Mandate revisions not enough – district court grants injunction to Ave Maria

Last updated on: October 29, 2014 at 8:07 am by CNA Daily News

Mandate revisions not enough – district court grants injunction to Ave Maria 2014-10-29T08:07:00+00:00 CNA Daily News

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Naples, Fla., Oct 29, 2014 / 02:07 am (CNA/EWTN News).- A federal court in Florida has granted Ave Maria University preliminary protection from the federal contraception mandate, which the school has challenged on religious freedom grounds.

“After dozens of court rulings, the government still doesn't seem to get that it can't force faith institutions to violate their beliefs,” said Eric Baxter, senior counsel at the Becket Fund for Religious Liberty, which represented the university.

“Fortunately, the courts continue to see through the government’s attempts to disguise the Mandate’s religious coercion,” Baxter said in an Oct. 28 statement. “We congratulate Ave Maria for its courage, even under the threat of crippling fines.”

On Oct. 28, a federal district court in Florida ruled that the new regulations surrounding the Department of Health and Human Services’ controversial contraceptive mandate do not adequately protect religious employers and their consciences.

In its decision, the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida granted Ave Maria University preliminary protection from violating its deeply-held religious beliefs or being penalized with substantial fines.

Issued under the Affordable Care Act, the HHS mandate has faced more than 100 lawsuits brought by over 300 for-profit and non-profit plaintiffs, objecting that the rules force them to violate their religious convictions.

The mandate requires that employers offer health insurance plans that cover contraception, including some drugs that can cause early abortions, and sterilizations.

In June, the Supreme Court ruled that the mandate, as written, violated the 1993 Religious Freedom Restoration Act by forcing the owners of “closely-held” for-profit employers to go against their religious beliefs.

The high court said that the government had not proven that the mandate was the least restrictive means of providing free contraceptives to employees.

In response to the court ruling, Obama Administration proposed modifications to the mandate. Among these modifications was a change to the way that the rule affects non-profit religious groups that object to it.

The proposed modifications alter an earlier “accommodation” provided to non-profit religious employers. The suggested changes would allow employers to notify the government of their objection to the mandate, prompting the government to then arrange the coverage that the employers find objectionable.

This would change an earlier provision that required the religious employer itself to authorize an insurer or third-party administrator to provide the objectionable products and procedures.

However, some employers, such as Ave Maria University, argue that that this arrangement still requires an employer’s participation in facilitating access to products and procedures that violate their deeply-held religious beliefs.

The Florida court’s ruling on behalf of Ave Maria University protects the school from facing millions of dollars in fines that could have been levied against the school after the revised mandate would have taken effect on Nov. 1.

“The government has been retreating since it first issued the Mandate three years ago,” Baxter said. “Now it's time for the government to stop going after religious colleges and ministries and start respecting religious liberty.”

Previous Post

October 29, 2014

Ukrainian dignity and determination, as a nation votes for change

Next Post

October 29, 2014 Life is cheaper than salt: a Nigerian bishop facing Boko Haram

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Americas Asia - Pacific Europe Middle East - Africa Uncategorized US Vatican

Select a Month November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Who was the king of Israel known for his wisdom?

Select your answer to see how you score.

David Solomon Hezekiah Saul