Conscience rights for DC religious schools threatened by city vote

Last updated on: December 11, 2014 at 2:10 am by CNA Daily News

Conscience rights for DC religious schools threatened by city vote 2014-12-11T02:10:00+00:00 CNA Daily News

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Washington D.C., Dec 10, 2014 / 07:10 pm (CNA).- The Washington D.C. city council has stripped religious schools of legal protection against certain discrimination lawsuits, voting unanimously to repeal an exemption that had been in place for decades.

Under city rules, it is an “unlawful discriminatory practice” for a school to limit any use of facilities, services, or programs to someone based on “sexual orientation, gender identity or expression.”

However, an amendment inserted by Congress in a federal appropriations bill 25 years ago offered an exemption for religiously-affiliated schools or schools “closely associated with the tenets of a religious organization,” allowing them to restrict funds, facilities and endorsements based on their religious convictions regarding homosexuality.

This provision, dubbed the “Armstrong Amendment,” came after Georgetown University refused to recognize a pro-gay student group, explained Michael Scott of the D.C. Catholic Conference.

Sen. William Armstrong authored the exemption, called the Nation's Capital Religious Liberty and Academic Freedom Act, which allowed religiously-affiliated schools in D.C. to withhold funds, facilities and approval from people and groups “that are organized for, or engaged in, promoting, encouraging, or condoning any homosexual act, lifestyle, orientation, or belief."

But that exemption is now gone, thanks to a Dec. 2 vote by the city council to overturn that provision. The council voted “unanimously without comment or changes” to pass the Human Rights Amendment of 2014 which included the repeal of the code, Scott explained.

Congress has 30 days to void the action by the city council.

Scott offered written testimony before the city council in October.

He maintained that repeal of the religious exemption would be an “unjustifiable violation of these Schools’ rights to advance their sincerely held religious beliefs regarding human sexuality.”

“The Act disregards one of our nation’s first and most cherished freedoms, the right to exercise religion free from government interference,” he said. “Schools are not only obligated by their religion, but also permitted by the Constitution to freely teach and act according to their faith.”

“Neither the Council, nor the Act’s proponents, have provided compelling reasons sufficient to justify such a heavy burden on the schools’ religious practice, as required by the First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution and Religious Freedom Restoration Act of 1993 (RFRA),” he continued.

Scott said that while the overturning of the exemption affects schools, “it is an open question whether a religious seminary or an institution with educational programs, educational instruction, or an educational component would be implicated by the legislation.”

Lawrence J. Morris, general counsel for The Catholic University of America, told CNA that “we do not expect to make any policy changes” as a result of the city council vote.

He explained: “we believe that the new law, if it goes into effect, would have to be read with the limiting and illuminating perspective of the First Amendment, which permits us to operate our religious university in accordance with our deeply held religious beliefs.”

Morris added that The Catholic University of America “would not expect to initiate a suit” on the matter, but if it is brought to court they would invoke the First Amendment and the Religious Freedom Restoration Act.

“[W]e do not consider the law to require us to do anything that contravenes our First Amendment freedoms,” he said, adding that in court “we would be defending our rights rather than bringing an action challenging the new law as such.”

Previous Post

December 10, 2014

Consumers have a social responsibility regarding slavery, Pope says

Next Post

December 11, 2014 Palestinian nuns among newly advanced causes for sainthood

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Americas Asia - Pacific Europe Middle East - Africa Uncategorized US Vatican

Select a Month November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What does "Jabez" mean in Hebrew?

Select your answer to see how you score.

The Lord Saves Sorrow Strength Victory