women, their families, and their doctors. I am also deeply committed to continuing our work to reduce unintended pregnancies, support maternal and child health, promote adoptions, and minimize the need for abortion.”

The House had scrambled to vote on the bill after having previously planned a vote on another pro-life bill, the Pain-Capable Unborn Child Protection Act. That bill would ban abortions after 20 weeks of pregnancy except in cases of rape, incest, or threat to the life of the mother.

That plan was scuttled at the last minute due to opposition led by Rep. Renee Ellmers (R-N.C.) and Rep. Jackie Walorski (R-Ind.). The two congresswomen took issue with language in the rape exemption clause, saying it should be reworked before voting.

Pro-life leaders expressed their disappointment at the House leadership pulling the vote but applauded the passage of the No Taxpayer Funding of Abortion Act.

Previous Post

January 24, 2015

Pope Francis surprised by misunderstanding of his words on family

Next Post

January 25, 2015 Why the pro-life movement needs Democrats

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Americas Asia - Pacific Europe Middle East - Africa Uncategorized US Vatican

Select a Month November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Who urged Esther to approach the king, saying, "For such a time as this"?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Mordecai Nehemiah Ezra Haggai