Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Catholic News

Home

Home
Catholic
Religion News
Colo. Senate considers ‘extraordinarily broad’ abortion bill

Colo. Senate considers ‘extraordinarily broad’ abortion bill

Last updated on: April 15, 2014 at 3:13 am by CNA Daily News

Colo. Senate considers ‘extraordinarily broad’ abortion bill 2014-04-15T03:13:00+00:00 CNA Daily News

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Denver, Colo., Apr 14, 2014 / 09:13 pm (CNA/EWTN News).- A Colorado Senate committee has advanced legislation that could bar any new pro-life laws in the state, prompting criticism that the bill is extreme and would prevent reasonable health and safety-based regulations.

Jenny Kraska, executive director of the Colorado Catholic Conference, said the bill would “set back the pro-life cause in Colorado greatly.”

“Not only would it undo good prolife laws that we already have enacted, but it would hinder the ability for any good measured policies in the pro-life arena to even be enacted,” she told CNA April 10.

The bill’s “extraordinarily broad” definition of reproductive health care would create a “fundamental right” to anything defined as such, including abortion.

The Catholic conference said the bill could affect many laws including parental notification or involvement laws, conscience protection laws, and requirements that only licensed physicians perform abortions. The bill could affect laws concerning maternal health, as well as government programs and facilities that pay for or promote childbirth without subsidizing abortion.

It could also impact school health clinics and abstinence education policies.

The bill, S.B. 175, says each individual has “a fundamental right of privacy with respect to reproductive health care decisions” and is “entitled to make reproductive health care decisions free from discrimination, coercion, or violence” and without “interference from the state.”

The bill would bar state agencies and local government from having a policy that “denies or interferes with an individual’s reproductive health care decisions.”

“Given the current political climate in Colorado, I would say there is a very good chance this bill would pass in its current form,” Kraska warned. She urged Coloradans to contact their legislators and “make their voice heard” in opposition to “such a broad expansion of Colorado’s pro-choice laws.”

The Democrat-controlled Colorado Senate Health and Human Services Committee passed the bill by a 4-3 vote at the end of an April 10 hearing, splitting along party lines.

Committee member Sen. Jeanne Nicholson, a bill sponsor, explained her support for the bill, saying, “The only thing I do not tolerate is intolerance and it is obvious to me that any time we are imposing our views on another person’s reproductive health rights, we are not respecting their view.”

The pro-abortion group NARAL Pro-choice Colorado said in an action alert that if the bill passes, it will be the first law of its kind in the country.

Committee member Sen. Kevin Lundberg asked the bill proponents how the bill defines “individual.”

“Do we mean every human being?” he asked, saying if the meaning of “individual” is meant to exclude the unborn, then “their fundamental right to life is being jeopardized.” He said the bill “presumes that the unborn human being has no rights.”

The bill’s proponents did not address how the bill affects the unborn.

The bill’s other sponsors are State Sens. Andy Kerr and State Reps. Dianne Primavera and Mike McLachlan, all Democrats.

Jessica Haverkate, vice president of Colorado Family Action, told CNA that the bill is “a radical attempt to sweep aside existing laws and to prevent the state from enacting true protective measures for women in the future.”

“This legislation poses an undeniable and irreparable danger to common-sense laws supported by a majority of Americans,” she said April 10.

Natalie Decker, an attorney with the religious freedom group Alliance Defending Freedom, told those present at the hearing that her organization is “very concerned” about the impact of the bill. She characterized the legislation as “deceptive” saying it should be called the “abortion on demand act.”

She said the bill “failed to provide basic definitions” and uses an “extremely broad” conception of reproductive health care.

“My first grader has the right to demand access to reproductive health care decisions and to that information,” she said. She warned that the bill would bar “commonsense laws and policies that protect the health and well-being of women and children.”

Decker said the legislation could bar health and safety regulations on abortion clinics and partial birth abortion bans. She said that the law directly conflicts with Colorado’s constitutional ban on public funding for abortions.

Attorney Nicole Martin warned that the law could endanger conscience protections for state employees and employees of state pharmacies. The legal ambiguities of the bill would only be clarified through court action. She said that local governments and agencies, including school boards, would change their policies for fear of lawsuits if the bill is passed.

Kraska suggested to the hearing that the bill is based on a wrong idea of freedom.

“Freedom is more than an unlimited supply of choices. True freedom is the ability to know, and the courage to do, what is right, and what is just,” she said. “This legislation is neither right nor just for the people of Colorado.”

Denver Archbishop Samuel Aquila has asked the people of Colorado to pray and contact their lawmakers about the bill. He invited the faithful to join him to pray in front of the State Capitol at 3 p.m. April 15.

Previous Post

April 15, 2014

Pope expresses solidarity, comfort for fire victims in Chile

Next Post

April 15, 2014 Amid backlash after resignation, Mozilla says it respects diverse views

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Americas Asia - Pacific Europe Middle East - Africa Uncategorized US Vatican

Select a Month November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

In the Parable of the Good Samaritan, who ignored the injured man before the Samaritan helped?

Select your answer to see how you score.

A priest and a Levite A farmer and a shepherd A Roman soldier and a scribe A fisherman and a tax collector