Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Catholic News

Home

Home
Catholic
Religion News
Vatican marriage commission could drop mandatory appeal for annulments

Vatican marriage commission could drop mandatory appeal for annulments

Last updated on: September 23, 2014 at 8:12 am by CNA Daily News

Vatican marriage commission could drop mandatory appeal for annulments 2014-09-23T08:12:00+00:00 CNA Daily News

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Detroit, Mich., Sep 23, 2014 / 02:12 am (CNA/EWTN News).- After it was announced that Pope Francis had appointed a commission to study a reform of the process of marriage annulment, a canonist in the U.S. has suggested that dropping the requirement for mandatory appeals could preserve justice in the process.

“Mandatory appeal” is the requirement that to have a supposed marriage recognized as in fact null, when one tribunal finds it to be null, the case must be sent to an appeals tribunal to affirm the decision, before it is official.

Mandatory appeal “seldom results in reversing affirmative decisions made in first instance and amounts therefore in a many-month delay in completing cases for no obvious reason,” wrote Dr. Edward Peters, professor of canon law at Sacred Heart Major Seminary in Detroit, in his Sept. 22 blogpost, “The annulment argument: a quick guide to the two sides.”

“Besides,” he continued, “if one does not trust the officers of first instance to reach a sound result, why should one trust the officers of second? While they sit on different cases they are often the very same people.”

The Vatican announced Saturday that on Aug. 27 – nearly a month ago – Pope Francis had established the commission to study reform of the annulment process. It is chaired by Msgr. Pio Vito Pinto, dean of the Roman Rota, a sort of appeals court of the Roman Curia, and other members are fellow tribunal members; the head of the pontifical council which interprets canon law; the rector of the Angelicum; canon law professors; the secretary of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith; and a Greek Catholic bishop.

The commission will “focus on the preparation of a proposal for the reform of the marriage annulment process, seeking to simplify and streamline the procedure, while safeguarding the principle of the indissoluble nature of marriage,” the Holy See press office stated.

The announcement comes amid preparations for the Oct. 5-19 extraordinary synod of bishops on “pastoral challenges to the family in the context of evangelization.”

As part of its preparations, Cardinal Walter Kasper of Germany has proposed that there be “other more pastoral and spiritual procedures” for determining the validity of a marriage than the use of tribunals.

Several other cardinals quickly opposed Cardinal Kasper's suggestions, including Mueller, Caffarra, Brandmueller, Bagnasco, Sarah, Re, Ruini, and De Paolis.

In his Monday blogpost serving as a guide to the two sides in the argument, Peters suggested that the side taken by those such as Cardinal Kasper “seeks not so much reform of the annulment process as its effective abolishment,” and that those like Cardinal Caffarra are “mistaken if (they) think the annulment problem lies in the annulment process.”

Those wishing to uphold the indissolubility of marriage, he said, must remember that “nothing about current canon and special law makes declaring marriage nullity easy,” and that nullity must be proven on the basis of sworn testimony.

This group, Peters suggested, may actually think that the members of marriage tribunals may be “too naive, too heterodox, or just too lazy” to be trusted in deciding nullity, but such a judgment is hasty.

“Nevertheless that is essentially their claim: the process needs no major reform, processors do,” Peters wrote.

Peters then said that those such as Cardinal Kasper, were they pushed “to be clear” about what they seek, would admit it “is the 'de-juridicization' of the annulment process.”

“It’s their right, of course, to make such a proposal, but one should not confuse calls tantamount to elimination of a process with calls for reform of a process,” Peters noted.

He added that the present aspects of the annulment process are necessary to make it a just process, though he suggested two which are not necessary: the defender of the bond, and mandatory appeal.

The defender of the bond must propose and explain everything which is reasonably evidence against a marriage's nullity. Peters stated that the office was instituted by Benedict XIV, who had “decades of legal experience dealing with real human beings gained within a Church drawing on centuries of pastoral experience dealing with real human beings,” and added, “I would be loath to see that office abolished.”

He did, however, object less to the abolition of mandatory appeal, though he also noted that no one “thinks that members of the second group [i.e Kasper's] would be satisfied with … such ancillary reforms.”

“No, what the second group really wants, I think, is to eliminate the annulment process precisely as a juridic process.”

Peters wrote that such suggestions would place the determination of nullity in the hands of the couple themselves, or their pastor, or their marriage counselor.

“Inescapably, though, such a proposal requires this: dropping the canonical presumption that when people wed they marry validly, so we don’t need a canonical process to determine whether that presumption withstands objective scrutiny; alternatively … dropping the idea that Jesus meant everything he said about marriage, divorce, fornication, and adultery.”

Accepting that Christ meant his teachings about marriage and divorce, Peters urged, means that “people who wed should be accorded the presumption that they are married, and – no matter what one finally calls it – a juridic process to test that presumption and, in turn, to respect those teachings, is going to be required.”

Previous Post

September 23, 2014

Criticism of abortion funding in health care law spans party lines

Next Post

September 23, 2014 Cardinal Burke: Media hijacking Synod on the Family

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Americas Asia - Pacific Europe Middle East - Africa Uncategorized US Vatican

Select a Month November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What does the name "Samuel" mean?

Select your answer to see how you score.

God has heard God is my judge The Lord saves Chosen one