Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Catholic News

Home

Home
Catholic
Religion News
Pro-euthanasia ruling axed due to plaintiff’s secret suicide

Pro-euthanasia ruling axed due to plaintiff’s secret suicide

Last updated on: October 2, 2014 at 6:52 am by CNA Daily News

Pro-euthanasia ruling axed due to plaintiff’s secret suicide 2014-10-02T06:52:00+00:00 CNA Daily News

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Strasbourg, France, Oct 2, 2014 / 12:52 am (CNA/EWTN News).- A woman’s lawsuit aiming to change European law on assisted suicide has been thrown out after revelations that she had secretly committed suicide three years ago, unbeknownst even to her lawyer.

“She was dead one year and a half before the judgment of (a lower court),” Gregor Puppinck of the European Centre for Law and Justice said Sept. 30. “From the facts of the case, we find that the applicant’s lawyer did not know those essential aspects of the case.”

The Grand Chamber of the European Court of Human Rights threw out the case on Sept. 30. Knowledge of the patient’s suicide “might have had a decisive influence on its judgment” in the case, the court said.

Alda Gross, a Swiss citizen, filed suit against the Swiss government in 2009 after she failed to secure a doctor’s prescription for drugs to commit suicide. Switzerland is one of several European countries that permits assisted suicide by lethal injection of sodium pentobarbital, but its laws require a doctor’s examination and prescription for patients seeking the drug.

The Swiss courts had held that the restrictions on the drug are in place “to prevent abuse.” The court had ruled that Gross “does not suffer from a fatal disease,” and thus was not eligible for assisted suicide.

Gross’ appeal to the European Court of Human Rights resulted in a May 2014 decision, by a vote of 4-3, which held that the ban violates patients’ right to privacy and family life found within the European Convention on Human Rights.

But due to revelations of Gross’ suicide, that decision has now been thrown out.

It was revealed that she committed suicide in November 2011 using a lethal drug obtained through a prescription.

Gross’ lawyer had reported that he communicated with Gross through her reputed “confidant,” a volunteer for the pro-assisted suicide group EXIT.

“The applicant herself asked specifically her confidant not to inform her lawyer about the prescription and her subsequent death, as she strongly wanted her case to ‘open the way for other persons in her situation’,” Puppinck said.

The court found that Gross “took all the necessary safeguards to hide her death, as she wanted to prevent any interruption of the procedure before the court,” he added. The European human rights court’s grand chamber concluded that Gross deliberately misled her lawyer and the court.

Paul Coleman of the legal group Alliance Defending Freedom said the circumstances surrounding the ruling were “extraordinary.

He stressed that the panel ruling against the Swiss law was “a bad decision” because “the government has an obligation to protect life, not assist in promoting death.”

“The lawsuit’s claim that a person should be able to do whatever he or she pleases does not override national laws rightfully designed to protect the weak and vulnerable,” Coleman said.

Puppinck said the dismissal of the case “sent a clear and strong message” against efforts to “instrumentalize the court.”

Alliance Defending Freedom and the European Centre for Law and Justice had been authorized to intervene in the case as third parties.

The Alliance Defending Freedom is involved in a legal challenge to Belgium’s laws that allow doctor-assisted suicide. That legal challenge comes from a man whose mother committed assisted suicide even though she was not terminally ill and did not notify her family.

In 2011, the European Court of Human Rights unanimously rejected a legal case which contended that Switzerland is obligated to assist individuals to commit suicide.

Europe

Previous Post

October 1, 2014

US bishop: Political will lacking, but Holy Land wants peace

Next Post

October 2, 2014 Cardinal Pell's secretariat continues economic reform at the Vatican

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Americas Asia - Pacific Europe Middle East - Africa Uncategorized US Vatican

Select a Month November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Which prophet confronted King Ahab about his sins?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Elisha Elijah Ezekiel Jeremiah